A lexical-constructional approach to light and sound emission verbs

Bibliographic References

• Boas, H. C. 2002. “On the role of semantic constraints in resultative constructions”. Ed. R. Rapp. Linguistics on the Way into the New Millennium. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 35-44.
• Boas, H. C. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: Stanford Monographs in Linguistics.
• Boas, H. C. 2005. “Determining the productivity of resultative constructions: A reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff”. Language 81 (2): 448-464.
• Broccias, C. 2003. “The English change network”. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Broccias, C. 2004. “The cognitive basis of adjectival and adverbial resultative constructions”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2: 103-126.
• Chierchia, G. 2004. “A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences.” The Unaccusative Puzzle. Explorations in the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. Eds. A. Alexiadou, E. Agnasnostopoulou and M. Everaert. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 22-59.
• Cortés Rodríguez, F. J. 2007. The English Constructicon. University of La Laguna. Unpublished manuscript.
• Cortés Rodríguez, F. J. 2009. “The inchoative construction. Semantic representation and unification constraints”. Deconstructing Constructions. Eds. C. S. Butler and J. Martín Arista, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 247-270.
• Cortés Rodríguez, F. J. and M. González Orta. 2006. “Anglo-Saxon verbs of sound: Semantic Architecture, lexical representation and constructions”. Studia Anglica Poznaniensia 42: 249-284.
• Faber, P. B. and R. Mairal Usón. 1999. Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Fodor, J. A. 1970. “Three reasons for not deriving kill from cause to die”. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 429-438.
• Givón, T. 1985. “Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax”. Iconicity in Syntax. Ed. J. Haiman. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at Work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Goldberg, A. and R. Jackendoff. 2004. “The English resultative as a family of constructions”. Language 80 (3): 532-568.
• Gonzálvez-García, F. and C. Butler. 2006. “Mapping functional-cognitive space”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4: 39-96.
• Haiman, J. 1980. “Dictionaries and Encyclopedias”. Lingua 50: 329-357.
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. “Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part I”. Journal of Linguistics 3 (1): 37-81.
• Hoekstra, T. 1988. “Small clause results”. Lingua 74: 101-137.
• Iwata, S. 2006. “Argument resultatives and adjunct resultatives in a lexical constructional account: The case of resultatives with adjectival result phrases”. Language Sciences 28: 449-496.
• Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Reason and Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Katz, J. J. 1970. “Interpretative semantics vs. Generative semantics”. Foundations of Language 6: 220-259.
• Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, G. 1989. “Some empirical results about the nature of concepts”. Mind & Language 4 (1-2): 103-129.
• Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Langacker, R. 2005. “Construction Grammars: Cognitive, radical and less so”. Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction. Eds. F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and M. S. Peña Cervel. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 101-159.
• Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Levin, B. and M. Rappaport-Hovav. 1994. “A preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English”. Acquisition of the Lexicon. Eds. L. R. Gleitman and B. Landau. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 35-77.
• Levin, B. and M. Rappaport-Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity at the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Peña Cervel, M. S. and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez. 2009. “The metonymic grounding of two image schema transformations”. Eds. K.-U. Panther, L. Thornburg and A. Barcelona. Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 339-361.
• Perek, F. and M. Lemmens. “Getting at the meaning of the English at-construction: the case of a constructional split”. CogniTextes [En ligne], Volume 5/2010, mis en ligne le 20 décembre 2010, Consulté le 23 février 2011. [Internet document available at http://cognitextes.revues.org/331].
• Piñón, C. 2001. “A finer look at the causative-inchoative alternation.” Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 11. Eds. R. Hastings, B. Jackson and Z. Zvolenszky. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University. [Internet document available at http://pinon.sdf-eu.org/papers/ pinon_flcia.pdf].
• Rothmayr, A. 2009. The Structure of Stative Verbs. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and A. Luzondo Oyón. 2011. “Lexical-constructional subsumption in resultative constructions in English”. Eds. M. Brdar, M. Z. Fuchs, I. Raffaelli, M.-M. Stanojevic, N. T. Vukovic. Cognitive Linguistics. Between Universality and Variation. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. In preparation.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and F. Gonzálvez García. 2011. “Constructional integration in the Lexical-Constructional Model”. BAS (British and American Studies) XVII: 75-95.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and L. Pérez Hernández. 2001. “Metonymy and the grammar: motivations, constraints and interaction”. Language and Communication 21: 321-357.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and R. Mairal. 2007. “High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction”. Eds. G. Radden, K-M. Köpcke, T. Berg and P. Siemund. Aspects of Meaning Construction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 33-51.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and R. Mairal Usón. 2008. “Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model”. Folia Lingüística 42 (2): 355-400.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and R. Mairal Usón. 2011. “Constraints on syntactic alternation: Lexical-constructional subsumption in the Lexical-Constructional Model”. Ed. P. Guerrero, Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. Equinox.
• Schönelfeld, D. 2006. “Constructions”. Special Volume 1: Constructions All Over: Case Studies and Theoretical Implications. SV1-1.
• Talmy, L. 1991. “Path to realization: A typology of event conflation”. Berkeley Working Papers in Linguistics. 480-519.
• Talmy, L. 1996. “The windowing of attention in language”. Eds. M. Shibatani and S. Thompson, Grammatical Constructions. Oxford University Press. 245-287.
• Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Concept Structuring Systems. Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.