La universidad española como plataforma de emprendimiento: hacia la universidad emprendedora del futuro.

  1. Jose Luis Hervás Oliver 1
  2. Carles Boronat Moll 1
  3. Ignacio Mesana 2
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01460j859

  2. 2 Florida State University
    info

    Florida State University

    Tallahassee, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/05g3dte14

Revista:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Año de publicación: 2017

Título del ejemplar: Emprendimiento universitario

Número: 404

Páginas: 11-19

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Economía industrial

Resumen

La universidad emprendedora se corresponde con una universidad concebida para la sociedad del emprendimiento, yendo más allá de la simple transferencia de tecnología y la tercera misión, al tiempo que responde al cambio actual que se preconiza desde una economía intensiva en industria hacia una intensiva en conocimiento. En este artículo analizamos el estado actual de la universidad emprendedora y proponemos nuevas formas de diseño y mecanismos de gobernanza en la universidad, una arquitectura universitaria para organizar el emprendimiento, enfocada en la transformación de la universidad como plataforma de generación de emprendimiento y empresas, en especial aquellas formadas por alumnos o alumni startups

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AGRAWAL, A. & HENDERSON, R. (2002). «Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT». Management Science, vol. 48, nº1, pp. 44-60.
  • ALLEN, T.J. & O’SHEA, R.P. (2014). Building Technology Transfer Within Research Universities: An Entrepreneurial Approach. Cambridge University Press.
  • AMBROSINI, V.; BOWMAN, C. & COLLIER, N. (2009). «Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base}. British Journal of Management, vol. 20(s1), pp. S9-S24.
  • ANNIQUE UN, C & MONTORO-SANCHEZ, A. (2010). «Innovative capability development for entrepreneurship: A theoretical framework». Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 23, nº 4, pp. 413-434.
  • ASTEBRO, T.; BAZZAZIAN, N. & BRAGUINSKY, S. (2012). «Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implica- tions for university entrepreneurship policy». Research Policy, vol. 41, nº 4, p. 663-677.
  • AUDRETSCH, D.B. (2014). «From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society». Journal of Technology Transfer, nº 39, pp. 313-321.
  • AUDRETSCH, D.B. & FELDMAN, M.P. (1996). «R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production». The American Economic Review, vol. 86. nº 3, pp. 630-640.
  • AUDRETSCH, D.B.; KEILBACH, M. C. & LEHMANN, E.E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press.
  • BARNEY, J.B. (2001). «Is the Resource-Based «View» a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, vol. 26, nº 1, pp. 41-56.
  • BERCOVITZ, J. & FELDMAN, M. (2008). «Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the individual level». Organization Science, vol. 19, nº 1, pp. 69-89.
  • BERGMANN, H.; HUNDT, C. & STERNBERG, R. (2014). «Determinants of students’ entrepreneurial activities: A multilevel analysis». Academy of Management Proceedings, vol. 2014, nº 1, p. 10061.
  • BREZNITZ, S. M.; O’SHEA, R.P. & ALLEN, T.J. (2008). «University Commercialization Strategies in the Development of Regional Bioclusters». Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 25, nº 2, pp. 129-142.
  • CHRISMAN, J.J.; HYNES, T. & FRASER, S. (1995). «Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development -the case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 10, nº 4, pp. 267-281.
  • CLARYSSE, B.; TARTARI, V. & SALTER, A. (2011). «The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship». Research Policy, vol. 40, nº 8, pp. 1084-1093.
  • D’ESTE, P. & PATEL, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, vol. 36, nº 9, pp. 1295-1313.
  • DI GREGORIO, D. & SHANE, S. (2003). «Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, vol. 32, nº 2, pp. 209-227.
  • DIERICKX, I. & COOL, K. (1989). »Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantageç. Management Science, vol. 35, nº 12, pp. 1504-1511.
  • DJOKOVIC, D. & SOUITARIS, V. (2008). «Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research». The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 33, nº 3, pp. 225-247.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H. (1998). «The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages}. Research Policy, vol. 27, nº 8, pp. 823-833.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H. & LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000). »The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations». Research Policy, vol. 29, nº 2, pp. 109-123.
  • FELDMAN, M.P. & LENDEL, I. (2010). «Under the lens: The geography of optical science as an emerging industry». Economic Geography, vol. 86, nº 2, pp. 147-171.
  • FINI, R.; FU, K.; MATHISEN, M. T. & RASMUSSEN, E. (2015). «Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: A cross-country study». Academy of Management Proceedings, nº 1, p. 12146.
  • FINI, R.; FU, K.; MATHISEN, M.T., RASMUSSEN, E. & WRIGHT, M. (2016). «Institutional determinants of university spin-off quanti ty and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study. Small Business Economics, pp. 1-31.
  • FOSS, L. & GIBSON, D.V. (2015). The Entrepreneurial University: Context and Institutional Change. Routledge.
  • FRYGES, H.; MÜLLER, B. & NIEFERT, M. (2014). «Job machine, think tank, or both: what makes corporate spin-offs different?» Small Business Economics, vol. 43, nº 2, pp. 369-391.
  • FRYGES, H. & WRIGHT, M. (2014). «The origin of spin-offs: a typology of corporate and academic spin-offs». Small Business Economics, vol. 43, nº 2, pp. 245-259.
  • GRIMALDI, R.; KENNEY, M.; SIEGEL, D.S. & WRIGHT, M. (2011). «30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, vol. 40, nº 8, pp. 1045-1057.
  • GUERRERO, M. & URBANO, D. (2012). «The development of an entrepreneurial university». The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 37, nº 1, pp. 43-74.
  • GUERRERO, M.; URBANO, D.; CUNNINGHAM, J. & ORGAN, D. (2014). «Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: A case study comparison». The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 39, nº 3, pp. 415-434.
  • HELFAT, C.E.; FINKELSTEIN, S. & MITCHELL, W. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • HELFAT, C.E. & PETERAF, M. A. (2003). «The dynamic resource-based view». Capability lifecycles, vol. 24, nº 10, pp. 997-1010.
  • HENDERSON, R. M. & CLARK, K. B. (1990). «Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms». Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35m nº 1, pp. 9-30.
  • KARABULUT, A.T. (2014). «Entrepreneurial Career Intentions of Alumni: A Study in a Turkish Foundation University». International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 9, nº 2, p. 30.
  • KENNEY, M. & GOE, W.R. (2004). «The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford». Research Policy, vol. 33, nº 5, pp. 691-707.
  • KOGUT, B. & ZANDER, U. (1992). «Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology». Organization Science, vol. 3, nº 3, pp. 383-397.
  • LOCKETT, A. & WRIGHT, M. (2005). «Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies». Research Policy, vol. 34, nº 7, pp. 1043-1057.
  • LOCKETT, A.; WRIGHT, M& FRANKLIN, S.J. (2003). «Technology transfer and universities spin-out strategies». Small Business Economics, vol. 20, nº 2, pp. 185-200.
  • MUSTAR, P.; WRIGHT, M. & CLARYSSE, B. (2008). «University spin-off firms: lessons from ten years of experience in Europe». Science and Public Policy, vol. 35, nº 2, pp. 67-80.
  • NABI, G.; HOLDEN, R. & WALMSLEY, A. (2006). «Graduate career-making and business start-up: a literature review». Education + Training, vol. 48, nº 5, pp. 373-385.
  • NELSON, R.R. (1991). «Why do firms differ and how does it matter?». Trategic Management Journal, vol. 12, nº s2, pp. 61-74.
  • NELSON, R.R. & WINTER, S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. En Belknap press.
  • O’Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A. & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, vol. 34, nº 7, pp. 994-1009.
  • O’SHEA, R.P.; CHUGH, H. & ALLEN, T.J. (2008). «Determinants and Consequences of University Payoff Activity: A Conceptual Framework». The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 33, nº 6, pp. 653-666.
  • PERKMANN, M.; TARTARI, V.; MCKELVEY, M.; AUTIO, E.; BROSTRÖM, A.; D’ESTE, P. & SOBRERO, M. (2013). «Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations». Research Policy, vol. 42, nº2, pp. 423-442.
  • PETERAF, M. A. (1993). «The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, nº 3, pp. 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.4250140303
  • RASMUSSEN, E. & BORCH, O.J. (2010). «University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities». Research Policy, vol. 39, nº 5, pp. 602-612.
  • RASMUSSEN, E. & WRIGHT, M. (2015). «How can universities facilitate academic Spin-Offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective». The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 40, nº 5, pp. 782-799.
  • ROBERTS, E.B. (1991). «The technological base of the new enterprise». Science Direct, vol. 20, nº 4, pp. 283-298.
  • ROTHAERMEL, F.T.; AGUNG, S. D. & JIANG, L. (2007). «University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature». Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791.
  • SÁNCHEZ-BARRIOLUENGO, M. (2014). «Articulating the «three-missions» in Spanish universities». Research Policy, vol. 43, nº 10, pp. 1760-1773.
  • SHANE, S. (2002). «Executive forum: university technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies». Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 17, nº 6, pp. 537-552.
  • SHANE, S. & STUART, T. (2002). «Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups». Management Science, vol. 48, nº 1, pp. 154-170.
  • SPENDER, J. (1994). «Knowing, managing, and learning». Management Learning, vol. 25, nº 3, pp. 387-412.
  • STERNBERG, R. (2009). «Regional dimensions of entrepreneurship». Foundations and Trends (R) in Entrepreneurship, vol. 5, nº 4, pp. 211-340.
  • TALLMAN, S.; JENKINS, M., HENRY, N., & PINCH, S. (2004). «Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage». Academy of Management Review, vol, 29, nº 2, pp. 258-271.
  • TEECE, D.J. (1986). «Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy». Research Policy, vol. 15, nº 6, pp. 285-305.
  • TEECE, D.J. (2007). «Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, nº 13, pp. 1319-1350.
  • TEECE, D. J.; PISANO, G.P. & SHUEN, A. (1997). «Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, nº 7, pp. 509-533.
  • UYARRA, E. (2010). «Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, implications and contradictions». European Planning Studies, 18, nº 8, pp. 1227-1246.
  • VORLEY, T. & NELLES, J. (2008). «Reconceptualising the academy: Institutional development of and beyond the Third Mission.» Higher Education Management and Policy, vol. 20, nº 3, pp. 1-17.
  • WENNBERG, K.; WIKLUND, J. & WRIGHT, M. (2011). «The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, vol. 40, nº 8, pp. 1128-1143.
  • WRIGHT, M.; CLARYSSE, B.; LOCKETT, A., & KNOCKAERT, M. (2008). «Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries». Research Policy, vol. 37, nº 8, pp. 1205-1223.
  • WRIGHT, M.; LOCKETT, A.; CLARYSSE, B. & BINKS, M. (2006). «University spin-out companies and venture capital». Research Policy, vol. 35, nº 4, pp. 481-501.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet