Donne sulla scena eschileaper una caratterizzazione linguistica

  1. Redondo, Jordi 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revista:
Codex: Revista de Estudos Clássicos

ISSN: 2176-1779

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 9

Número: 1

Páginas: 30-51

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.25187/CODEX.V9I1.40560 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Codex: Revista de Estudos Clássicos

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This paper examines the linguistic devices by means of which Aeschylus achieved the presentation of the female characters of the Oresteia. The analysis is made after a survey of the recitative sections of the three tragedies; phonetic, morphologic and syntactic features have been studied and compared with the language of the masculine characters. The results of this research fit with other precedent attempts to show how sociolinguistics can explain the formal portraiture of the tragic and comic characters.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AMBROSINI, Riccardo. L’uso dell’articolo nei tragici greci, e soprattutto in Eschilo. In: SSL, 28, 1988, pp. 25-40.
  • AMENDOLA, Stefano. Il grido di Clitemestra. In: Lexis, 23, 2005, pp. 19-29.
  • BAIN, David. Female speech in Menander. In: Antichthon, 18, 1984, pp. 43-77.
  • CHAMBERS, Jack K. & TRUDGILL, Peter. Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1980.
  • COLLARD, Christopher. Colloquial language in tragedy: a supplement to the work of P.T. Stevens. In: CQ, 55, 2005, pp. 350-86.
  • COLVIN, Stephen. Dialect in Aristophanes. The politics of language in Ancient Greek literature. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.
  • DENNISTON, John Dewar. The Greek particles. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.
  • DINDORF, Wilhelm. Lexicon Aeschyleum. Leipzig: Teubner, 1876.
  • DUHOUX, Yves. Langage de femmes et d’hommes en grec ancien: l’example de Lysistrata. In: PENNEY, John H. W. (Ed.). Indo-European perspectives: studies in honor of Anna Morpurgo Davies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 131-45.
  • EASTERLING, Patricia. Presentation of Character in Aeschylus. In: G&R, 20, 1973, pp. 3-19.
  • FOLEY, Helene. Female acts in Greek tragedy. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2001.
  • FRAENKEL, Eduard. Due seminari romani tenuti da Eduard Fraenkel. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1977.
  • FRANCOBANDIERA, Daria. I gemiti delle Erinni: Aesch. Eum 103-130. In: QUCC, 90, 2008, pp. 89-98.
  • FRANCOBANDIERA, Daria. Effets sémantiques et fonctionnalité dramatique de quelques interjections dans les Euménides d’Eschyle. Méthodos, 12, https://methodos.revues.org/2950, 2012.
  • HOLMES, Janet. Women’s language: a functional approach. In: General linguistics, 24, 1984, pp. 149-78.
  • HOLMES, Janet. An introduction to sociolinguistics. Harlow: Longman, 2008.
  • HOLMES, Janet. Women’s talk: the question of sociolinguistic universals. In: PICHLER, Pia & COATES, Jennifer (Eds.), Language and gender: a reader. Oxford & Malden: Wiley & Blackwell 2011, pp. 461-483 (= Australian Journal of Communication 20, 1993, pp. 125-49).
  • KATSOURIS, Andreas G. Linguistic and stylistic characterization. Tragedy and Menander. Ioannina: University of Ioannina, 1975.
  • KEY, Mary Ritchie, Male/Female language, with a comprehensive bibliography. Lanham & London 1996.
  • MCCALL, Marsh. The Chorus of Aeschylus’ Choephori. In: Cabinet of Muses: essays in honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990, pp. 17-30.
  • MCCLURE, Laura. Female speech and characterization in Euripides. In: DE MARTINO, Francesco & SOMMERSTEIN, Alan H. (Eds.). Lo spettacolo delle voci II, Bari, 1995, pp. 35-60.
  • MCCLURE, Laura. Speech and gender in Aeschylus’ Oresteia, spoken like a woman: speech and gender in Athenian drama. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 70-111.
  • MEISTERHANS, Konrad & SCHWYZER, Eduard. Grammatik der attischen Inschriften. Berlin: Weidmann, 1900.
  • NÜNLIST, René. The ancient critic at work: terms and concepts of the ancient literary criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009.
  • PARRY, Anne Amory. Blameless Aegisthus: a study of ὰμύμων & other Homeric epithets. Leiden: Brill, 1973.
  • PLATNAUER, Maurice. Prodelision in Greek Drama. In: CQ, 10, 1960, pp. 140-44.
  • PODLECKI, Anthony J. The political background of Aeschylean drama. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1966.
  • PULLEYN, Simon. Erotic undertones in the language of Clytemnestra. In: CQ, 47, 1997, pp. 565-67.
  • REDONDO, Jordi. Sociolecto y sintaxis en la comedia aristofánica. In: LÓPEZ EIRE, Antonio (Ed.). Sociedad, política, literatura. Comedia griega antigua. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca, 1997, pp. 313-28.
  • REDONDO, Jordi. The female sociolect in the Aristophanic comedy and the Attic classical oratory. In: REDONDO, Jordi & SÁNCHEZ i BERNET, Andrea. Archaic, classical and Hellenistic Greek poetry. Contributions to the history of the ancient Greek language. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 2015a, pp. 233-56 (= El sociolecte femení a la comèdia aristofânica. In: QF, 7, 2002, pp. 207-24).
  • REDONDO, Jordi. La parla dels personatges secundaris als pròlegs de la tragèdia euripídica. In: DE MARTINO, Francesco & MORENILLA, Carmen (Eds.). En el umbral de la obra: personajes secundarios en el prólogo. Bari: 2015b, pp. 217-35.
  • REDONDO, Jordi. Variantes y estándar dialectal en el Ática clásica II. La lengua de la comedia aristofánica, el ático antiguo y el ático nuevo. In: REC, 42, 2015c, pp. 189-206.
  • REDONDO, Jordi. Para una sociolingüística del griego antiguo. Estudio de los sociolectos de la lengua griega: literaturas clásica, helenística e imperial. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 2016a.
  • REDONDO, Jordi. Osservazioni sociolinguistiche sulla commedia di Aristofane. In: Hermes, 144, 2016b, pp. 265-78.
  • ROISMAN, Hannah. Women’s free speech in Greek tragedy. In: SLUITER, Ineke & ROSÉN, Ralph (Eds.). Free speech in classical Antiquity. Boston & Leiden: Brill, 2004, pp. 91-114.
  • ROSE, Herbert Jennings. Aeschylus the psychologist. In: SO, 32, 1956, pp. 1-21.
  • ROSENMEYER, Thomas G. The art of Aeschylus. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
  • SÁNCHEZ i BERNET, Andrea. Breu anàlisi lingüística del cor de Perses. In: Tycho, 5, 2017, pp. 217-28.
  • SEIDENSTICKER, Bernd. Charakter und Charakterisierung bei Aischylos. In: JOUANNA, Jacques & MONTANARI, Franco (Eds.). Eschyle à l’aube du théâtre occidental. Genève: Fondation Hardt, 2009, pp. 205-56.
  • SOMMERSTEIN, Alan Herbert. The language of Athenian women. In: DE MARTINO, Francesco & SOMMERSTEIN, Alan H. (Eds.). Lo spettacolo delle voci II, Bari, 1995, pp. 61-85.
  • STEVENS, Philip Theodore. Colloquial expressions in Euripides. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1976.
  • THESLEFF, Holger. Studies on intensification in Early and Classical Greek. Helsinki-Helsingfors: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, 1954.
  • THOMSON, George. The postponement of interrogatives in Attic drama. In: CQ, 33, 1939, pp. 147-52.
  • TRUDGILL, Peter. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban. In: British English of Norwich, Language in society 1, 1972, pp. 179-95.
  • VAM ENDE BOAS, Evert. Aeschylus, In: DE TEMMERMANN, Koen & VAM ENDE BOAS (Eds.). Characterization in Ancient Greek literature. Leiden & Boston, 2018, pp. 317-36.
  • VAN ERP TAALMAN KIP, A. M. καὶ μήν, καὶ δή and ἤδη in tragedy and comedy. In: BAKKER, Stephanie & WAKKER, Gerry C. (Eds.). Discourse cohesion in Ancient Greek. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2009, pp. 111-34.
  • ZILLIACUS, Henrik. Notes on the periphrases of the imperatives in Classical Greek. In: Eranos, 44, 1892, pp. 266-279.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet