H-Index Scholarel índice h de los profesores de las universidades públicas españolas en humanidades y ciencias sociales

  1. Delgado López-Cozar, Emilio
  2. Orduña Malea, Enrique
  3. Jiménez Contreras, Evaristo
  4. Ruiz Pérez, Rafael
Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Ano de publicación: 2014

Título do exemplar: Documentación audiovisual

Volume: 23

Número: 1

Páxinas: 87-94

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2014.ENE.11 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: El profesional de la información

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

The H-Index Scholar is a bibliometric index that measures the productivity and scientific impact of the academic production in humanities and social sciences by professors and researchers at public Spanish universities. The methodology consisted of counting their publications and citations received in Google Scholar. The main features and characteristics of the index are explained. Despite technical and methodological problems that Google Scholar might have as a source of information, the authors estimate that they do not affect substantially the calculated h and g indexes, probably being the error lower than 10%. The total population analyzed was 40,993 researchers, but data are displayed only for 13,518 researchers, the ones located in the first tertile of their respective areas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguillo, Isidro F.; Ortega, José-Luis; Fernández-Pérez, Mario; Utrilla, Ana-María (2010). “Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories”. Scientometrics, v. 82, n. 3, pp. 477-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0183-y
  • Archambault, Eric; Larivière, Vincent (2010). “The limits of bibliometrics for the analysis of the social sciences and humanities literature”. World social science report: competing in the knowledge society. Unesco, pp. 251-254.
  • Archambault, Eric; Vignola-Gagné, Étienne; Côtè, Grégoire; Larivière, Vincent; Gingras, Yves (2006). “Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases”. Scientometrics, v. 68, n. 3, pp. 329–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z
  • Ardanuy, Jordi (2009). “Els estudis bibliomètrics basats en l’anàlisi de citacions en àrees d’humanitats en el període 1959-2008”. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, n. 22. http://bid.ub.edu/22/ardanuy.htm
  • Ardanuy, Jordi (2013). “Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951-2010)”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 8, pp. 1751-1755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22835
  • Broadus, Robert N. (1971). “The literature of the social science: a survey of citation studies”. International social science journal, n. 23, pp. 236-243.
  • Callon, Michel; Courtial, Jean-Pierre; Penan, Hervé (1995). Cienciometría. El estudio cuantitativo de la actividad científica: de la bibliometría a la vigilancia tecnológica. Gijón: Trea.
  • Cronin, Blaise (1984). The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
  • Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio; Ruiz-Pérez, Rafael (2009). “La comunicación y edicion científica fundamentos conceptuales”. En: Homenaje a Isabel de Torres Ramírez: Estudios de documentación dedicados a su memoria. Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada, pp. 131-150.
  • Egghe, Leo (2006). “Theory and practice of the g-index”. Scientometrics, v. 69, n. 1, pp. 131-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
  • Giménez-Toledo, Elea; Román-Román, Adelaida (2009). “Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: A review and a study towards a model of evaluation”. Research evaluation, v. 18, n. 3, pp. 201-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/095820209X471986
  • Gorraiz, Juan; Purnell, Philip J.; Glänzel, Wolfang (2013). “Opportunities for and limitations of the Book Citation Index”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 7, pp. 1388-1398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22875
  • Hicks, Diana M. (2004). “The four literatures of social science”. En: Moed, H. F.; Glänzel, W.; Schmoch, U. (Eds.). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 473-496.
  • Hicks, Diana M.; Wang, Jian (2009). “Towards a bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities” [report]. http://works.bepress.com/diana_hicks/18
  • Hirsch, Jorge E. (2005). “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output”. PNAS, v. 102, n. 46, pp. 16569-16572. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  • Jacsó, Péter (2008a), “Google Scholar revisited”. Online information review, v. 32, n. 1, pp. 102-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520810866010
  • Jacsó, Péter (2008b). “The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar”. Online information review, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 437-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520810889718
  • Jacsó, Péter (2012). “Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h-index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia – siren songs and air-raid sirens”. Online information review, v. 36, n. 3, pp. 462-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684521211241503
  • Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (2007). “Google Scholar Citations and Google Web/URL citations: a multidiscipline exploratory analysis”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 58, n. 7, pp. 1055- 1065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20584
  • Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (2008). “Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines”. Scientometrics, v. 74, n. 2, pp. 273-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0217-x
  • Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike; Rezaie, Somayeh (2011). “Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 62, n. 11, pp. 2147-2164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21608
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Felt, Ulrike (2012). “Edited volumes, monographs and book chapters in the Book Citation Index (BKCI) and Science Citation Index (SCI, SoSCI, A&HCI)”. Journal of scientometric research, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 28-34.
  • Moed, Henk F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer. Nederhof, Anton J. (2006). “Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review”. Scientometrics, v. 66, n. 1, pp. 81-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2
  • Orduña-Malea, Enrique (2012). Propuesta de un modelo de análisis redinformétrico multinivel para el estudio sistémico de las universidades españolas. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia [tesis doctoral]
  • Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Ontalba-Ruipérez, José-Antonio (2013). “Proposal for a multilevel university cybermetric analysis model”. Scientometrics, v. 95, n. 3, pp. 863-884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0868-5
  • Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Serrano-Cobos, Jorge; Lloret-Romero, Nuria (2009). “Las universidades públicas españolas en Google Scholar; presencia y evolución de su publicación académica web”. El profesional de la información, v. 18, n. 5, pp. 493-500. http://eprints.rclis.org/17211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2009.sep.02
  • Osca-Lluch, Julia; Veyrat, Ana; Morales, Jesús (2013). “El consumo de información en Humanidades”. Arbor, v. 189, n. 760. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2013.760n2012
  • Thelwall, Mike (2002). “Research dissemination and invocation on the web”. Online information review, v. 26, n. 6, pp. 413-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520210452745
  • Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2013). “Cobertura de las editoriales científicas del Book Citation Index en ciencias sociales y humanidades: ¿la historia se repite?”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 7, pp. 110-113.
  • Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Ruiz-Pérez, Rafael; Delgado-LópezCózar, Emilio (2009). “Google Scholar como herramienta para la evaluación científica”. El profesional de la información, v. 18, n. 5, pp. 501-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2009.sep.03
  • Van Impe, Steven; Rousseau, Ronald (2006). “Web-to-print citations and the humanities”. Information–Wissenschaft und Praxis, v. 57, n. 8, pp. 422-426.
  • White, Howard D.; Boell, Sebastian K.; Yu, Hairong; Davis, Mari; Wilson, Concepción S.; Cole, Fletcher T. H. (2009). “Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n. 6, pp. 1083-1096. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21045
Fonte de datos: Dialnet