La entrevista política ante el sesgo audiovisualEl caso de Los desayunos de TVE (2018)

Referencias bibliográficas

• Amiel, V. (2005). Estética del montaje. Madrid: Abada.
• Angus, D.; Fitzgerald, R.; Atay, C. & Wiles, J. (2016). Using visual text analytics to examine broadcast interviewing. Discourse, Context y Media, 11, 38-49. http://doi.org/dz68
• Angus, D.; Rintel, S. & Wiles, J. (2013). Making sense of big text: a visual-first approach for analysing text data using Leximancer and Discursis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), 261-267. http://doi.org/dz69
• Atkinson, M. D.; Enos, R. D. y Hill, S. J. (2009). Candidate Faces and Election Outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4(3), 229–49. http://doi.org/bwp355
• Balàzs, B. (1987). El Film: evolución y esencia de un arte nuevo. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
• Banducci, S. A.; Karp, J. A.; Thrasher, M. & Rallings, C. (2008). Ballot Photographs a Cues in Low-Information Elections. Political Psychology, 29(6), 903–17. http://doi.org/bxdd2g
• Baum, M.A. & Groeling, T., (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25, 345--365. http://doi.org/c2nndq
• Baum, M.A. & Jamison, A.S. (2006). The Oprah effect: how soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently. The Journal of Politics, 68, 946--959. http://doi.org/dv3w5t
• Bavelas, J. B.; Black, A.; Bryson, L. & Mullett, J. (1988). Political equivocation: A situational explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 137–145. http://doi.org/fhzgrb
• Bavelas, J. B.; Black, A.; Chovil, N. & Mullet, J. (1990). Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
• Bell, P. & Van Leeuwen, T. (1994). The Media Interview: Confession, Contest, Conversation. Kensington, Australia: UNSW Press.
• Berggren, N.; Henrik Jordahl, H. & Poutvaara, P. (2010). The Looks of a Winner: Beauty and Electoral Success. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1–2), 8–15. http://doi.org/b2r9s7
• Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-311). Cambridge University Press. https://bit.ly/31c7Qhc
• Bull, P. (1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interview. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 115–131. http://doi.org/cnqqt6
• Bull, P. (2000). Equivocation and the rhetoric of modernization: An analysis of televised interviews with Tony Blair in the 1997 British General Election. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(2), 222-247. http://doi.org/b8vvsf
• Bull, P. (2002). Communication under the microscope: The theory and the practice of microanalysis. London: Routledge. http://doi.org/fh5m49
• Bull, P. & Mayer, K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 14(4), 651-666. http://doi.org/drsf8h
• Bull, P. & Elliott, J. (1998). Level of threat: Means of assessing interviewer toughness and neutrality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 220–244. http://doi.org/dwnm7b
• Bull, P.; Elliott, J.; Palmer, D. & Walker, L. (1996). Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 267–284. http://doi.org/bpkpn3
• Clayman, S. E. (1993). Reformulating the question: a device for answering/not answering questions in news interviews and press conferences’. Text, 13, 159-1 88. http://doi.org/d2dhkc
• Clayman, S. E. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in society, 30(3), 403-442. http://doi.org/ggxmht
• Clayman, S. E.; Elliott, M. N.; Heritage, J. & McDonald, L. L. (2006). Historical trends in questioning presidents, 1953-2000. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 561-583. http://doi.org/d2dhkc
• Clayman, S. & Heritage, J., (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/fg3xbd
• Clayman, S. E. & Whalen, J. (1989). When the medium becomes the message: the case of the Rather-Bush encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 241–272. http://doi.org/bqmvnz
• Coe, K.; Kenski, K. & Rains, S. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website commentary. Journal of Communication, 64, 658-679. http://doi.org/f6dxrx
• Cruttenden, A. (1986). Intonation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Day, R. (1961). Television: A Personal Report. London: Hutchinson.
• Dimitrova, D.V. & Strömbäck, J. (2012). Election news in Sweden and the United States: a comparative study of sources and media frames. Journalism, 13, 604-619. http://doi.org/fzs7mj
• Ekström, M. (2001). Politicians interviewed on television news. Discourse y Society, 12(5), 563-584. http://doi.org/fvvh94
• Ekström, M. & Kroon Lundell, Å. (2011). Beyond the broadcast interview: Specialized forms of interviewing in the making of television news. Journalism Studies, 12(2), 172-187. http://doi.org/bgzj9g
• Elliott, J. & Bull, P. (1996). A question of threat: face threats in questions posed during televised political interviews. Journal of community y applied social psychology, 6(1), 49-72. http://doi.org/dztcdr
• Emmertsen, S. (2007). Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 570-591. http://doi.org/btq6t8
• Feldman, O. & Kinoshita, K. (2019). Ignoring Respect: The Effects of Threat to Face on Replies and the Ensuing Questions During Broadcast Political Interviews in Japan. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(5-6), 606-627. http://doi.org/dz7b
• Feldman, O.; Kinoshita, K. & Bull, P. (2015). Culture or communicative conflict? The analysis of equivocation in broadcast Japanese political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 65-68. http://doi.org/f6rmf6
• Feldman, O.; Kinoshita, K. & Bull, P. (2016). Ducking and diving: How political issues affect equivocation in Japanese political interviews. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 17, 141-167. http://doi.org/dz7c
• Feldman, O.; Kinoshita, K. & Bull, P. (2017). Failures in leadership: How and why wishy-washy politicians equivocate on Japanese political interviews. Journal of language and politics, 16(2), 285-312. http://doi.org/dz7d
• Fetzer, A. & Weizman, E. (2006). Political discourse as mediated and public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(2), 143-153. http://doi.org/csqqbh
• Garcés, P. (2010). A gender approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics, (2), 46-94. http://doi.org/dcbtr5
• Gnisci, A. (2008). Coercive and Face‐Threatening Questions to Left‐Wing and Right‐Wing Politicians During Two Italian Broadcasts: Conversational Indexes of Par Conditio for Democracy Systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(5), 1179-1210. http://doi.org/d5xmp8
• Gnisci, A.; Di Conza, A. & Zollo, P. (2011). Political journalism as a democracy watchman. In P. Herrmann (Ed.), Democracy in Theory and Action (pp. 205-230). New York: NOVA Publishers.
• Gnisci, A.; Zollo, P.; Perugini, M. & Di Conza, A. (2013). A comparative study of toughness and neutrality in Italian and English political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 152-167. http://doi.org/dz7f
• Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction, Psychiatry, 18(3), 213-231. http://doi.org/gf89w7
• Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Selfin Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.
• Graber, D. A. (1996). Say it with pictures. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 546(1), 85-96. http://doi.org/c9qmkv
• Graber, D. A. (2001). Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://doi.org/dz7g
• Greatbatch, D. (1986). Aspects of Topical Organization in News Interviews: The Use of Agenda-Shifting Procedures by Interviewees. Media, Culture & Society, 8(4), 441–455. http://doi.org/b84h5h
• Greatbatch, D. (1988). A turn-taking system for British news interviews. Language in society, 17(3), 401-430. http://doi.org/brvmt9
• Hagerty, B. (2010). TV’s political host with the most. British Journalism Review, 21, 19-27. http://doi.org/dcbbnc
• Hallin, D. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/drqwt4
• Hallin, D.C. & Mancini, P. (Eds.) (2012). Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/ggk8kg
• Hamilton, M. A. & Mineo, P. J. (1998). A framework for understanding equivocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 3–35. http://doi.org/bcbgxj
• Heffelfinger, C. (2014). Cortesía y construcción de género en 10 entrevistas políticas de la televisión puertorriqueña. Diálogo de la Lengua, 6, 95-115. https://bit.ly/3fA8qdj
• Heritage, J. C.; Clayman, S. E. & Zimmerman, D. (1988). Discourse and message analysis: the micro-structure of mass media messages. In R. Hawkins; S. Pingree & J. Weinmann (Eds.), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes (pp. 77-109). Newbury Park: Sage.
• Heritage, J. (1985). Analysing news interview: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Academic Press.
• Heritage, J. & Greatbatch, D. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 93-137). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
• Higgins, M. (2010). The public inquisitor as media celebrity. Cultural Politics, 6, 93-110. http://doi.org/dghr39
• Hopmann, D.N.; Van Aelst, P. & Legnante, G., (2012). Political balance in the news: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 240-257. http://doi.org/cj34gk
• Huls, E. & Varwijk, J. (2011). Political bias in TV interviews. Discourse y Society, 22(1), 48-65. http://doi.org/cb2ztp
• Hutchby, I. (2006). Media Talk-Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
• Iyengar, S.; Peters, M. & Kinder, D. (1982). Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-So Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs. American Political Science Review, 76(4), 848–58. http://doi.org/dz7h
• Jucker, J. (1986). News Interviews: a Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: Gieben. http://doi.org/dz7j
• King, A. & Leigh, A. (2009). Beautiful Politicians. Kyklos, 62(4), 579–93. http://doi.org/bk4krc
• Kinnear, P.R. & Gray, C.D. (2001). SPSS for Windows Made Simple, Release 10. Hove: Psychology Press.
• Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(2), 363-374. http://doi.org/cgxczv
• Lawson, C.; Lenz, G.; Myers, M. & Baker, A. (2010). Candidate Appearance, Electability, and Political Institutions: Findings from Two Studies of Candidate Appearance. World Politics, 62(4), 561–93. http://doi.org/fn6sxf
• Lengauer, G.; Esser, F. & Berganza, R. (2012). Negativity in political news: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 179-202. http://doi.org/c2jp84
• Lenz, G. S. & Lawson, C. (2011). Looking the part: Television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates’ appearance. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 574-589. http://doi.org/dks2z7
• Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. http://doi.org/bnf755
• Liebes, T. (2001). Look me straight in the eye: the political discourse of authenticity, spontaneity and sincerity. The Communication Review, 4, 499-510. http://doi.org/cmx9j7
• Martín, M. (1999). El Lenguaje del cine. Barcelona: Gedisa.
• McCombs, M. E. & Mauro, J. B. (1988). Predicting newspaper readership from content characteristics’, Newspaper Research Journal, 10(1), 2530. http://doi.org/dz7k
• McNair, B., (2000). Journalism and democracy: a millennium audit. Journalism Studies 1, 197-211. http://doi.org/cqj89j
• McQuail, D. (1992). Media Performance. London: Sage.
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Selfand Society. Chicago: University Press.
• Mendelberg, T. (2001). Playing the Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. http://doi.org/dz7m
• Mickelson, S. (1976). The Candidate in the Living Room. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 427(1), 23–32. http://doi.org/bxc73z
• Mitry, J. (2002). Estética y psicología del cine. Barcelona, Siglo XXI.
• Montgomery, M. (2008). The discourse of the broadcast news interview: A typology. Journalism Studies, 9(2), 260-277. http://doi.org/czpdx4
• Morales, F. (2011). Diseño de un modelo de construcción informativa audiovisual eficiente: una propuesta para la generación de efectos de sentido. E-Compós, 14(1). http://doi.org/dz7n
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook. Sage. http://doi.org/dz7p
• Nimmo, D. D. & Combs, J. E. (1985). Nightly Horrors: Crisis Coverage by Television Network News. TN: University of Tennessee Press.
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media and Society, 6, 259-283. http://doi.org/dz4rp6
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a Response. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 152–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Black well Publishing.
• Sacks, H.; Schlegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 7-55). Elsevier. http://doi.org/dz7q
• Saperas, E. (2009). Los efectos cognitivos de la comunicación de masas: las recientes investigaciones en torno a los efectos de la comunicación de masas: 1970-1986. Barcelona: Ariel.
• Scannell, P. (1996). Radio Television and Modern Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Schudson, M. (1994). Question Authority: A History of the News Interview in American Periodism, 1860 – 1930. Media, Culture y Society, 16, 565–87. http://doi.org/dz7r
• Strömbäck, J. & Shehata, A., (2007). Structural biases in British and Swedish election news coverage. Journalism Studies, 8, 800-810. http://doi.org/djkqfj
• Stryker, R.; Conway, B.A. & Danielson, T. (2016). What is political incivility? Communication Monograph, 83, 535-556. http://doi.org/dz7s
• Tabachnick, B. G.; Fidell, L. S. & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Taboada, M. & Mann, W. (2005). Rhetorical structure theory: looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies, 8(3), 423-459. http://doi.org/cs325m
• Tannen, D. (1998). The Argument Culture: Changing the Way we Argue. New York: Virago Press.
• Tolson, A. (2006). Media Talk-Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Waver, D.H. & Wilnatt, L. (Eds.) (2012). The global journalist in the 21th century. London: Routledge. http://doi.org/f3rrgj