User behavior in Smart and Sustainable Offices (SSO)

  1. Kozusznik, M. W.
  2. Soriano, A.
  3. Peiró, J. M.ª
Revista:
Informes de la construcción

ISSN: 0020-0883

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 69

Número: 548

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/ID.55194 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Informes de la construcción

Resumen

Las oficinas inteligentes y sostenibles (SSO) requieren sinergias entre las tecnologías y los comportamientos de los usuarios. El enfoque sociotécnico considera los motivos, las actitudes, las cogniciones y los comportamientos de los usuarios al diseñar entornos de trabajo. Esta nota describirá esos fenómenos en entornos de oficina. También presentará un conjunto de herramientas para evaluar esos fenómenos y proporcionará pautas para mejorarlos.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This study has been carried out within the framework of the Climate-KIC “INN_TBE: Building technologies accelerator (BTA), CPI-14-372” [2014/10500]. Also, the preparation of this MS has been supported by the MINNECO 2012 grant (PSI2012-36557) and by the PROMETEO 2012/048 project granted by the Valencian Regional Ministry. We thank prof. Alicia Salvador for her feedback while preparing this manuscript.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • (1) Anderson, K. (1998). Epidemiological approach to indoor air problems. Indoor Air, 4, 32-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1998.tb00005.x
  • (2) Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psychosocial determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
  • (3) Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • (4) Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. London, UK: Academic Press. PMCid:PMC327369
  • (5) Boyce, P. R., Veitch, J. A., Newsham, G. R., Jones, C. C., Heerwagen, J., Myer, M., & Hunter, C. M. (2006). Lighting quality and office work: two field simulation experiments. Lighting Research & Technology, 38(3), 191-223. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782806lrt161oa
  • (6) Brown, Z. & Cole, R.J. (2009). Influence of occupants' knowledge on comfort expectations and behavior. Building Research & Information, 37(3), 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210902794135
  • (7) Cantril, H., 1966. The Pattern of Human Concerns. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
  • (8) Constanzo, M., Archer, D., Aronson, E., & Pettigrew, T. (1986). Energy conservation behavior. The difficult path from information to action. American Psychologist, 41(5), 521-528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.5.521
  • (9) DeCroon, E., Sluiter, J., Kuijer, P. P., Frings-Dresen, M. (2005). The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics 48(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130512331319409 PMid:15764312
  • (10) DeMeo, E. A., & Taylor, R. W. (1984). Solar photovoltaic power systems: An electric utility R&D perspective. Science, 224(4646), 245-251.
  • (11) Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C., Van Dierendonck, D. (2006). Adaptación espa-ola de las escalas de bienestar psicológico de Ryff, Psicothema, 18(3), 572-577. PMid:17296089
  • (12) Dolan. P., Layard. R. & Metcalfe. R. (2011). Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: Recommendations on measures. Office for National Statistics.
  • (13) Fisk, W. J. (2000). Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(1), 537-566. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.537
  • (14) Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986/87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
  • (15) Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., Schwarz, N. & Stone, A.A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science, 306, (5702) 1776-1780. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103572 PMid:15576620
  • (16) Kaiser, F. G., Wolfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1996, August). Environmental Attitude and Ecological Behavior. Paper presented at the 104th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (APA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • (17) Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
  • (18) Kolodny, H. F., & Dresner, B. (1987). Linking arrangements and new work designs. Organizational Dynamics, 14(3), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(86)90030-6
  • (19) Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2005). Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.001
  • (20) Lindenberg, S. & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x
  • (21) Linhart, F., & Scartezzini, J. (2011). Evening office lighting – visual comfort vs. energy efficiency vs. performance? Building & Environment, 46(5), 981-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.002
  • (22) Lo, S.H., Peters, G.J., & Kok, G. (2011). Energy-related behaviors in office buildings: A qualitative study on individual and organisational determinants. Applied Psychology: An international review, online first.
  • (23) Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization's bottom line? Personnel Psychology, 64, 559-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01219.x
  • (24) Mumford, E. (2006). The story of socio-technical design: Reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Information Systems Journal, 16(4), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00221.x
  • (25) Office of Technology Assessment. (1982). Energy efficiency of buildings in cities. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.
  • (26) Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
  • (27) OECD (2013). OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264191655-en https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-en
  • (28) Owens, S., & Driffill, L. (2008). How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy. Energy Policy, 36, 4412-4418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.031
  • (29) Pasmore, W. A. (1995). Social science transformed: The socio-technical perspective. Human Relations, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800101
  • (30) Pava, C. H. (1983). Managing new office technology: An organizational strategy. Free Press, New York, 1983. PMid:10262864
  • (31) Peiró, J. (1991). Psicología de la Organización 2-1 y 2-2. Unidad didáctica IV. Universidad de Valencia. PMCid:PMC1014583
  • (32) Petch, J., & Reeve, D. E. (1999). GIS, organisations and people: A socio-technical approach. CRC Press.
  • (33) Rice, A. (1958). Productivity and social organization: The Ahmedabad experiment. London: Tavistock Publications.
  • (34) Rashid, M., & Zimring, C. (2008). A review of the empirical literature on the relationships between indoor environment and stress in health care and office settings problems and prospects of sharing evidence. Environment and Behavior, 40, 151-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507311550
  • (35) Ross, M. H., & Williams, R. H. (1981). Our energy: Regaining control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • (36) Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
  • (37) Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
  • (38) Solar Energy Research Institute. (1981). A new prosperity: Building a sustainable energy future. Andover, MA: Brick House.
  • (39) Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
  • (40) Trist, E. L., Higgin, G. W., Murray, H., & Pollock, A. B. (1963). Organizational choice: Capabilities of groups at the coal face under changing technologies: The loss, re-discovery & transformation of a work tradition. London: Tavistock.
  • (41) Trist, E., & Bamforth, K. (1951). Sorne social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4, 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101
  • (42) Turner, G., & Myerson, J. (1998). New workspace, new culture: office design as a catalyst for change. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
  • (43) Van Eijnatten, M.F. (1992). An Anthology of the Socio-Technical System Design Paradigm. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology Press.
  • (44) Veitch, J. A., Newsham, G. R., Boyce, P. R., & Jones, C. C. (2008). Lighting appraisal, well-being and performance in open-plan offices: A linked mechanisms approach. Lighting Research & Technology, 40(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153507086279
  • (45) Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2000). Exercised control, lighting choices, and energy use: An office simulation experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 219-237. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0169
  • (46) Veitch, J. A., Stokkermans, M. M., & Newsham, G. R. (2013). Linking Lighting Appraisals to Work Behaviors. Environment & Behavior, 45(2), 198-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511420560
  • (47) Vilnai-Yavetz, I., Rafaeli, A., & Yaacov, C.S. (2005). Instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism of office design. Environment and Behavior, 37(4), 533-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504270695
  • (48) Vischer, J. C. (2007). The effects of the physical environment on job performance: towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and Health, 23, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1134
  • (49) Walker, C. R., & Guest, R. H. (1952). The man on the assembly line. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674599949
  • (50) Ward, A., Jones, A., & Hopper, A. (1997). A new location technique for the active office. IEEE Personal Communications, 4(5), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/98.626982
  • (51) Warr, P., Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1979.tb00448.x
  • (52) White, M. P., & Dolan, P. (2009). Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1000-1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02392.x PMid:19549079
  • (53) Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
  • (54) Windlinger, L., Janser, M., Feige, A., & Wallbaum, H. (2012). The role of office users in the sustainability of office buildings–an empirical investigation and implications for FM. In 7th international conference on improving energy efficiency in commercial buildings, April 2012, Frankfurt.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet