Relación audio-radiológica en pacientes con otosclerosis

  1. Anca Oprisan 1
  2. Nicolás Albertz 1
  3. Juan Delgado-Moraleda 1
  4. Luisa Londoño-Villa 1
  5. Manuel Mateos-Fernández 2
  6. Miguel Mazón 1
  7. Luis Martí-Bonmatí 3
  1. 1 Servicio de Radiología. Área Clínica de Imagen Médica. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
  2. 2 Servicio de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
  3. 3 Servicio de Radiología. Área Clínica de Imagen Médica. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe; Grupo de Investigación Biomédica en Imagen. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe
Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina

ISSN: 0034-0634

Argitalpen urtea: 2020

Zenbakia: 137

Orrialdeak: 60-64

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.32440/AR.2020.137.01.REV07 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

Objective: To evaluate the findings of otosclerosis in the temporal bone CT compared with the results of the pre and post-surgical audiometry analysis. Method: 44 patients were included, with a total of 53 ears. The diagnosis of otosclerosis was made by audiometry in conjunction with CT and surgery findings. The post-surgical evaluation was performed with audiometry. SPSS Statistics 23.0 was used for the data processing. The involvement of the fissula ante fenestram (group 1) was considerate fenestral affectation. The diffuse or patched cochlear involvement (group 2) was considerate coclear or retrofenestral involvement. Audiometry was recorded as the pure tonal average of the frequencies 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz, and the bone-air gap, was obtained before and after surgery. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 53 ears affected by otosclerosis, 16 ears (30%) had cochlear involvement and 37 (60%) fenestral involvement. The average diameter of the otosclerosis focus was 2.47 mm, with a standard deviation of 1.51 and the height of the oval window niche was 1.55 mm with a standard deviation of 0.35, without identifying statistically significant differences between the two groups. A significant relationship (Pearson's linear correlation, p <0.05) was identified between the diameter of the otosclerosis focus and the audiometric values measured in dB. Conclusion: The findings of our study show the usefulness of temporal bone CT in the evaluation of the extension of the otosclerosis focus, since a greater extension of the otosclerosis focus is associated with greater sensory hearing loss and with less hearing recovery after the surgical intervention.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Purohit B, R Op de Beeck K. Imaging in otosclerosis: A pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2014; 5(2): 245-252.
  • Batson L, Rizzolo D. Otosclerosis: An update on diagnosis and treatment. JAAPA 2017; 30(2): 17-22.
  • Yamashita K, Hiwatashi A, Togao O, et al. Additive value of “otosclerosis-weighted” images for the CT diagnosis of fenestral otosclerosis. Acta Radiol 2017; 58(10): 1215-1221.
  • Gredilla Molinero J, Mancheño Losa M, Santamaría Guinea N, et al. Update on the imaging diagnosis of otosclerosis. Radiología 2016; 58(4): 246-256.
  • Lee TC, Aviv RI, Chen JM, et al. CT Grading of otosclerosis. Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30(7): 1435-1439.
  • Marshall AH, Fanning N, Symons S, et al. Cochlear implantation in cochlear otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 2005; 115(10): 1728-1733.
  • Stott C, Arteaga P, Moyano L. What do we know about otosclerosis ?: Anatomo-pathological aspects. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello 2005; 65: 179-186.
  • Shin YJ, Fraysse B, Deguine O, et al. Sensorineural hearing loss and otosclerosis: a clinical and radiologic survey of 437 cases. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121(2): 200-204.
  • Casas JS, Rodriguez D, Miranda G, et al. Otosclerosis: Revisión de aspectos etiopatogénicos, clínico-demográficos e imagenológicos. Rev Chil Radiol 2016; 22(3): 108-113.
  • Dudau C, Salim F, Jiang D, et al. Diagnostic efficacy and therapeutic impact of computed tomography in the evaluation of clinically suspected otosclerosis. Eur Radiol 2017; 27(3): 1195-1201.
  • Min JY, Chung WH, Lee WY, et al. Otosclerosis: Incidence of positive findings on temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT) and audiometric correlation in Korean patients. Auris Nasus Larynx 2010; 37(1): 23-28.
  • Kiyomizu K, Tono T, Yang D, et al. Correlation of CT analysis and audiometry in Japanese otosclerosis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2004; 31(2): 125-129.
  • Hueb MM, Goycoolea MV, Paparella MM, et al. Otosclerosis: The University of Minnesota Temporal Bone Collection. Otolaryngol Neck Surg 1991; 105(3): 396-405.
  • Schuknecht HF, Barber W. Histologic variants in otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 198; 95(11): 1307-1317.
  • Marx M, Lagleyre S, Escudé B, et al. Correlations between CT scan findings and hearing thresholds in otosclerosis. Acta Otolaryngol 2011; 131(4): 351-357.
  • Khamassi K, Mahfoudhi M, Mbarek H, et al. Otosclerosis : Contribution of Computed Tomography and Radio-Anatomical Correlations. Open J Clin Diag 2015; 05(02): 74-80.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet