Análisis crítico sobre los efectos de las tecnologías digitales en la lectura y el aprendizaje

  1. Ladislao Salmerón 1
  2. Pablo Delgado 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revue:
Culture and Education, Cultura y Educación

ISSN: 1135-6405,  1578-4118

Année de publication: 2019

Volumen: 31

Número: 3

Pages: 472-480

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1080/11356405.2019.1630958 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Culture and Education, Cultura y Educación

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

In the digital age, the introduction of digital technologies (or information and communication technologies, ICT) in classrooms is a necessary, imperative reality. However, the educational results do not seem to match the expectations generated. For this reason, this revision seeks to make up for the scant attention paid to the possible harmful effects of the use of ICT based on research and educational practice. After providing a general overview of the impact of ICT on learning, we survey the results of studies that reveal potential negative consequences of their use inside and outside the school context. We analyse their impact on both academic performance and other more specific areas, such as reading comprehension, and we stress the negative effects on so-called ‘digital natives’. In short, what stands out is the importance of an evidence-based education practice which bears in mind the possible harmful effects of using ICT and bears in mind that its beneficial effects seem to rely on not only how much but also how they are used.

€ Voir financement

Information sur le financement

Resumen: En la era digital, la introducción de las tecnologías digitales (o tecnologías de la información y comunicación, TIC) en las aulas es una realidad necesaria e imparable. Sin embargo, los resultados educativos no parecen cumplir con las expectativas generadas. Por ello, la presente revisión trata de cubrir la escasa atención prestada a los posibles efectos perjudiciales del uso de las TIC desde la investigación y la práctica educativa. Tras una exposición general del impacto de las TIC en el aprendizaje, se repasan los resultados de estudios que revelan posibles consecuencias negativas de su uso dentro y fuera del contexto escolar. Se analiza tanto el impacto en el rendimiento académico, como en otras áreas más específicas como la comprensión lectora, y se enfatizan los efectos negativos en los llamados ‘nativos digitales’. En definitiva, se resalta la importancia de una práctica educativa que, con base en la evidencia, tenga en English version: pp. 465–471 / Versión en español: pp. 472–478 References / Referencias: pp. 478–480 Translated from Spanish / Traducción del español: Mary Black Authors’ Address / Correspondencia con los autores: Ladislao Salmerón, ERI Lectura y Departamento de Psicología del Desarrollo y de la Educación, Universitat de València, Avd. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010 Valencia, España. E-mail: ladislao.salmeron@uv.es

Financeurs

Références bibliographiques

  • Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1816–1828. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Alves, R. A., Limpo, T., Fidalgo, R., Carvalhais, L., Pereira, L. Á., & Castro, S. L. (2016). The impact of promoting transcription on early text production: Effects on bursts and pauses, levels of written language, and writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 665–679. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D. (2017). Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 54–158. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Archer, K., Savage, R., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., Wood, E., Gottardo, A., & Chen, V. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 78, 140–149. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Argelagós, E., & Pifarré, M. (2012). Improving information problem solving skills in secondary education through embedded instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 515–526. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Borgonovi, F. (2016). Video gaming and gender differences in digital and printed reading performance among 15-year-olds students in 26 countries. Journal of Adolescence, 48, 45–61. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Camacho, M. (2017). Tablets en educación. Hacia un aprendizaje basado en competencias. Retrieved from http://blog.educalab.es/intef/2017/10/04/estudio-tabletas-en-educacion-hacia-un-aprendizaje-basado-en-competencias/ [Google Scholar]
  • Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Benitez, S., & Chang, J. (2009). Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 483–489. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Coscollola, M. D. (2011). Pizarra digital Interactiva en el aula: Uso y valoraciones sobre el aprendizaje. Estudios Sobre Educación, 20, 99–116. [Google Scholar]
  • de Pablos, J. (2008). Algunas reflexiones sobre las tecnologías digitales y su impacto social y educativo. Quaderns Digitals, 51, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Demirbilek, M., & Talan, T. (2017). The effect of social media multitasking on classroom performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19, 117–129. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Dindar, M., & Akbulut, Y. (2016). Effects of multitasking on retention and topic interest. Learning and Instruction, 41, 94–105. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Fajardo, I., Villalta, E., & Salmerón, L. (2016). ¿Son realmente tan buenos los nativos digitales? Relación entre las habilidades digitales y la lectura digital. Anales de Psicología, 32, 89–97. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age. The IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. Amsterdam: IEA. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Goodchild, T., & Speed, E. (2018). Technology enhanced learning as transformative innovation: A note on the enduring myth of TEL. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–16. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
  • Huang, C. (2018). Social network site use and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 119, 76–83. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • INTEF. (2017). Estudio “Tablets en educación. Hacia un aprendizaje basado en competencias”. Retrieved from http://blog.educalab.es/intef/2017/10/04/estudio-tabletas-en-educacion-hacia-un-aprendizaje-basado-en-competencias/ [Google Scholar]
  • Karpinski, A. C., Kirschner, P. A., Ozer, I., Mellott, J. A., & Ochwo, P. (2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European University students. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1182–1192. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Lee, Y. H., & Wu, J. Y. (2013). The indirect effects of online social entertainment and information seeking activities on reading literacy. Computers & Education, 67, 168–177. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Lenhard, W., Schroeders, U., & Lenhard, A. (2017). Equivalence of screen versus print reading comprehension depends on task complexity and proficiency. Discourse Processes, 54, 427–445. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Loh, K. K., Tan, B. Z. H., & Lim, S. W. H. (2016). Media multitasking predicts video-recorded lecture learning performance through mind wandering tendencies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 943–947. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Moisala, M., Salmela, V., Hietajärvi, L., Salo, E., Carlson, S., Salonen, O., … Alho, K. (2016). Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults. NeuroImage, 134, 113–121. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25, 1159–1168. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Naumann, J. (2015). A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation, and performance in digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 263–277. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • OECD. (2009). PISA 2009. Assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics, and science. Paris: Author. [Google Scholar]
  • OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Paris: Author. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] Pfost, M., Hattie, J., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2014). Individual differences in reading development: A review of 25 years of empirical research on Matthew effects in reading. Review of Educational Research, 84, 203–244. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Price, L., & Kirkwood, A. (2014). Using technology for teaching and learning in higher education: A critical review of the role of evidence in informing practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 33, 549–564. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Ravizza, S. M., Hambrick, D. Z., & Fenn, K. M. (2014). Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Computers & Education, 78, 109–114. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Ravizza, S. M., Uitvlugt, M. G., & Fenn, K. M. (2017). Logged in and zoned out: How laptop internet use relates to classroom learning. Psychological Science, 28, 171–180. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  • Salmerón, L. (2013). Actividades que promueven la transferencia de los aprendizajes: Una revisión de la literatura. Revista de Educación, volumen extraordinario 2013, 34–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Salmerón, L., García, A., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2018). The development of adolescents’ comprehension-based Internet reading skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 31–39. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Salmerón, L., & Llorens, A. (2018). Instruction of digital reading strategies based on eye-movements modeling examples. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57, 343–359. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H. I., Kammerer, Y., Stadtler, M., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Comprehension processes in digital reading. In M. Barzillai, J. Thomson, S. Schroeder, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 91–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Schleicher, A. (2015). School technology struggles to make an impact. BBC News, 15 September 2015. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34174795 [Google Scholar]
  • Sidorkin, M. A. (2017). Human capital and innovations in education. In A. M. Sidorkin, & M. K. Wardford (Eds.), Reforms and innovation in Education. Implications for the quality of human capital (pp. 127–129). Cham: Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Singer Trakhman, L. M., Alexander, P. A., & Berkowitz, L. E. (2017). Effects of processing time on comprehension and calibration in print and digital mediums. The Journal of Experimental Education. doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1411877 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Veen, W., & Vrakking, B. (2006). Homo zappiens: Growing up in a digital age. London: Network Continuum Education. [Google Scholar]
  • Vivancos, J. (2008). Tratamiento de la información y competencia digital. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. [Google Scholar]
  • Voorveld, H. A. M., & van der Groot, M. (2013). Age differences in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 392–408. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
La source de données: Dialnet