La relación con los demás y la motivación en un Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos

  1. Ana María Botella Nicolás
  2. Pablo Ramos Ramos
Revista:
Estudios pedagógicos

ISSN: 0716-050X,  0718-0705

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 46

Número: 1

Páginas: 145-160

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4067/S0718-07052020000100145 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Estudios pedagógicos

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

RESUMEN: La relación entre pares es esencial en el desarrollo de metodologías activas como el Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos (ABP). Su importancia no solo reside en la creación de un contexto eficiente de trabajo, sino en el fomento de la motivación del alumno. Para entender cómo funciona esta última, la teoría de la autodeterminación ofrece un modelo en el que el desarrollo de la motivación intrínseca se asocia al fomento de tres necesidades psicológicas básicas: autonomía, competencia y relación con los demás. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar cómo funcionó la relación con los demás durante un ABP de naturaleza artística en dos grupos de educación secundaria. Los resultados muestran que la relación con los compañeros fue uno de los elementos más motivadores del mismo y que esta necesidad psicológica se vio favorecida por el desarrollo de las otras dos, autonomía y competencia.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Beaman, R.. (2007). Recent research on troublesome classroom behavior: a review. Australasian Journal of Special Education. 31. 45-60
  • Bardin, L.. (2001). L’analyse de contenu. Presses Universitaires de France. Paris.
  • Brown, B. B.. (2009). Handbook of adolescent psychology. Wiley. Nueva York.
  • Cox, A.. (2009). Peers and teachers as sources of relatedness perceptions, motivation, and affective responses in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 80. 765
  • Chirkov, V. I.. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and US adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 32. 618
  • Deci, E. L.. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality. 62. 119
  • Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum. Nueva York, NY.
  • Deci, E. L.. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 11. 227
  • Deci, E. L.. (2014). Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research, and applications. Springer. Dordrecht.
  • Elo, S.. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 62. 107
  • Epstein, J.. (1983). Friends in school. Academic Press. Nueva York.
  • Fernández-Balboa, J. M.. (1991). Beliefs, interactive thoughts, and actions of physical education students’ teachers regarding pupil misbehaviors. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 11. 59-78
  • Furrer, C.. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology. 95. 148
  • Furrer, C. J.. (2014). National Society for the Study of Education yearbook: Engaging youth in schools: Evidence-based models to guide future innovations. Teachers College Record. New York, NY.
  • Goodenow, C.. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students. Journal of Early Adolescence. 13. 21-43
  • Hamm, J. V.. (2005). Peer context of mathematics classroom belonging in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 25. 345
  • Hardré, P. L.. (2006). Factors affecting high school students’ academic motivation in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 26. 189-207
  • Helle, L.. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education - theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education. 51. 287-314
  • Hodges, P.. (2006). Teachers' reports of student misbehavior in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 77. 32-40
  • Houghton, S.. (1988). Classroom behavior problems which secondary school teachers say they find most troublesome. British Educational Research Journal. 14. 297-312
  • Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.,Holubec, E. J.. (1994). The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, VA.
  • Kindermann, T. A.. (1996). Social Motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Kokotsaki, D.. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools. 19. 267
  • LaGuardia, J. G.. (2002). Academic motivation of adolescents. IAP. Greenwich CT.
  • Little, E.. (2005). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of students’ problem behaviors. Educational Psychology. 25. 369
  • Liu, W. C.. (2009). A self-determination approach to understanding students’ motivation in project work. Learning and Individual Differences. 19. 139
  • Mac-Iver, D. J.. (2002). Development of achievement motivation. Academic Press. San Diego, CA.
  • Martin, A. J.. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research. 79. 327
  • Mergendoller, J.. (2006). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Lawrence Erlbaum. Mahwah.
  • Mikami, A. Y.. (2017). Perceptions of relatedness with classroom peers promote adolescents’ behavioral engagement and achievement in secondary school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 46. 2341
  • Niemiec, Ch. N.. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education. 7. 133
  • Qin, Z.. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research. 65. 129
  • Reeve, J.. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist. 44. 159
  • Reeve, J.. (2016). Building Autonomous Learners. Springer. Singapore.
  • Ryan, R. M.. (2000). Self-determination Theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 55. 68-78
  • Ryan, R. M.. (1991). Autonomy and relatedness as fundamental to motivation and education. The Journal of Experimental Education. 60. 49-66
  • Ryan, R. M.. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 14. 226
  • Smetana, J.. (2011). Adolescents, families, and social development: How teens construct their worlds. Wiley. Oxford.
  • Stefanou, C. (2013). Self-regulation and autonomy in problem-and project-based learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education. 14. 109
  • Sun, R. C. F.. (2013). Classroom misbehavior in the eyes of students: A qualitative study. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development. 6. 113
  • Thomas, J. W.. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation. San Rafael, CA.
  • Vansteenkiste, M.. (2010). Advances in motivation and achievement, 16A: decade ahead. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Bradford.
  • Wentzel, K. R.. (1998). Academic and social motivational influences on students' academic performance. Educational Psychology Review. 10. 155
  • Williams, G. C.. (1999). The importance of self-determination theory for medical education. Academic Medicine. 74. 972979
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet