New evidence on accelerator performance based on funding and location

  1. Lydia Canovas-Saiz 1
  2. Isidre March-Chorda 1
  3. Rosa Maria Yague-Perales 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revista:
European journal of management and business economics

ISSN: 2444-8494,  2444-8451

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 29

Número: 3

Páginas: 217-234

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1108/EJMBE-10-2017-0029 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: European journal of management and business economics

Resumen

Purpose – Seed accelerators (SAs) appear as a more advanced version of business incubators. These for-profit organizations in exchange of equity, help setting new start-ups by providing mentoring and funding during its first months. Due to their emergent nature, the impact and expectations of SAs remains largely unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to throw new light on this field by empirically assessing for the first time the performance and prospects of these organizations through a survey of 116 SAs. Design/methodology/approach – A model based on the Business Incubators literature is built with four categories covering size, location, age and profitability variables, leading to two hypotheses to be tested empirically over a survey of 116 SAs. Findings – Some remarkable findings arise after implementation of both bivariate and multivariate analysis. The results confirm a higher size and performance in the US and in the oldest SAs at statistically significant levels. Research limitations/implications – The study is not free from limitations but the findings make a contribution to the still scarce existing literature on SAs, and provide some managerial implications to their stockholders, to investors and to entrepreneurs. Practical implications – The findings concerning performance indicators are especially helpful for investors, primarily concerned with the percentage return on investment factor, the period and the investment rounds needed to achieve exit. Another key issue is the SA’s role as an employment seedbed. At first glance, the amount of employment, both overall and per company, might seem small given the young age of these firms. The impact of SAs on the generation of new employment is difficult to measure as it usually takes place in further stages of development of the tenant companies, the so-called scale-up process. Nonetheless, at present, the number of new companies being born is remarkable and, in terms of employment, the results are indeed promising. Our findings also offer important implications for entrepreneurs, venture investors and policy-makers. To entrepreneurs, our findings offer insight on the expectations to hold in the accelerator programs. Social implications – For policy-makers and would-be accelerator founders, our results support the idea shared in the literature that accelerators can be an effective entrepreneurial intervention, even in small entrepreneurial ecosystems, compared to the strongest entrepreneurial hubs (Hallen et al., 2017). Originality/value – SAs are a very recent phenomenon which is blooming all over the world, especially in developed countries. SAs are therefore considered a key agent in the prospects of any entrepreneurial ecosystem. However, no studies have so far analysed the impact and performance of this emerging instrument. This is precisely the main purpose of this paper, to offer for the first time an approximate and exploratory assessment on the impact and prospects of SAs, based on a database.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abetti, P.A. (2004), “Government-supported incubators in the Helsinki region, Finland: infrastructure, results, and best practices”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 19-40.
  • Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P. and Vandenbempt, K. (2007), “Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators”, Technovation, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 254-267.
  • Akçomak, I.S. (2009), “Incubators as tools for entrepreneurship promotion in developing countries”, Research paper/UNU-WIDER 2009.52.
  • Aldrich, E.H. and Yang, T. (2012), “What did Stinchcombe really mean? Designing research to test the liability of newness among new ventures”, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 2157-5665.
  • Bergek, A. and Norman, C. (2008), “Incubator best practice: a framework”, Technovation, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 20-28.
  • Bertoni, F., Colombo, M.G. and Grilli, L. (2011), “Venture capital financing and the growth of high-tech start-ups: disentangling treatment from selection effects”, Research Policy, Vol. 40, pp. 1028-1043.
  • Bliemel, M.J., Flores, R.G., de Klerk, S., Miles, M.P., Costa, B. and Monteiro, P. (2016), “The role and performance of accelerators in the Australian startup ecosystem”, UNSW Business School Research Paper Series, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science.
  • Bottazzi, L. and Da Rin, M. (2002), “Venture capital in Europe and the financing of innovative companies”, Economic Policy, Vol. 17 No. 34, pp. 229-270.
  • Chen, C.J. (2009), “Technology commercialization, incubator and venture capital, and new venture performance”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 93-103.
  • Christiansen, J.D. (2009), “Copying Y combinator: a framework for developing seed accelerator programs”, MBA Dissertation at Judge Business School and Jesus College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E. and Vohora, A. (2005), “Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 183-216.
  • Cohen, S.G. (2013), “What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels”, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, Vol. 8 Nos 3-4, pp. 19-25.
  • Cohen, S.G. and Hochberg, Y.V. (2014), “Accelerating startups: the seed accelerator phenomenon”, SSRN 2418000, pp. 1-16, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract52418000 (accessed 13 June 2018).
  • Cohen, S.L., Bingham, C.B. and Hallen, B.L. (2018), “The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 0001839218782131, available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0001839218782131 (accessed 4 October 2018).
  • Cohen, S., Fehder, D.C., Hochberg, Y.V. and Murray, F. (2019), “The design of startup accelerators”, Research Policy, Vol. 48 No. 7, pp. 1781-1797.
  • Colombo, M.G. and Delmastro, M. (2002), “How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy”, Research Policy, Vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 1103-1122.
  • Colombo, M.G., Grilli, L. and Piva, E. (2006), “In search for complementary assets: the determinants of alliance formation of high-tech startups”, Research Policy, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 1166-1199.
  • Colombo, M.G. and Grilli, L. (2010), “On growth drivers of high-tech startups: the role of founders’ human capital and venture capital”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 25, pp. 610-626.
  • CrunchBase website (2018), available at: http://www.crunchbase.com (accessed 13 June 2018). CSES (2002), Benchmarking of Business Incubators. Sevenoaks: Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services, European Commission.
  • Davila, A., Foster, G. and Gupta, M. (2003), “Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18, pp. 689-708.
  • Dempwolf, C., Auer, J. and D’Ippolito, M. (2014), “Innovation accelerators: defining characteristics among startup assistance organizations”, Small Business Administration Government, available at: https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/rs425-Innovation-Accelerators-Report-FINAL.pdf (accessed 13 June 2018).
  • Denis, D.J. (2004), “Entrepreneurial finance: an overview of the issues and evidence”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 10, pp. 301-326.
  • Etzkowitz, H., de Mello, J.M.C. and Almeida, M. (2005), “Towards ‘meta-innovation’ in Brazil: the evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix”, Research Policy, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 411-424.
  • Fehder, D. and Hochberg, Y. (2019), Spillover Effects of Startup Accelerator Programs: Evidence from Venture-Backed Startup Activity, University of Southern California, Working Paper, available at: http://yael-hochberg.com/assets/portfolio/FH.pdf (accessed 4 October 2019).
  • Gompers, P.A. and Lerner, J. (2001), “The venture capital revolution”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, pp. 145-168.
  • Gonzalez-Uribe, J. and Leatherbee, M. (2017), “The effects of business accelerators on venture performance: evidence from Start-up Chile”, The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 1566-1603.
  • Hallen, B.L., Cohen, S. and Bingham, C. (2017), “Do accelerators work? If so, how? The impact of intensive learning from others on new venture development”, Working paper, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2719810.
  • Hallen, B.L., Cohen, S. and Bingham, C. (2019), “Do accelerators accelerate? If so, how? The impact of intensive learning from others on new venture development”, Organization Science Forthcoming, SSRN, available at: https://papers.
  • Hochberg, Y.V. (2016), “Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: the seed accelerator model”, Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 25-51.
  • Hsu, D.H. (2006), “Venture capitalists and cooperative startup commercialization strategy”, Management Science, Vol. 52, pp. 204-219.
  • Kim, J.H. and Wagman, L. (2014), “Portfolio size and information disclosure: an analysis of startup accelerators”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 29, pp. 520-534.
  • Löfsten, H. and Lindel€of, P. (2002), “Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms— academic-industry links, innovation and markets”, Research Policy, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 859-876.
  • Mian, S.A. (1997), “Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: an integrative framework”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12, pp. 251-285.
  • Mubaraki, A.H. and Busler, M. (2010), “Business incubators findings from a worldwide survey, and guidance for the GCC states”, Global Business Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 1-20.
  • Ozdemir, Ö.Ç. and S € ¸ ehitoglu, Y. (2013),  “Assessing the impacts of technology business incubators: a framework for technology development centers in Turkey”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 75, pp. 282-291.
  • Page, W. and Garbuio, M. (2016), “Corporate accelerators: a new approach to building entrepreneurial communities”, SMS Special Conference, pp. 1-2.
  • Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M. and Van Hove, J. (2016), “Understanding a new generation incubation model: the accelerator”, Technovation, Vols 50-51, pp. 13-24.
  • Pena, I. (2004), ~ “Business incubation centers and new firm growth in the Basque country”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 22 Nos 3-4, pp. 223-236.
  • Phan, P.H., Siegel, D.S. and Wright, M. (2005), “Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 165-182.
  • Puri, M. and Zarutskie, R. (2008), “On the lifecycle dynamics of venture-capital- and non-venturecapital-financed firms”, CES Working Paper No. 8-13.
  • Radojevich-Kelley, N. and Hoffman, D.L. (2012), “Analysis of accelerator companies: an exploratory case study of their programs, processes, and early results”, Small Business Institute Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 54-70.
  • Ratinho, T. and Henriques, E. (2010), “The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: evidence from Portugal”, Technovation, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 278-290.
  • Rothschild, L. and Darr, A. (2005), “Technological incubators and the social construction of innovation networks: an Israeli case study”, Technovation, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 59-67.
  • Salido, E., Sabas, M. and Freixas, P. (2014), The Accelerator and Incubator Ecosystem in Europe, Telefonica report, Madrid.
  • Schwartz, M. and G€othner, M. (2009), “A multidimensional evaluation of the effectiveness of business incubators: an application of the PROMETHEE outranking method”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 1072-1087.
  • Schwartz, M. and Hornych, C. (2008), “Specialization as strategy for business incubators: an assessment of the Central German Multimedia Center”, Technovation, Vol. 28 No. 7, pp. 436-449.
  • Schwartz, M. and Hornych, C. (2010), “Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: empirical evidence from Germany”, Technovation, Vol. 30 No. 9, pp. 485-495.
  • Schwartz, M. (2013), “A control group study of incubators’ impact to promote firm survival”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 302-331.
  • Shah, S.K. and Pahnke, E.C. (2014), “Parting the ivory curtain: understanding how universities support a diverse set of startups”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 780-792.
  • Smith, S.W., Hannigan, T.J. and Gasiorowski, L. (2013), “Accelerators and crowd-funding: complementarity, competition, or convergence in the earliest stages of financing new ventures? University of Colorado-Kauffman foundation crowd funding conference, Boulder, CO, July 12-13, 2013”, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id52298875 (accessed 13 June 2018).
  • Smith, S.W. and Hannigan, T.J. (2015), “Swinging for the fences: how do top accelerators impact the trajectories of new ventures?”, Paper Presented at DRUID15, Rome, June 15-17 2015.
  • Soetanto, P.D. and Jack, L.S. (2013), “Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 432-453.
  • Stayton, J. and Mangematin, V. (2019), “Seed accelerators and the speed of new venture creation”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 1163-1187.
  • Yin, R. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Yu, S. (2019), “How do accelerators impact the performance of high-technology ventures?”, Management Science, in press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet