High involvement work programs (HIWP) measurement model validation and its capacity to predict perceived performance

  1. Amable Juárez Tárraga 1
  2. Juan A. Marin Garcia 1
  3. Cristina Santandreu Mascarell 1
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01460j859

Journal:
Intangible Capital

ISSN: 1697-9818

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 12

Issue: 5

Pages: 1308-1400

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3926/IC.837 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Intangible Capital

Abstract

Purpose: one of the objectives of the work is the validation of a measurement model of the HIWP (High Involvement Work programs) based on Lawler (1986) questionnaire. Our proposal presents a second order composite construct for HIWP, in which the four first-order constructs that characterize the model (Communication, Training, Compensation and Participation) are composite constructs. After addressing the validation of the measurement model, it is also checked the structure model to assess the predictive ability of HIWP on perceived performance in three different samples from different countries Design/methodology/approach: To validate the model based on composites, partial least squares (PLS-SEM) was used. Data were obtained by researchers who developed the official versions of the questionnaire in English and Castilian Findings: Overall, this study contributes to the debate on the relationship HIWP-results, pointing to a possible predictive capacity of Lawler’s HIWP model on perceived performance. Our study confirms significant (although low) relationship between the use of HIWP and performance. But nevertheless, part of measurement model has not been fully validated and should be confirmed in future research. Research limitations/implications: First, our data come from studies of more than 15 years ago, but to test measurement models, the date of the data is not a significant limitation because we analyzed the relationship between the constructs and were not interested in describing the state of evolution of these practices, but how to measure this relationship. Moreover, we only have data from large companies in both countries so we can not generalize the findings to other contexts. Originality/value: The findings are important for practitioners and researchers because quantifies the relationship between the use of HIWP and performance in two countries with important cultural differences, and also identifies practices that contribute most to this positive relationship.

Bibliographic References

  • Arthur, J.B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of management Journal, 37(3), 670-687. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&db=buh&AN=9412131793&site=ehost-live&scope=site http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256705.
  • Barroso Castro, M.C., Cepeda Carrión, G.A., & Roldán Salgueiro, J.L. (2007). Constructos latentes y agregados en la economía de la empresa. Asociación Española de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM). Retrieved from: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=2487672.
  • Becker, B.E., & Huselid, M.A. (2006). Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here?. Journal of management, 32(6), 898-925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206306293668.
  • Benson, G.S., Young, S.M., & Lawler III, E.E. (2006). High-involvement work practices and analysts' forecasts of corporate earnings. Human resource management, 45(4), 519-537. Retrieved from Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20130.
  • Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67-94. Retrieved from Wiley-Blackwell: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=17649112&site=ehost-live&scope=site http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x
  • Bowen, D.E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the "Strengt" of the HRM System. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-221. Retrieved from: http://amr.aom.org/content/29/2/203.abstract
  • Boxall, P. (2012). High-performance work systems: What, why, how and for whom?. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 169-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2011.00012.x
  • Camps, J., & Luna-Arocas, R. (2009). High involvement work practices and firm performance. International journal of human resource management, 20(5), 1056-1077. Retrieved from Routledge: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=4062 8014&site=ehost-live&scope=site http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190902850273.
  • Cappelli, P., & Neumark, D. (2001). Do "High-Performance" Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 54(4), 737-775. Retrieved from: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/54/4/737.abstract http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001979390105400401.
  • Cepeda, G., & Roldán, J.L. (2004). Aplicando en la práctica la técnica PLS en la administración de empresas. Conocimiento y Competitividad. XIV Congreso Nacional ACEDE.Murcia (pp. 74-78).
  • Combs, J., Liu, Y.M., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel psychology, 59(3), 501-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x
  • Conci, G. (2012). Perceived results obtained by companies associated to the use of high involvement work practices (HIWP). Working Papers on Operations Management, 3(1), 01-15. Retrieved from: http://ojs.upv.es/index.php/WPOM/article/view/1065 http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v3i1.1065.
  • Coye, R.W., & Belohlav, J.A. (1995). An Exploratory Analysis of Employee Participation. Group & Organization Management, 20(1), 4-17. Retrieved from: http://gom.sagepub.com/content/20/1/4.abstract http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601195201002.
  • Datta, D.K., Guthrie, J.P., & Wright, P.M. (2005). Human Resource Management and Labor Productivity: Does Industry Matter?. Academy of management Journal, 48(1), 135-145. Retrieved from: http://amj.aom.org/content/48/1/135.abstract http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993158.
  • Drehmer, D.E., Belohlav, J.A., & Coye, R.W. (2000). An Exploration of Employee Participation Using a Scaling Approach. Group & Organization Management, 25(4), 397-418. Retrieved from: http://gom.sagepub.com/content/25/4/397.abstract http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601100254005.
  • Ericksen, J.E.F. (2007). High performance work systems, dynamic workforce alignment, and firm performance. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings (pp. 1-6) Academy of Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26518272.
  • Guerrero, S., & Barraud-Didier, V. (2004). High-involvement practices and performance of French firms. International journal of human resource management, 15(8), 1408-1423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958519042000258002.
  • Guest, D.E. (2011). Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(1), 3-13. Retrieved from Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00164.x
  • Guthrie, J.P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of management Journal, 44(1), 180-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069345.
  • Guthrie, J.P., Spell, C.S., & Nyamori, R.O. (2002). Correlates and consequences of high involvement work practices: The role of competitive strategy. International journal of human resource management, 13(1), 183-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190110085071.
  • Hair, J.F. Jr., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing. ISBN 9781452217444.
  • Hair, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1Gçô2), 1-12. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630113000022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001.
  • Huselid, M.A. (1995). The impact of human-resource management-practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 38(3), 635-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256741.
  • Huselid, M.A., & Becker, B.E. (1996). Methodological issues in cross-sectional and panel estimates of the human resource-firm performance link. Industrial relations, 35(3), 400-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232x.1996.tb00413.x
  • Jarvis, C., Mackenzie, S., & Podsakoff, P. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/376806.
  • Jiang, K., Lepak, D.P., Hu, J., & Baer, J.C. (2012). How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms. Academy of management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294. Retrieved from: http://amj.aom.org/content/55/6/1264.abstract http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088.
  • Jiang, K., Takeuchi, R., & Lepak, D.P. (2013). Where do We Go From Here? New Perspectives on the Black Box in Strategic Human Resource Management Research. Journal of management studies, 50(8), 1448-1480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joms.12057.
  • Lawler III, E.E. (1986). High-Involvement Management. Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
  • Lawler, E.E. (2005). From human resource management to organizational effectiveness. Human resource management, 44(2), 165-169. Retrieved from Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20059.
  • Lawler III, E.E., Mohrman, S., & Benson, G. (2001). Organizing for high performance: Employee involvement, TQM, reengineering, and knowledge management in the fortune 1000. The CEO report Jossey-Bass.
  • Lawler III, E.E., Mohrman, S., & Ledford, G. (1998). Strategies for high performance organizations: Employee involvement, TQM, and reengineering programs in fortune 1000 coporations. Jossey-Bass.
  • Marin-Garcia, J.A., Bonavía Martín, T., & Miralles Insa, C. (2008). The use of employee participation in the USA and Spanish companies. International Journal of Management Scienceand Engineering Management, 3(1), 71-80. Retrieved from: http://www.worldacademicunion.com/journal/MSEM/online.htm
  • Marin-Garcia, J.A. (2013). ¿Qué sabemos sobre la relación de los programas de recursos humanos de alto rendimiento y el desempeño organizativo? (What do we know about the relationship between High Involvement Work Practices and Performance? WPOM-Working Papers On Operations Management, 4(2), 01-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v4i2.1552. Retrieved from: http://ojs.upv.es/index.php/WPOM/article/view/1552.
  • Marin-Garcia, J.A., & Conci, G. (2009). Exploratory study of high involvement work practices: Identification of the dimensions and proposal of questionnaire to measure the degree of use in the company. Intangible Capital, 5(3), 278-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.2009.v5n3.p278-300.
  • Marin-Garcia, J.A., & Conci, G. (2010). Análisis factorial exploratorio para identificar las dimensiones subyacentes de los constructos de remuneración y participación. Working Papers on Operations Management, 1(1), 46-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v1i1.795.
  • Marin-Garcia, J.A., & Conci, G. (2012). Verification of the reflective model of first order factors for reward and empowerment constructs based on questionnaires derived from Lawler et al. (1991). Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 5(2), 473-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.454.
  • Marin-Garcia, J.A., & Conci, G. (2013). Validación de un cuestionario para medir el grado de uso de las prácticas de alta implicación de los trabajadores. Intangible capital, 9(3), 854-882. Retrieved from: http://www.raco.cat/index.php/Intangible/article/view/273491.
  • Nishii, L.H., Lepak, D.P., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the "why" of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61(3), 503-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00121.x. Retrieved from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-49149130883&partnerID=40&md5=b3eef8b1cdffac81f10451d18217639b
  • Paul, A.K., & Anantharaman, R.N. (2003). Impact of people management practices on organizational performance: Analysis of a causal model. International journal of human resource management, 14(7), 1246-1266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958519032000145648. Retrieved from Routledge: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=10917483&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  • Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3.2.3 (Version 3.2.3). Retrieved from: http://www.smartpls.com
  • Subramony, M. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human resource management, 48(5), 745-768. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=44435603&site=ehost-live&scope=site http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20315.
  • Wright, P.M., Gardner, T.M., Moynihan, L.M., & Allen, M.R. (2005). The relationship between HR practices and firm performance: Examining causal order. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 409-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00487.x
  • Yu, C., Finegold, D., Lawler, E., & Cochran, D. (2000). Does cultural fit matter? The adoption and effectiveness of employee involvement practices in China and the United States. Current Topics In Management, 5, 283-304.
  • Zheng, C., Morrison, M., & O'Neill, G. (2006). An empirical study of high performance HRM practices in Chinese SMEs. International journal of human resource management, 17(10), 1772-1803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190600965282. Retrieved from Routledge: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=22832862&site=ehost-live&scope=site