The cluster is not flatUneven impacts of brokerage roles on the innovative performance of firms

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ács, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., Innovation and technological change: an overview. Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., (eds.) Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, 1991, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
• Adler, P.S., Kwon, S.-W., Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27:1 (2002), 17–40.
• Albors, J.G., Networking and technology transfer in the Spanish ceramic tiles cluster: its role in the sector competitiveness. J. Technol. Transfer 27:3 (2002), 263–273.
• Aldrich, H., Zimmer, C., Entrepreneurship through social networks. Sexton, D., Smilor, R., (eds.) The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, 1986, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
• Arikan, A., Schilling, M.A., Structure and governance in industrial districts: implications for competitive advantage. J. Manag. Stud. 48:4 (2011), 772–803.
• Arora, A., Gambardella, A., Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 24:1 (1994), 91–114.
• Barney, J.B., Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17 (1991), 99–120.
• Barrodale, I., Roberts, F.D.K., Solution of an overdetermined system of equations in the l 1 norm [F4]. CACM 17:6 (1974), 319–320.
• Bathelt, H., Gräf, A., Internal and external dynamics of the Munich film and TV industry cluster, and limitations to future growth. Environ. Plan. A 40:8 (2008), 1944–1965.
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., Maskell, P., Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 28 (2004), 31–56.
• Becattini, G., The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. Pyke, F., Becattini, G., Sengenberger, W., (eds.) Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-Operation in Italy, 1990, International Institute for Labor Studies, Ginebra.
• Becker, M.H., Sociometric location and innovativeness: reformulation and extension of the diffusion model. Am. Sociol. Rev. 35:2 (1970), 267–282.
• Belso-Martínez, J.A., Molina-Morales, F.X., Martínez-Cháfer, L., Contributions of brokerage roles to firms’ innovation in a confectionery cluster. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 27:9 (2015), 1014–1030.
• Berman, S.L., Down, J., Hill, C.W., Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad. Manag. J. 45:1 (2002), 13–31.
• Boari, C., Molina-Morales, F.X., Martínez-Cháfer, L., Direct and interactive effects of brokerage roles on innovation in clustered firms. Growth Change, 2016, 10.1111/grow.12170.
• Boari, C., Odorici, V., Zamarian, M., Clusters and rivalry: does localization really matter?. Scand. J. Manag. 19:4 (2003), 467–489.
• Boari, C., Riboldazzi, F., Innovare nei cluster geografici: Origine e sviluppo di un knowledge broker. Boari, C., (eds.) Dinemiche evolutive nei cluster geografici di emprese, 2010, Il Molino, Bologna.
• Boari, C., Riboldazzi, F., How knowledge brokers emerge and evolve: the role of actors’ behaviour. Res. Policy 43:4 (2014), 683–695.
• Boix, R., Galletto, V., El nuevo mapa de los distritos industriales de España y su comparación con Italia y el Reino Unido, Documento de trabajo 06.04. 2006, Departament d'Economia Aplicada. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
• Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M., Freeman, L., Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. 2002, Analytic Technologies, Harvard.
• Borgatti, S.P., Foster, P.C., The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. J. Manag. 29:6 (2003), 991–1013.
• Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D.J., Labianca, G., Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323:5916 (2009), 892–895.
• Boschma, R.A., Ter Wal, A.L.J., Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district. Ind. Innov. 14:2 (2007), 177–199.
• Branston, J.R., Rubini, L., Sugden, R., Wilson, J.R., Healthy governance: economic policy and the Health Industry Model. Di Tommaso, M.R., Schweitzer, S.O., (eds.) Promoting High-Tech Industries, 2005, Can Growth Lead the Way, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
• Burt, R.S., Brokerage and Closure. 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Chesbrough, H.W., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. 2003, MA, Cambridge.
• Coad, A., Rao, R., Innovation and market value: a quantile regression analysis. Econ. Bull., 15(13), 2006.
• Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ. J. 99:397 (1989), 569–596.
• Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35:1 (1990), 128–152.
• Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Fortune favors the prepared firm. Manag. Sci. 40:2 (1994), 227–251.
• Coleman, J.S., Foundation of Social Theory. 1990, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Cumbers, A., Mackinnon, D., Chapman, K., Innovation, collaboration, and learning in regional clusters: a study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex. Environ. Plan. A 35:9 (2003), 1689–1706.
• Dei Ottati, G., The industrial district. Transaction problems and the ‘community market’. Camb. J. Econ. 18:2 (1994), 529–546.
• Dyer, J., Nobeoka, K., Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strateg. Manag. J. 21:Special Issue 3 (2000), 345–367.
• Ebersberger, B., Herstad, S.J., Product innovation and the complementarities of external interfaces. Eur. Manag. Rev. 8:3 (2011), 117–135.
• Ebersberger, B., Marsili, O., Reichstein, T., Salter, A., Into thin air: using a quantile regression approach to explore the relationship between R&D and innovation. Int. Rev. Appl. Econ. 24:1 (2010), 95–102.
• Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., Tribó, J.A., Managing external knowledge flows: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Res. Policy 38:1 (2009), 96–105.
• Expósito-Langa, M., Molina-Morales, F.X., Tomás-Miquel, J.-V., How shared vision moderates the effects of absorptive capacity and networking on clustered firms’ innovation. Scand. J. Manag. 31:3 (2015), 293–302.
• Flor, M.L., Oltra, M.J., Identification of innovating firms through technological innovation indicators: an application to the Spanish ceramic tile industry. Res. Policy 33:2 (2004), 323–336.
• Galunic, C., Rodan, S., Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strateg. Manag. J. 19:12 (1998), 1193–1201.
• Giner, J.M., Santa María, M.J., Territorial systems of small firms in Spain: an analysis of productive and organizational characteristics in industrial districts. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 14 (2002), 211–228.
• Giuliani, E., The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: evidence from the wine industry. J. Econ. Geogr. 7 (2007), 139–168.
• Giuliani, E., Bell, M., The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Res. Policy 34 (2005), 47–68.
• Gould, R.V., Fernandez, R.M., Structures of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol. Methodol. 19 (1989), 89–126.
• Graf, H., Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators. Camb. J. Econ., 35(1), 2011, 173.
• Graf, H., Kruger, J.J., The performance of gatekeepers in innovator networks. Ind. Innov. 18:1 (2011), 69–88.
• Grant, R.M., The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 33:3 (1991), 114–135.
• Grimpe, C., Kaiser, U., Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: the gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. J. Manag. Stud. 47:8 (2010), 1483–1509.
• Hanneman, R.A., Riddle, M., Social Network Analysis. 2001, University of California, Riverside.
• Henry, N., Pinch, S., Neo-Marshallian nodes, institutional thickness, and Britain's ‘motor sport valley’: thick or thin?. Environ. Plan. A 33:7 (2001), 1169–1183.
• Hervas-Oliver, J.L., Heterogeneidad Estratégica en un Cluster. Evidencia Empírica de la Identificación de Grupos Estratégicos a través de la cadena de valor y su impacto en la performance en el sector industrial cerámico. 2004, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia.
• Koenker, R., Bassett, G. Jr., Regression quantiles. Econom. J. Econom. Soc., 1978, 33–50.
• Koenker, R., Hallock, K., Quantile regression: an introduction. J. Econ. Perspect. 15:4 (2001), 43–56.
• Koenker, R.W., d'Orey, V., Algorithm AS 229: computing regression quantiles. Appl. Stat., 1987, 383–393.
• Lam, A., Tacit Knowledge Organisational Learning and Innovation: A Societal Perspective. 1998, DRUID.
• Lane, P.J., Lubatkin, M., Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strateg. Manag. J. 19 (1998), 461–477.
• Lane, P.J., Salk, J.E., Lyles, M.A., Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strateg. Manag. J. 22:12 (2001), 1139–1161.
• Laursen, K., Salter, A., Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 27:2 (2006), 131–150.
• Leonard-Barton, D., Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg. Manag. J. 13:S1 (1992), 111–125.
• Lorenzoni, G., Lipparini, A., The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strateg. Manag. J. 20:4 (1999), 317–338.
• Marsden, P.V., Brokerage behavior in restricted exchange networks. Marsden, P.V., Nan, L., (eds.) Social Structure and Network Analysis, 1982, Sage, Beverly Hills.
• Maskell, P., Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Ind. Corp. Change 10:4 (2001), 921–943.
• McEvily, B., Zaheer, A., Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 20:12 (1999), 1133–1156.
• McFadyen, M.A., Cannella, A.A., Social capital and knowledge creation: diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Acad. Manag. J. 47:5 (2004), 735–746.
• Mesquita, L.F., Lazzarini, S.G., Horizontal and vertical relationships in developing economies: implications for SMEs’ access to global markets. Acad. Manag. J. 51:2 (2008), 359–380.
• Molina-Morales, F.X., Industrial districts and innovation: the case of the Spanish ceramic tiles industry. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 14:4 (2002), 317–335.
• Molina-Morales, F.X., The territorial agglomerations of firms: a social capital perspective from the Spanish tile industry. Growth Change 36:1 (2005), 74–99.
• Molina-Morales, F.X., Belso-Martinez, J.A., Mas-Verdú, F., Interactive effects of internal brokerage activities in clusters: the case of the Spanish Toy Valley. J. Bus. Res. 69:5 (2016), 1785–1790.
• Molina-Morales, F.X., Expósito-Langa, M., The impact of cluster connectedness on firm innovation: R&D effort and outcomes in the textile industry. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 24:7–8 (2012), 685–704.
• Molina-Morales, F.X., Martínez-Fernández, M.T., Factors that identify industrial districts: an application in Spanish manufacturing firms. Environ. Plan. A 36:1 (2004), 111–126.
• Molina-Morales, F.X., Martínez-Fernández, M.T., Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: how an excess of intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strateg. Manag. J., 30(1013), 2009, 1023.
• Morrison, A., Gatekeepers of knowledge’ within industrial districts: who they are, how they interact. Reg. Stud. 42:6 (2008), 817–835.
• Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E., Silverman, B.S., Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strateg. Manag. J. 17 (1996), 77–91.
• Munari, F., Malipiero, A., Sobrero, M., Focal firms as technological gatekeepers within industrial districts: evidence from the packaging machinery industry. Ind. Corp. Change 21 (2005), 429–462.
• Oliver, J.L.H., Garrigos, J.A., Porta, J.I.D., External ties and the reduction of knowledge asymmetries among clusters within global value chains: the case of the ceramic tile district of Castellon. Eur. Plan. Stud. 16:4 (2008), 507–520.
• Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W.W., Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15:1 (2004), 5–21.
• Parra-Requena, G., Molina-Morales, F.X., García-Villaverde, P.M., The mediating effect of cognitive social capital on knowledge acquisition in clustered firms. Growth Change 41 (2010), 59–84.
• Parrilli, M.D., Sacchetti, S., Linking learning with governance in networks and clusters: key issues for analysis and policy. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 20:4 (2008), 387–408.
• Peiró-Palomino, J., Tortosa-Ausina, E., Can trust effects on development be generalized? A response by quantile. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 32 (2013), 377–390.
• Pennings, J.M., Harianto, F., The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 13:1 (1992), 29–46.
• Phelps, C., Heidl, R., Wadhwa, A., Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks a review and research agenda. J. Manag. 38:4 (2012), 1115–1166.
• Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., García-Reche, A., What makes environmental performance differ between firms? Empirical evidence from the Spanish tile industry. Environ. Plan. A 39:9 (2007), 2232–2247.
• Piore, M., Sabel, C., The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. 1984, Basic Books, New York.
• Porter, M.E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations. 1990, Free Press, New York.
• Porter, M.E., Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv. Bus. Rev., 1998, 77–90.
• Porter, M.E., Takeuchi, H., Sakakibara, M., Can Japan Compete?. 2000, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
• Prahalad, C.K., Bettis, R.A., The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 7:6 (1986), 485–501.
• Provan, K.G., Fish, A., Sydow, J., Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks. J. Manag. 33:3 (2007), 479–516.
• Schmitz, H., Does local co-operation matter? Evidence from industrial clusters in South Asia and Latin America. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 28:3 (2000), 323–336.
• Shipilov, A.V., Firm scope experience, historic multimarket contact with partners, centrality, and the relationship between structural holes and performance. Organ. Sci. 20:1 (2009), 85–106.
• Stock, G.N., Greis, N.P., Fischer, W.A., Absorptive capacity and new product development. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 12:1 (2001), 77–91.
• Stork, D., Richards, W.D., Nonrespondents in communication network studies: problems and possibilities. Group Organ. Manag. 17:2 (1992), 193–209.
• Tavassoli, S., Tsagdis, D., Critical success factors and cluster evolution: a case study of the Linköping ICT cluster lifecycle. Environ. Plan. A 46:6 (2014), 1425–1444.
• Tomlinson, P.R., Co-operative ties and innovation: some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Res. Policy 39:6 (2010), 762–775.
• Tsai, W., Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 44:5 (2001), 996–1004.
• Tsai, W., Ghoshal, S., Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Manag. J. 41:4 (1998), 464–478.
• Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem. Am. J. Sociol. 111:2 (2005), 447–504.
• Von Hippel, E., Has a customer already developed your next product?. Sloan Manag. Rev. 18:2 (1977), 63–74.
• Ybarra, J.A., Determinación cuantitativa de distritos industriales: la experiencia del País Valenciano. Estud. Territoriales 37 (1991), 53–67.
• Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., Sapienza, H.J., Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 22:6–7 (2001), 587–613.
• Zaheer, A., Bell, G.G., Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 26:9 (2005), 809–825.
• Zahra, S.A., George, G., Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27:2 (2002), 185–203.