Validación de las escalas de características del puesto de trabajo aplicadas a entornos educativos universitarios

Referencias bibliográficas

• ANDERSON, J.C.; GERBING, D.W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
• ANSON, C.M.; BERNOLD, L.D.; CROSSLAND, C.; SPURLIN, J.; MCDERMOTH, M.A.; WEISS, S. (2003). Empowerment to Learn in Engineering: Preparation for an Urgently-Needed Paradigm Shift. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 7: 145-156.
• ARMSTRONG, M.J. (2003). Students as Clients: A Professional Services Model for Business Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2: 371-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2003.11901964
• BENTLER, P.M.; BONETT, D.G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88: 606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.88.3.588
• BOONZAIER, B.; FICKER, B.; RUST, B. (2001). A Review of Research on the Job Characteristics Model and the Attendant Job Diagnostic Survey. South African Journal of Buisiness Management, 32: 11-24.
• BUYS, M.A.; OLCKERS, A.; SCHAAP, P. (2007). The Construct Validity of The Revised Job Diagnostic Survey. South African Journal of Business Management, 38: 33-40.
• CAMPBELL, D.T.; FISKE, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
• CAMPION, M.A. (1988). Interdisciplinary Approaches to Job Design: A Constructive Replications with Extensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 467-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.467
• CORDERY, J.L.; SEBASTOS, P.P. (1993). Responses to the Original and Revised Job Diagnostic Survey: Is Education a Factor in Responses to Negatively Worded Items. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 141-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.141
• DEVARO, J.; LEE, R.; BROOKSHIRE, D. (2007). Analysing the Job Characteristics Model: New Support from a cross-section of Establishment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18: 986-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190701321211
• DIEGO VALLEJO, R.D.; DIEGO VALLEJO, J.A.; OLIVAR PARRA, S. (2001). Job Satisfaction in Banking Workers. Psicothema, 13: 629-635.
• DONALDSON, L. (2002). Damn by Our Own Theories: Contradictions Between Theories and Management Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1: 96-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2002.7373701
• DOVAL DIEGUEZ, E.; VILADRICH SEGUÉS, M.C. (2011). Desarrollo y adaptación de cuestionarios en el ámbito de la salud. Bellaterra: Laboratori d'Estadística Aplicada i de Modelització (UAB).
• FELDER, R.M.; FELDER, G.N.; DIETZ, E.J. (1997). A longitudinal study of Alternative Approaches to Engineering Education: Survey of Assessment Results, Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference. Journal of Engineering Education, 87: 469-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00381.x
• FORNACIARI, C.J.; DEAN, K.L. (2005). Experiencing Organizational Work Design: Beyond Hackman and Oldham. Journal of Management Education, 29: 631-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1052562904273378
• FORNELL, C.; LARCKER, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312
• FREED, J.E. (2005). Creating a Total Quality Environment (TQE) for Learning. Journal of Management Education, 29: 60-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1052562904264283
• FUERTES MARTÍNEZ, F.; MUNDUATE JACA, L.; FORTEA BAGÁN M.Á. (1996). Análisis y Rediseño de Puestos (adaptación española del cuestionario Job Diagnostic Survey).Universidad Jaime I, Castellón..
• FURNHAM, A.; ERACLEOUS, A.; CHAMORRO-PREMUZIC, T. (2010). Personality, motivation and job satisfaction: Hertzberg meets the Big Five. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2:, 765-779. GARCÍA-CUETO, E.; GALLO ÁLVARO, P.; MIRANDA, R. (1998). Bondad de Ajuste en el Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio. Psicothema, 3: 717-724.
• GONZÁLEZ, L. (1997). Estructura Factorial y Propiedades Psicométricas de la Versión Castellana del "Job Diagnostic Survey" (JDS). Psicológica, 18: 227-251.
• GREMLER, D.D.; MCCOLLOUGH, M.A. (2011). Student Satisfaction Guarantees: An Empirical Examination of Attitudes, Antecedents, and Consequences. Journal of Marketing Education, 24: 150-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027753024002008
• GRIFFIN, R.W. (1991). Effects of Work Redesign on Employee Perceptions, attitudes and behaviors: A long-term Investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 425-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256449
• HACKMAN, J.R.; OLDHAM, G.R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 159-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
• HACKMAN, J.R.; OLDHAM, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the Design of the Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 250-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
• HACKMAN, J.R.; OLDHAM, G.R. (1980). Work Redesign. Addison-Wesley.
• HAIR, J.F.; ANDERSON, R.E.; THATAM, R.L.; BLACK, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Prentice Hall International, INC.
• HOGAN, E.A.; MARTELL, D.A. (1987). A Confirmatory Structural Equations Analysis of the Job Characteristics Model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39: 242-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90040-9
• IDASZAK, J.R.; BOTTOM, W. P.; DRASGOW, F. (1988). A Test of the Measurement Equivalence of the Revised Job Diagnostic Survey: Past Problems and Current Solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 647-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.647
• MARTÍNEZ, J.L.; MARTÍNEZ, L. (2008). Determinación de la máxima varianza para el cálculo del Factor de Imprecisión sobre la Escala de Medida (FIEM), y extensión a diferentes tipos de muestreo. Psicothema, 20: 311-316.
• MARTÍNEZ-GÓMEZ, M.; MARIN-GARCIA, J.A. (2009). Como medir y guiar el cambio hacia entornos educativos universitarios más motivadores para los alumnos. Formación Universitaria, 2: 3-14.
• MORGESON, F.P.; HUMPHREY, S.E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 1321-1339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
• O'NEIL, D.A.; HOPKINS, M.M. (2002). The Teacher as Couch Approach: Pedagogical Choices for Management Educators. Journal of Management Education, 26: 402-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105256290202600406
• RENN, R.W.; SWIERCZ, P.M.; ICENOGLE, M.L. (1993). Measurement Properties of the Revised Job Diagnostic Survey: More Promising News from the Public Sector. Educational and psychological measurement, 53(4): 1011-1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053004014
• ROBERTS, K.H.; GLICK, W. (1981). The Job Characteristics Approach to Task Design: A Critical Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66: 193-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.66.2.193
• SANTOS REGO, M.Á.; GODÁS OTERO, A.; LORENZO MOLEDO, M.; GÓMEZ FRAGUELA, J.A. (2010). Eficacia y Satisfacción Laboral de los Profesores no Universitarios: Revisión de un Instrumento de Medida. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 245: 151-168.
• STANTON, J.M.; BACHIOCHI, P.D.; ROBIE, C.; PÉREZ, L.M.; SMITH, P.C. (2002). Revising the JDI work satisfaction subscale: Insights into stress and control. Educational and psychological measurement, 62: 877-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316402236883
• TABER, T.D.; TAYLOR, E. (1990). A Review and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Personnel Psychology, 43(3): 467-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744- 6570.1990.tb02393.x
• TOMÁS, J.M.; OLIVER, A.; HONTANGAS, P.M. (2000). Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio de Segundo Orden y Mátrices Multirrasgo-Multimétodo. Psicothema, 12: 534-539.
• ULLMAN, J.B.; BENTLER, P.M. (2004). Structural Equation Modeling. In M.Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of Data Analysis (pages 431-458). SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608184.n19