Intervención participativa y transformadora con madres en un centro escolar

  1. Donato, Donatella 1
  2. San Martín Alonso, Ángel 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revista:
Revista complutense de educación

ISSN: 1130-2496,  1988-2793

Any de publicació: 2020

Volum: 31

Número: 4

Pàgines: 507-516

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.5209/RCED.65808 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Revista complutense de educación

Resum

In a neighborhood in the city of Valencia, two groups of Romani and non-Romani women, together with teachers and families from the local public school, began a journey of knowledge and mutual transformation. The school management team positively responded to the request to participate in a socio-cultural innovation project to be undertaken in their area. In the El Cabanyal neighborhood, problems of co-existence between groups of different cultures were detected. The project was based on a pedagogy committed to the participatory and transformative research activity of the community rooted in narratives, reflections and transforming practice. During the project design and follow-up, an ethnographical methodology was applied to analyze the social reality, the regenerative relationship among social stakeholders and knowledge co-production as the basis of social action. This research model was linked with the context by contributing to identify and solve specific problems. To do so, resources like interviews, participative observation, field notebooks, photography, representation, etc., were employed. Of the results, the following stand out: linguistic and communicative intersubjectivity between stakeholders; preparing a narrative account with dialogue and co-participation experience in democratic life to promote education for citizenship both individually and collectively. Due to the nature of the applied methodology, we must continue to reconceptualize with new projects. The adopted strategies favor an emotional bond between people in a specific context, characterized by segregation and conflict. The objective was to create relationships, cultivate values of peaceful co-existence and recover the territory's own resources as a basis to develop critical consciousness and conceptualizing difference as a common good.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Anderson, G. L. (2017). Can participatory action research (PAR) democratize research, knowledge, and schooling? Experiences from the global South and North. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(5), 427-431.
  • Angulo, F. y Redón, S. (2012). Realismo ontológico: breves reflexiones sobre epistemología y educación. Revista Fermentario, 6, 1-20.
  • Augé, M. (2018). El porvenir de los terrícolas. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  • Bauman, Z. (2013). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Beck, U. (1992). From industrial society to the risk society: questions of survival, social structure and ecological enlightenment. Theory, culture & Society, 9(1), 97-123.
  • Beck, U. (1998). La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona : Paidós Ibérica.
  • Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. C., Melendres, J. y Subirats, M. (1981). La reproducción: elementos para una teoría del sistema de enseñanza. Barcelona: Laia.
  • Bradbury-Jones, C., y Taylor, J. (2015). Engaging with children as co-researchers: challenges, counter-challenges and solutions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(2), 161-173.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1987). La ecología del desarrollo humano. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Bruner, J. (1992). La ricerca del significato. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  • Caamaño, C. (2012). Valor epistemológico y transformador de la narrativa en la enseñanza. Revista Fermentario, 6, 1-12.
  • Calvino, I. (2012). Le città invisibili. Milano: Edizioni Mondadori.
  • Chevalier, J. M., y Buckles, D. J. (2019). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. London: Routledge.
  • Civis, M. y Longás, J. (2015). La colaboración interinstitucional como respuesta al desafío de la inclusión socioeducativa. Educación XXI, 18(1), 213-236.
  • Clandinin, D. J. y Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.
  • Connelly, F.M. y Clandinin, J., (1995). Relatos de experiencia e investigación narrativa. 11-59 En Larrosa, J. et al. (Comps). Déjame que te cuente. Ensayos sobre narrativa y educación. Barcelona: Laertes.
  • Del Gobbo, G. (2010). Un approccio pedagogico alla dimensione partecipativa per l'integrazione tra saperi materiali e immateriali. Studi Sulla Formazione, 13(2), 95.
  • Demetrio, D. (2017). La vita si cerca dentro di sé. Lessico autobiográfico. Milano: Mimesis.
  • Donato, D., y San Martín, Á. (2018). Comprender los Medios, Transformar la Ciudad: un Proyecto Participativo de Formación del Profesorado. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 32(1), 43-55.
  • Fals-Borda, O. (2001). Participatory (action) research in social theory: origins and challenges. En Reason, P. y Bradbury, H. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 27–37). London: Sage.
  • Freire, P. (1989). La educación como práctica de la libertad. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
  • Freire, P. (1997). Política y educación. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
  • Gibbons, M. (2000). Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science. Science and public policy, 27(3), 159-163.
  • Gonçalves, M. y García Del Dujo, (2016). Education and struggles for recognition: the strategic role of empowerment. Revista española de pedagogía, 74(264), 283-296.
  • Gruzinski, S. (2000). El pensamiento mestizo. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Habermas, J. (1998). The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Janoschka, M. (2016). Gentrificación, desplazamiento, desposesión: procesos urbanos claves en América Latina. Revista INVI, 31(88), 27-71.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1969). El derecho a la ciudad. Barcelona: Ed. Península.
  • Leiva, J.J. (2017). La escuela intercultural hoy: reflexiones y perspectivas pedagógicas. Revista Complutense de Educación, 28(1), 29-43.
  • Llevot Calvet, N., & Bernad Cavero, O. (2016). La mediación gitana: herramienta performativa de las relaciones entre escuela y familia. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria De Formación Del Profesorado, 19(1), 99-110.
  • Mertens, D. M. (2017). Transformative research: personal and societal. International Journal for Trasformative Research, 4(1), 18-24.
  • Milani, L. (1996). Lettera a una professoressa. Firenze: Libreria Editrice Fiorentina.
  • Mirra, N., Garcia, A., y Morrell, E. (2015). Doing youth participatory action research: Transforming inquiry with researchers, educators, and students. London: Routledge.
  • Mortari, L. (2017). La sapienza del cuore: pensare le emozioni, sentire i pensieri. Milano: Raffaello Cortina editore.
  • Passeron, J. C. y Revel, J. (2005). Penser par cas. Raissonner à partir de singularités. Penser par cas, En J.C Passeron y J. Revel (Eds.), Penser par cas, 4, Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, pp.9-44.
  • Sassen, S. (2016a). Global networks, linked cities. London: Routledge.
  • Sassen, S. (2016b). At the systemic edge: expulsions. European Review, 24(1), 89-104.
  • Stake, R.E. (2010). Investigación con estudio de caso. Madrid: Morata.
  • Young, I. M. (1994). Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 19(3), 713-738.
  • Young, I. M. (2011). Justice and Politics of Difference. New York: Princeton University Press.
  • Trilla, J. (1999). La Ciudad Educadora. De las Retóricas a los Proyectos. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 278, 44-50.
  • Van Manen, M. (2007). El tacto en la enseñanza. El significado de la sensibilidad pedagógica. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Willis, P. (2000). The ethnographic imagination. London: Polity Edition.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet