Assessing the role of evidence of mechanisms in causal extrapolation

  1. Saúl Pérez-González 1
  2. Valeriano Iranzo 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Zeitschrift:
Theoria: an international journal for theory, history and foundations of science

ISSN: 0495-4548

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Ausgabe: 36

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 211-228

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.1387/THEORIA.21642 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Theoria: an international journal for theory, history and foundations of science

Zusammenfassung

La extrapolación de relaciones causales de poblaciones de estudio a otras poblaciones de interés es una cuestión problemática. El procedimiento estándar en investigación experimental, el cual prioriza los en- sayos controlados aleatorizados y la evidencia estadística, no está carente de dificultades. Dada esta situación, se ha planteado que la evidencia de mecanismos es indispensable para la extrapolación causal. Nosotros argumentamos que, por el contrario, este tipo de evidencia no es indispensable. Sin embargo, pensamos que puede ser de ayuda en ciertas ocasiones. Para clarificar su relevancia, distinguimos entre el rol positivo y el rol negativo de la evidencia de mecanismos. Nuestra conclusión es que el primero es altamente cuestionable, pero el segundo puede ser un recurso fiable para la extrapolación.

€ Finanzierung ansehen

Informationen zur Finanzierung

We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Spanish Ministry of Universities under grant FPU16/03274 (Saúl Pérez-González), and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under research projects FFI2016-76799-P (Valeriano Iranzo) and FFI2017-89639-P (Saúl Pérez-González).

Geldgeber

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Andersen, H. (2012). Mechanisms: what are they evidence for in evidence-based medicine? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 992-999.
  • Anjum, R. L., Copeland, S., & Rocca, E. (2020). Medical scientists and philosophers worldwide appeal to EBM to expand the notion of ‘evidence’. BMJ evidence-based medicine, 25, 6-8.
  • Aronson, J. K., La Caze, A., Kelly, M. P., Parkkinen, V., & Williamson, J. (2018). The use of mechanistic evidence in drug approval. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24, 1166-1176.
  • Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: a mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 421-441.
  • Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (1993). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bell, S. M., Chang, X., Wambaugh, J. F., Allen, D. G., Bartels, M., Brouwer, K. L., ... & Jarabek, A. M. (2018). In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization and decision making. Toxicology in Vitro, 47, 213-227.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
  • Cartwright, N. (2012). Presidential address: Will this policy work for you? Predicting effectiveness better: How Philosophy Helps. Philosophy of Science, 79, 973-989.
  • Clarke, B., Gillies, D., Illari, P., Russo, F., & Williamson, J. (2013). The evidence that evidence-based medicine omits. Preventive Medicine, 57, 745-747.
  • Clarke, B., Gillies, D., Illari, P., Russo, F., & Williamson, J. (2014). Mechanisms and the evidence hierarchy. Topoi, 33, 339-360.
  • Craver, C. F., & Alexandrova, A. (2008). No revolution necessary: Neural mechanisms for economics. Economics & Philosophy, 24, 381-406.
  • Darden, L. (2018). Strategies for discovering mechanisms. In S. Glennan & P. M. Illari (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy (pp. 255-266). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Gillies, D. (2018). Causality, probability, and medicine. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Glennan, S. (2017). The new mechanical philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Glennan, S., & Illari, P. M. (2018). Introduction: Mechanisms and mechanical philosophies. In S. Glennan & P. M. Illari (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy (pp. 1-9). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • GRADE working group. (2016). Criteria for applying or using GRADE. https://www.gradeworkinggroup. org/docs/Criteria_for_using_GRADE_2016-04-05.pdf
  • Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social. On the principles of analytical sociology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in social sciences. Annual review of sociology, 36, 49- 67.
  • Howick, J. (2011). Exposing the vanities—and a qualified defense—of mechanistic reasoning in health care decision making. Philosophy of Science, 78, 926-940.
  • Howick, J., Glasziou, P., & Aronson, J. K. (2010). Evidence-based mechanistic reasoning. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 103, 433-441.
  • Howick, J., Glasziou, P., & Aronson, J. K. (2013a). Can understanding mechanisms solve the problem of extrapolating from study to target populations (the problem of ‘external validity’)? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 106, 81-86.
  • Howick, J., Glasziou, P., & Aronson, J. K. (2013b). Problems with using mechanisms to solve the problem of extrapolation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 34, 275-291.
  • Illari, P. M. (2011). Mechanistic evidence: Disambiguating the Russo-Williamson thesis. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25, 139-157.
  • Illari, P. M., & Williamson, J. (2012). What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. European Journal of Philosophy of Science, 2, 119-135.
  • Jiménez-Buedo, M., & Miller, L. M. (2010). Why a trade-off? The relationship between the external and internal validity of experiments. Theoria, 69, 301-321.
  • Kincaid, H. (2012). Mechanisms, causal modeling, and the limitations of traditional multiple regression. In H. Kincaid (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of social science (pp. 46-64). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1-25.
  • Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2005). A nontechnical introduction to latent class models. DMA Research Council Journal, 2005, 1-15.
  • Marchionni, C., & Reijula, S. (2019). What is mechanistic evidence, and why do we need it for evidence-based policy? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 73, 54-63.
  • Parkkinen, V., Wallmann, C., Wilde, M., Clarke, B., Illari, P., Kelly, M. P., Norell, C., Russo, F., Shaw, B., & Williamson, J. (2018). Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine: Principles and procedures. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Reiss, J. (2010). Review of Daniel Steel’s Across the boundaries: Extrapolation in biology and social science. Economics & Philosophy, 26, 382-390.
  • Reiss, J. (2019). Against external validity. Synthese, 196, 3103-3121. Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (Eds.). (2008). Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Rothwell, P. M. (2005a). External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. The Lancet, 365, 82-93.
  • Rothwell, P. M. (2005b). Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. The Lancet, 365, 176-86.
  • Russo, F., & Williamson, J. (2007). Interpreting causality in the health sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21, 157-170.
  • Salmon, W. C. (1998). Causality and explanation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, S. W., Hauben, M., & Aronson, J. K. (2012). Paradoxical and bidirectional drug effects. Drug safety, 35, 173-189.
  • Steel, D. (2004). Social mechanisms and causal inference. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 55-78.
  • Steel, D. (2008). Across the boundaries: Extrapolation in biology and social science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • van Eersel, G. G., Koppenol-Gonzalez, G. V., & Reiss, J. (2019). Extrapolation of experimental results through analogical reasoning from latent classes. Philosophy of Science, 86, 219-235.
  • Victora, C. G., Habicht, J. P., & Bryce, J. (2004). Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials. American journal of public health, 94, 400-405.
  • Wagenaar, H. (2007). Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: How citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighborhood decline. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 17-50.
  • Wilde, M., & Parkkinen, V. (2019). Extrapolation and the Russo–Williamson thesis. Synthese, 196, 3251- 3262.
  • Williamson, J. (2019). Establishing causal claims in medicine.  International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 32, 33-61.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet