Protocolo¿existe acuerdo o desacuerdo entre los índices de impacto absolutos y relativos obtenidos a partir de los datos de Web of Science y Scopus?

Références bibliographiques

• Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
• Akbulut, M., & Akca, S. (2017) Popularity or prestige?: The case of jasist rank. Journal of Scientometric Research, 6(3), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.6.3.21
• Ameen, E. C., & Guffey, D. M. (2017). A citation analysis and review of research issues and methodologies in advances in accounting education: Teaching and curriculum innovations Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations (Vol. 21, pp. 1-25) https://doi.org/10.1108/S1085-462220170000021002
• ANECA. (Noviembre 2017). Méritos evaluables para la acreditación nacional para el acceso a los cuerpos docentes universitarios: https://www.mecd.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano-mecd/dms/mecd/servicios-al-ciudadano-mecd/catalogo/general/educacion/academia/ficha/academia/criterios-sociales-juridicas.pdf (accedido 29 enero 2017)
• Balatsky, E. V., & Ekimova, N. A. (2017). Competition of economic journals in russia: Results of the three waves of ranking. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, 12(6), 178-201. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2017-6-09
• Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? - a comparison of wos, scopus and google scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y
• Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Lin, A. (2007). Some measures for comparing citation databases. Journal of Informetrics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.08.001
• Barker, K. (2007). The uk research assessment exercise: The evolution of a national research evaluation system. Research Evaluation, 16(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X190674
• Barman, S., Hanna, M. D., & LaForge, R. L. (2001). Perceived relevance and quality of pom journals: A decade later. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00060-7
• Bartol, T., Budimir, G., Dekleva-Smrekar, D., Pusnik, M., & Juznic, P. (2014). Assessment of research fields in scopus and web of science in the view of national research evaluation in slovenia. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1491-1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8
• Basu, A., Banshal, S. K., Singhal, K., & Singh, V. K. (2016). Designing a composite index for research performance evaluation at the national or regional level: Ranking central universities in india. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1171-1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1935-0
• Batiz-Lazo, B., Eskandari, R., & Goddard, J. (2015). Online publishing and citation success in the accounting, business and economic history of spain, 1997-2011. Investigaciones De Historia Economica, 11(3), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihe.2014.07.010
• Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (2003). The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. Journal of marketing, 67(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.123.18610
• Beed, C., & Beed, C. (1996). Measuring the quality of academic journals: The case of economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18(3), 369-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1996.11490078
• Beets, S. D., Lewis, B. R., & Brower, H. H. (2016). The quality of business ethics journals: An assessment based on application. Business & Society, 55(2), 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313478974
• Bettencourt, L. A., & Houston, M. B. (2001). The impact of article method type and subject area on article citations and reference diversity in jm, jmr, and jcr. Marketing Letters, 12(4), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012272305777
• Bonner, S. E., Hesford, J. W., Van der Stede, W. A., & Young, S. M. (2006). The most influential journals in academic accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(7), 663-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.06.003
• Bontis, N., & Serenko, A. (2009). A follow-up ranking of academic journals. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910931134
• Brown, L. D., & Gardner, J. C. (1985). Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (car). Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 84-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490908
• Caligiuri, P. M. (1999). The ranking of scholarly journals in international human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(3), 515-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851999340468
• Cantin, M., Munoz, M., & Roa, I. (2015). Comparison between impact factor, eigenfactor score, and scimago journal rank indicator in anatomy and morphology journals. International Journal of Morphology, 33(3), 1183-1188. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000300060
• Carreras, J. (2011). Evaluation of teaching and faculty promotion (viii). University spanish legislation (f): Quality of teaching and complementary retributions (1st part). Educacion Medica, 14(4), 199- 205. https://doi.org/10.4321/S157-18132011000400002
• Chan, K. C., Chan, K. C., Seow, G. S., & Tam, K. (2009). Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6-7), 875-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.12.002
• Chan, K. C., Fung, H. G., & Yau, J. (2013). Predominant sources and contributors of influential business ethics research: Evidence and implications from a threshold citation analysis. Business Ethics-a European Review, 22(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12024
• Chan, K. C., Lai, P., & Liano, K. (2012). A threshold citation analysis in marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 134-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211189211
• Chan, K. C., & Liano, K. (2009). Threshold citation analysis of influential articles, journals, institutions and researchers in accounting. Accounting and Finance, 49(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00254.x
• Chapman, K., & Ellinger, A. E. (2009). Constructing impact factors to measure the influence of supply chain management and logistics journals. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 197-+. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00119.x
• Chatha, K. A., Butt, I., & Tariq, A. (2015). Research methodologies and publication trends in manufacturing strategy a content analysis based literature review. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(4), 487-546. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2012-0285
• Chow, C. W., Haddad, K., Singh, G., & Wu, A. (2008). A citation analysis of the top-ranked management and financial accounting journals. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 1(1), 29-44.
• Delgado, F. J., & Fernández-Llera, R. (2012). Sobre la evaluación del profesorado universitario (especial referencia a ciencias económicas y jurídicas). 2012, 35(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.2.861
• Di Vaio, G., & Weisdorf, J. L. (2010). Ranking economic history journals: A citation-based impact-adjusted analysis. Cliometrica, 4(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-009-0039-y
• Ding, Y., & Cronin, B. (2011). Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing & Management, 47(1), 80-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002
• DuBois, F. L., & Reeb, D. (2000). Ranking the international business journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 689-704. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490929
• Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of scimago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. Faseb Journal, 22(8), 2623-2628. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-107938
• Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
• Fu, S. C., & Chan, K. M. (2014). Ranking of orthopaedic journals: A challenge to the citation-based metrics. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 2(3), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2014.03.005
• Galán, A., & Zych, I. (2011). Analysis of the criteria of the national commission for the evaluation of research activity (cneai) for the concession of the research incentives in education. Bordon, 63(2), 117-139.
• García-Lillo, F., Úbeda-García, M., & Marco-Lajara, B. (2015). The intellectual structure of human resource management research: A bibliometric study of the international journal of human resourcemanagement, 2000-2012. Revista Europea de Direccion y Economia de la Empresa, 24(3), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.07.001
• Garcia-Pachon, E., & Arencibia-Jorge, R. (2014). A comparison of the impact factor and the scimago journal rank index in respiratory system journals. Archivos De Bronconeumologia, 50(7), 308-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2013.10.006
• Haddad, K., Singh, G., Sciglimpaglia, D., & Chan, H. (2014). To what extent do articles published in other than "top journals" have impact on marketing? European Journal of Marketing, 48(1-2), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2010-0592
• Harris, C. (2008). Ranking the management journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39(4), 373-409. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.39.4.373
• Harzing, A.-W. (2008). On becoming a high impact jour al in international business and management. European Journal of International Management, 2(2), 115-118. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2008.017763
• Harzing, A.-W., & van der Wal, R. (2009). A google scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20953
• Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google scholar, scopus and the web of science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
• Hole, A. R. (2017). Ranking economics journals using data from a national research evaluation exercise. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 79(5), 621-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12185
• Hoobler, J. M., & Johnson, N. B. (2004). An analysis of current human resource management publications. Personnel Review, 33(6), 665-676. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480410561547
• Jiménez-Contreras, E., Robinson-García, N., & Cabezas-Clavijo, A. (2011). Productivity and impact of spanish researchers: Reference thresholds within scientific areas. Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica, 34(4), 505-525. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2011.4.828
• Jobber, D., & Simpson, P. (1 88). A citation analysis of selected marketing journals. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5(2), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(88)90065-1
• Kastrinos, N., & Katsoulacos, Y. (1995). Towards a national system of research evaluation in greece. Research Evaluation, 5(1), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/5.1.63
• Kianifar, H., Sadeghi, R., & Zarifmahmoudi, L. (2014). Comparison between impact factor, eigenfactor metrics, and scimago journal rank indicator of pediatric neurology journals. Acta informatica medica: AIM: journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina: casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 22(2), 103-106. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.103-106
• Law, R., & Van Der Veen, R. (2008). The popularity of prestigious hospitality journals: A google scholar approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110810852113
• Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2010). Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (snip) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(11), 2365-2369. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21371
• Losilla, J. M., Navarro, J. B., Palmer, A., Rodrigo, M. F., & Ato, M. (2005). Análisis de datos. Del contraste de hipótesis al modelado estadístico. Barcelona: Edicions a Petició.
• Lowe, A., & Locke, J. (2005). Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: Results of a web- based survey of british accounting academics. Accounting Organizations and Society, 30(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.002
• Marin-Garcia, J. A., Aragonés Beltran, P., & Melón, G. (2014). Intra-rater and inter-rater consistency of pair wise comparison in evaluating the innovation competency for university students. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 5(2), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v5i2.3220
• Markoulli, M., Lee, C. I. S. G., Byington, E., & Felps, W. A. (2017). Mapping human resource management: Reviewing the field and charting future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 367-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.10.001
• Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2017). An evidence-based review of hr analytics. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244699
• Medina-López, C., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2011). Research in operations management teaching: Trends and challenges. Intangible Capital, 7(2), 507-548. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p507-548
• Medina-López, C., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2012). Una sistematización de los instrumentos de medida de la calidad de la investigación (a systematization of instruments to measure the quality of research). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 3(1), 28- 45. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v3i1.1104
• Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of lis faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105-2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677
• Merigo, J. M., Rocafort, A., & Aznar-Alarcon, J. P. (2016). Bibliometric overview of business & economics research. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(3), 397-413. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.807868
• Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Identifying research fields within business and management: A journal cross-citation analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(8), 1370-1384. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.113
• Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of web of science and scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
• Moussa, S., & Touzani, M. (2010). Ranking marketing journals using the google scholar-based hg-index. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.001
• O'Leary, D. (2008). On the relationship between citations and appearances on “top 25” download lists in the international journal of accounting information systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.02.001
• Olson, J. E. (2005). Top-25-business-school professors rate journals in operations management and related fields. Interfaces, 35(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0149
• Petersen, C. G., Aase, G. R., & Heiser, D. R. (2011). Journal ranking analyses of operations management research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(4), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111119533
• Pindek, S., Kessler, S. R., & Spector, P. E. (2017). A quantitative and qualitative review of what meta-analyses have contributed to our understanding of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.003
• Pislyakov, V. (2009). Comparing two “thermometers”: Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to journal citation reports and scopus. Scientometrics, 79(3), 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2016-1
• Quintas-Froufe, N. (2016). Quality indicators for scientific publications in the social sciences in spain: A comparative analysis between evaluation agencies. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 34(1), 259-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.34.1.210191
• Ramin, S., & Sarraf Shirazi, A. (2012). Comparison between impact factor, scimago journal rank indicator and eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nuclear medicine review. Central& Eastern Europe, 15( ), 132-136.
• Rao, S., Iyengar, D., & Goldsby, T. J. (2013). On the measurement and benchmarking of research impact among active logistics scholars. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(10), 814-832. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2012-0207
• Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2009). Measuring the impact of accounting journals using google scholar and the g-index. British Accounting Review, 41(4), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2009.10.002
• Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2012). Assessing international journal impact: The case of marketing. European Business Review, 24(1), 58- 7 https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341211191553
• Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2013). An improved method for assessing the impact of management journals. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 18(2), 37-54.
• Ruiz-Pérez, R., López-Cózar, E. D., & Jiménez-Contreras E. (2010). Principles and criteria used by the national evaluation committee of research activity (cneai-spain) for the assessment of scientific publications: 1989-2009. Psicothema, 22(4), 898-908.
• Russ-Eft, D. (2008). Ssci, isi, jcr, jif, if, and journal quality. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(3), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1235
• Salgado, J. F., & Páez, D. (2007). Scientific productivity and hirsch's h index of Spanish social psychology: Convergence between productivity indexes and comparison with other areas. Psicothema, 19(2), 179-189.
• Salvador-Oliván, J. A., & Agustín-Lacruz, C. (2015). Correlation between bibliometric indicators in web of science y scopus journals. Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion, 25(2), 341-359. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2015.v25.n2.51241
• Schöpfel, J., & Prost, H. (2009). Comparison of scimago journal rank indicator (sjr) with jcr journal impact factor (if) for french journals. Psychologie Francaise, 54(4), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2009.07.002
• Segalla, M. (2009). Will you cite me? The emerging strategy of academic publishing. European Journal of International Management, 3(4), 411-418. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2009.028847
• Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910931125
• Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311315231
• Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2017). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2017 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 675-692. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0490
• Shugan, S. M. (2003). Editorial: Journal rankings: Save the outlets for your research. Marketing Science, 22(4), 437-441. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.22.4.437.24904
• Sicilia, M. A., Sanchez-Alonso, S., & Garcia-Barriocanal, E. (2011). Comparing impact factors from two different citation databases: The case of computer science. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 698-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.007
• Siebelt, M., Siebelt, T., Pilot, P., Bloem, R. M., Bhandari, M., & Poolman, R. W. (2010). Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for impact factor and scimago. BMC Muscul skeletal Disorders, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-4
• Stonebraker, J. S., Gil, E., Kirkwood, C. W., & Handfield, R. B. (2012). Impact factor as a metric to assess journals where om research is published. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1-2), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.05.002
• Svensson, G. (2006). The paradoxnoia of top journal(s) of top in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 40(11-12), 1153-1168. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610702740
• Tadajewski, M. (2016). Academic labour, journal ranking lists and the politics of knowledge production in marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(1-2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1120508
• Theussl, S., Reutterer, T., & Hornik, K. (2014). How to derive consensus among various marketing journal rankings? Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.006
• Tsay, M. Y. (2012). An overview of the journal impact indicators. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 49(2).
• Viladrich Segués, M. C., & Doval Dieguez, E. (2011). Medición: Fiabilidad y validez. Bellaterra: Laboratori d'Estadística Aplicada i de Modelització (UAB).
• Vokurka, R. J. (1996). The relative importance of journals used in operations management research: A citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 14(4), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00092-7
• Walters, W. H. (2017). Citation-based journal rankings: Key questions, metrics, and data sources. IEEE Access, 5, 22036-22053. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2761400
• Zarifmahmoudi, L., Jamali, J., & Sadeghi, R. (2015). Google scholar journal metrics: Comparison with impact factor and scimago journal rank indicator for nuclear medicine journals. Iranian Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 23(1), 8-14.
• Zhou, Y. B., Lü, L., & Li, M. (2012). Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguishing between prestige and popularity. New Journal of Physics, 14. - https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/033033
• Zinkhan, G. M., & Leigh, T. W. (1999). Assessing the quality ranking of the journal of advertising, 1986- 1997. Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1999.10673583
• Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629