Una sistematización de los instrumentos de medida de la calidad de la investigación

  1. Medina-López, Carmen
  2. Marin-Garcia, Juan A.
  3. Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela
Zeitschrift:
WPOM

ISSN: 1989-9068

Datum der Publikation: 2012

Ausgabe: 3

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 28-45

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.4995/WPOM.V3I1.1104 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: WPOM

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Given the need to provide proof of the quality of research done and the impact that publications have in the professional and academic environment, researchers increasingly need to become acquainted with the different tools that exist. The objective of this paper is to systematize and review the main resources that give indications of the quality of research that are currently accepted by the scientific-academic community.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Buela-Casal, G. (2004). Assessing the quality of articles and scientific journals: Proposal for weighted impact factor and a quality index. Psychology in Spain, Vol. 8, pp. 60–76.
  • Cabezas-Clavijo, A.; Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2012). ¿Es posible usar Google Scholar para evaluar las revistas científicas nacionales en los ámbitos de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas? El caso de las revistas españolas. EC3 Working Papers, Vol. 3, No. 23 de abril. Consultado el 11/06/2012. Disponible en http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16888
  • Casati, F.; Giunchiglia, F.; Marchese, M. (2007). Publish and perish: why the current publication and review model is killing research and wasting your money. ACM Ubiquity, Vol. 8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1217821.1226695.
  • Day, A. (2007). How to get research published in journals. England: Gower Publishing Limited.
  • Delgado-López-Cózar, E.; Marcos Cartagena, D., Cabezas-Clavijo, A.; Jiménez-Contreras, E. y Ruiz-Pérez, R. (2012). Índice H de las revistas españolas de Ciencias Sociales según Google Scholar (2001-2010). Consultado el 11/06/2012. Disponible en http://hdl.handle.net/10481/20235
  • González-Pereira, B.; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 379-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002
  • Harzing, A.W. (2010) The Publish or Perish Book. Published by Tarma Software Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Hussain, S. (2011). Food for Thought on the ABS Academic Journal Quality Guide. Accounting Education, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 545-559.
  • Kaltenborn, K. F.; Kuhn, K. (2004). The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas, Vol. 96, pp. 460–476.
  • Lluch, J. (2005). Some considerations on the use of the impact factor of scientific journals as a tool to evaluate research in psychology. Scientometrics, Vol. 65, pp. 189–197.
  • Manske, P. R. (2004). The impact of the impact factor. The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 29A, pp. 983–986.
  • Moed, H.F. (2010) Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 265-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002
  • Togia, A.; Tsigilis, N. (2006). Impact factor and education journals: a critical examination analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 45, pp. 362-379.
  • Torres-Salinas, D.; Bordons, M.; Giménez-Toledo, E.; Delgado-López-Cózar, E.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.; Sanz-Casado. E. (2010). Clasificación integrada de revistas científicas (CIRC): propuesta de categorización de las revistas en ciencias sociales y humanas. El profesional de la información, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 675-683. Consultado el 11/06/2012. Disponible en http://epuc.cchs.csic.es/circ/epi_n19.pdf
  • West, J.D. (2010). Eigenfactor: ranking and mapping scientific knowledge, PhD Dissertation. University of Washington. Consultado el 11/06/2012. Disponible en http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/people/jevin/Documents/Dissertation_JevinWest.pdf
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet