The green battle in the mediaA framing analysis of environmental press coverage

  1. Mateu, Anna 1
  2. Domínguez, Martí 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revista:
Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

ISSN: 2386-7876

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 32

Número: 4

Páginas: 275-290

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15581/003.32.4.275-290 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

Resumen

The analysis of environmental media coverage using framing theory allows us to study and compare its evolution over time and establish a typology to discuss how the media echoes environmental issues and controversies. In this article, we propose a framing typology for environmental discourses, based on previous typologies and expanded with the different interpretive frames we have identified in environment-related opinion texts published in two historical periods: the 1980s and the year 2018. This frame typology can be used in the analysis of reporting about environmental movements and conflicts, and to other practical cases of environmental hot topics like climate change. The analysis of the environmental discourse in the press can be very useful to establish the evolution of this type of discourse in our society and the predominant concept of nature at a particular time.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, A. G. (2014). Media, environment and the network society. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2015). Framing theory in communication research. Origins, development and current situation in Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, 423-450. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1053en
  • Blanco Castilla, E., Quesada, M. & Teruel Rodríguez, L. (2013). From Kyoto to Durban. Mass media editorial position about climate change. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 68, 420-435. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2013-983en
  • Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61, 246–263. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
  • Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A. & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it… and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 7-23. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
  • Carragee, K. M. & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214-233. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
  • Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Rereading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 223–243. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066775
  • Carvalho, A. (2008). Media(ted) discourse and society. Journalism Studies, 9(2), 161–177. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848162
  • Castelló, E. (2010). Framing news on risk industries: Local journalism and Conditioning factors. Journalism, 11(4), 463-480. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884910367592
  • Cheng, L., Igartua, J. J., Palacios, E., Acosta, T. & Palito, S. (2010). Framing immigration news in Spanish regional press. International Migration, 56, 197-215. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00647.x
  • D’Angelo, P. & Kuypers, J. A. (2010). Introduction: Doing news framing analysis. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis. Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-13). New York: Routledge.
  • Day, A. G. & Golan, G. (2005). Source and content diversity in op-ed pages: Assessing editorial strategies in The New York Times and The Washington Post. Journalism Studies, 6(1), 61- 71. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670052000328212
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  • Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405
  • Hansen, A. (2011). Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. International Communication Gazette, 73(1-2), 7-25. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386739
  • Lopera, E. & Moreno, C. (2014). The uncertainties of climate change in Spanish daily newspapers: Content analysis of press coverage from 2000 to 2010. Journal of Science Communication, 13(1). https://www.doi.org/10.22323/2.13010202
  • López Rabadán, P. (2010). Nuevas vías para el estudio del framing periodístico. La noción de estrategia de encuadre. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 16, 235-258. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ESMP/article/view/ESMP1010110235A
  • Maibach, E., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K. & Diao, G. (2010). Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 299. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-299
  • Mateu, A. & Domínguez, M. (2011). Inicios del columnismo ambiental en la prensa española: La campaña de Las Provincias sobre la urbanización de El Saler (Valencia, España). Zer Revista de Estudios de Comunicación 30, 171-187. Retrieved from https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/Zer/article/view/4801
  • Mateu, A. & Domínguez, M. (2017). Unravelling environment and politics in the Spanish press: From Franco’s dictatorship to democracy. Communication & Society, 30(2), 61-76. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.30.2.61-77
  • Meadows, M. & Thomson, R. (2014). Campaigning journalism: The early press, environmental advocacy and national parks. In L. Lester & B. Hutchins (Eds.), Environmental conflict and the media (pp. 37-48). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Metag, J., Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T., Barsuhn, T. & Kleinen-Von Königslöw, K. (2016). Perceptions on climate change imagery: Evoked salience and self-efficacy in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Science Communication, 38(2), 197-227. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1075547016635181
  • Mitman, T., Nikolaev, A. & Porpora, D. (2012). The critical moral voice on American newspaper opinion pages. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5(3), 392-408. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2012.01128.x
  • Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment, 51(2), 12-23.
  • Nisbet, M. C. (2010). Knowledge into action: Framing debates over climate change and poverty. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis. Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 43-83). Nova York: Routledge.
  • O’Neil, S., Williams, H. T. P., Kurz, T., Wiersma, B. & Boykoff, M. (2015). Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Nature Climate Change, 5, 380-385. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2535
  • Olausson, U. (2011). “We’re the ones to blame”: Citizens’ representations of climate change and the role of the media. Environmental Communication, 5(3), 281–299. https://www.doi.org/ 10.1080/17524032.2011.585026
  • Olausson, U. & Berglez, P. (2014). Media and climate change: Four long-standing research challenges revisited. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 249–265. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.906483
  • Pan, Y., Opgenhaffe, M. & Van Gorp, B. (2019). Negotiating climate change: A frame analysis of COP21 in British, American, and Chinese news media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(5), 519-533. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0963662518823969
  • Ross, A. D. & Rivers, D. J. (2019). Internet memes, media frames, and the conflicting logics of climate change discourse. Environmental Communication (published online). https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1560347
  • Schäfer, M. S. & O’Neil, S. (2017). Frame analysis in climate change communication. In S. Ho, E. Markowitz, S. O’Neil, M. Nisbet, J. Thaker & M. S. Schäfer (Eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science (online publication). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.487
  • Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
  • Scheufele, D. A. & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
  • Taylor, D. E. (2000). The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: Injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 508-580. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764200043004003
  • Valera Ordaz, L. (2016). El sesgo mediocéntrico del framing en España: Una revision crítica de la aplicación de la teoría del encuadre en los estudios de comunicación. Zer Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 21(41), 13-31. https://www.doi.org/10.1387/zer.16404
  • Valera Ordaz, L. & López García, G. (2014). Agenda and frames in the websites of the People’s Party (PP) and the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) in the 2011 cyber campaing. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 69, 41-66. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1000en
  • Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60-78. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x
  • Vicente-Mariño, M. (2010). Agendas, encuadres y discursos en los noticiarios televisivos españoles durante la crisis del Prestige. Athenea Digital, 19, 249-257. Retrieved from http://psicologiasocial.uab.es/athenea/index.php/atheneaDigital/article/view/785
  • Vicente Mariño, M. & López Rabadán, P. (2009). Resultados actuales de la investigación sobre framing: sólido avance internacional y arranque de la especialidad en España. Zer Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 14(26), 13-34. Retrieved from https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/Zer/article/view/2750
  • Vliegenthart, R. & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101-115. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0637323111404838
  • Young, N. (2013). Working the fringes: The roles of letters to the editor in advancing nonstandard media narratives about climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 22(4), 443–459. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0963662511414983