Comparison of different ways of computing grades in continuous assessment into the final grade

Referencias bibliográficas

• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
• Bliuc, A. M., Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., & Piggott, L. (2011). A blended learning approach to teaching foreign policy: Student experiences of learning through face-to-face and online discussion and their relationship to academic performance. Computers and Education, 56(3), 856-864. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.027
• Bliuc, A. M., Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., & Piggott, L. (2010). Learning through face-to-face and online discussions: Associations between students' conceptions, approaches and academic performance in political science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 512-524. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00966.x
• Dalziel, J. (1998). Using marks to assess student performance, some problems and alternatives. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 351-366. doi:10.1080/0260293980230403
• Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 365-377.
• Gibbs, J. C., & Taylor, J. D. (2016). Comparing student self-assessment to individualized instructor feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 111-123. doi:10.1177/1469787416637466
• González-Marcos, A., Alba-Elías, F., Navaridas-Nalda, F., & Ordieres-Meré, J. (2016). Student evaluation of a virtual experience for project management learning: An empirical study for learning improvement. Computers and Education, 102, 172-187. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.08.005
• Green, R. A., Farchione, D., Hughes, D. L., & Chan, S. P. (2014). Participation in asynchronous online discussion forums does improve student learning of gross anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7(1), 71-76. doi:10.1002/ase.1376
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4º ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation (Vol. 50). London: SAGE.
• Knight, P. T. (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275-286. doi:10.1080/03075070220000662
• Knight, P. T., & Banks, W. M. (2003). The assessment of complex learning outcomes. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 7(1), 39-49.
• Losilla, J. M., Navarro, J. B., Palmer, A., Rodrigo, M. F., & Ato, M. (2005). Análisis de datos. Del contraste de hipótesis al modelado estadístico. Barcelona: Edicions a Petició.
• Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2009). Los alumnos y los profesores como evaluadores. Aplicación a la calificación de presentaciones orales. Revista Espanola De Pedagogia, 67(242), 79-97.
• Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2017). Protocol: Inter-rater and intra-rater consistency validation of a rubric to assess oral presentation skills for university students. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), (in press).
• Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Santandreu-Mascarell, C. (2015). What do we know about rubrics used in higher education? Intangible Capital, 11(1), 118-145. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.
• Marin-Garcia, J. A., Aragonés Beltran, P., & Melón, G. (2014). Intra-rater and inter-rater consistency of pair wise comparison in evaluating the innovation competency for university students. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 5(2), 24-46. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v5i2.3220
• Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Sabater, J. P., Morant Llorca, J., & Conejero, J. A. (2016). Passam: Peer assessment and monitoring system. Paper presented at the Congreso Nacional de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red- Universitat Politècnica de València-Valencia 07/07/16 al 08/07/16.
• Marin-Garcia, J. A., Martínez-Gómez, M., & Giraldo-O'Meara, M. (2014). Redesigning work in university classrooms: Factors related to satisfaction in engineering and business administration students. Intangible Capital, 10(5), 1026-1051.
• Marin-Garcia, J. A., Ramirez Bayarri, L., & Atares-Huerta, L. (2015). Protocol: Comparing advantages and disadvantages of rating scales, behavior observation scales and paired comparison scales for behavior assessment of competencies in workers. A systematic literature review. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 2(6), 49-63. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v6i2.4032
• Medina-López, C., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2011). Research in operations management teaching: Trends and challenges. Intangible Capital, 7(2), 507-548.
• Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9(0), 129-144.
• Perello-Marin, M. R., Vidal-Carreras, P. I., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2016). What do undergraduates perceive about teamwork? International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 1171-1181.
• Perez-Benedito, J. L., Perez-Alvarez, J., & Casati, M. J. (2015). Pbl in the teaching of design in aeronautical engineering: Application and evolution of a consolidated methodology. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 199-208.
• Potgieter, M., Ackermann, M., & Fletcher, L. (2010). Inaccuracy of self-evaluation as additional variable for prediction of students at risk of failing first-year chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(1), 17-24. doi:10.1039/c001042c
• Pratten, M. K., Merrick, D., & Burr, S. A. (2014). Group in- course assessment promotes cooperative learning and increases performance. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7(3), 224-233. doi:10.1002/ase.1397
• Sanna, A., Lamberti, F., Paravati, G., & Demartini, C. (2012). Automatic assessment of 3d modeling exams. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(1), 2-10. doi:10.1109/tlt.2011.4
• Tejeiro, R. A., Gómez-Vallecillo, J. L., Romero, A. F., Pelegrina, M., Wallace, A., & Emberley, E. (2012). Summative self-assessment in higher education: Implications of its counting towards the final mark. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(2), 789-812.
• Trotter, E. (2006). Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(5), 505-521. doi:10.1080/02602930600679506
• Trullas, I., & Enache, M. (2011). Theoretical analysis of the antecedents and the consequences of students' identification with their university and their perception of quality. Intangible Capital, 7(1), 170-212. doi:10.3926/ic.2011.v7n1.p170-212
• Valle, A. R. A., Gonzalvo, M. J. M., & Abril, F. S. (2011). Is there an alternative to master classes? An ocular physiology experience as part of an optics and optometry degree course. Arbor, 187(EXTRA 3), 189-194. doi:10.3989/arbor.2011.Extra-3n3143
• Viles Diez, E., Zárraga-Rodríguez, M., & Jaca García, C. (2013). Tool to assess teamwork performance in higher education. Intangible Capital; Vol 9, No 1 (2013)DO - 10.3926/ic.399.
• Walker, D. J., & Palmer, E. (2011). The relationship between student understanding, satisfaction and performance in an australian engineering programme. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 157-170. doi:10.1080/02602930903221451
• Watts, F., García-Carbonell, A., & Llorens, J. (2006). Introducción a la evaluación compartida: Investigación multidisciplinar. In F. Watts & A. García-Carbonell (Eds.), La evaluación compartida: Investigación multidisciplinar (1 ed., pp. 1-9). Valencia: Editorial de la UPV
• Yorke, M. (1998). The management of assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 101-116.
• Yorke, M. (2010). How finely grained does summative assessment need to be? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 677-689. doi:10.1080/03075070903243118
• Yorke, M. (2011). Summative assessment: Dealing with the 'measurement fallacy'. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 251-573. doi:10.1080/03075070903545082