¿Se comportan más éticamente las consejeras que los consejeros de las comisiones de auditoría respecto a la calidad de la información contable?

Referencias bibliográficas

• Act 3/2007, of 22 March, for Effective Equality between Women and Men.
• Adams, R. B. y Ferreira, D. (2012). Regulatory pressure and bank directors' incentives to attend board meetings. International Review of Finance, 12(2), 227-248.
• Aldama Report 2003. Informe de la Comisión Especial para el Fomento de la Transparencia y la Seguridad en los Mercados Financieros y en las Sociedades Cotizadas. Madrid.
• Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the Board of Director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-465.
• Bradbury, M. E. (1990). The incentives for voluntary Audit Committee formation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9(1), 9-36.
• Burgess, Z. y Tharenou, P. (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 39-49.
• Carcello, J. V. y Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit Committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453-467.
• Carcello, J. V. y Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit Committee independence and disclosure: choice for financially distressed firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(4), 289-299.
• Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J. y Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
• Carter, D. A., Simkins, F. y Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414.
• DeFond, M. L. y Francis, J. R. (2006). Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 24 (Suppl.), 5-30.
• Evans, G. S. (2013). Fiscal irresponsibility due to lack of women on Boards. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(3), 112-124.
• Faccio, M. y Lang, L. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365-395.
• Fernández-Méndez, C. y Arrondo-García, R. (2007). The effects of ownership structure and board composition on the audit committee meeting frequency: Spanish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 909-922.
• Fudenberg, D. y Tirole, J. (1995). A theory of income and dividend smoothing based on incumbency rents.
• Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 75-93. Hadani, M., Goranova, M. y Khan, R. (2011). Institutional investors, shareholder activism, and earnings management. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1352-1360.
• Heidrick y Struggles (2011). Challenging board performance. European Report on corporate governance: Heidrick & Struggles.
• Huang, T-C., Huang, H-W. y Lee, C-C. (2014). Corporate executive's gender and audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(6), 527-547.
• Ittonen, K., Miettinen, J. y Vähämaa, S. (2010). Does female representation in audit committees affect audit fees? Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 49(3-4), 113-139.
• Jensen, M. C. y Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
• Jones, F. L. (1996). The information content of the auditor’s going concern evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 15(1), 1-27.
• Khan, W. A. y Vieito, J. V. (2013). CEO gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55-66.
• Khazanchi, D. (1995). Unethical behavior in information systems: The gender factor. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 741-749.
• Kirchmaier, T. y Grant, J. (2004). Corporate ownership structure and performance in Europe. European Management Review, 2(3), 231-241.
• Klein, A. (2002). Audit Committee, Board of Director characteristics and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375-400.
• Law 26/2003, Spanish Listed Companies Transparency Act.
• Law 44/2002, of 22 November, Law on Measures to Reform the Financial System (BOE de 23 de noviembre).
• Lee, Y.-C. (2013). Can independent directors improve the quality of earnings? Evidence from Taiwan. Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 3(3), 45-66.
• Man, C.-K. y Wong, B. (2013). Corporate governance and earnings management: A survey of literature. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(2), 391-418.
• McMullen, D. A. (1996). Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences associated with Audit Committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15(1), 87-103.
• Miguel, A. de, Pindado, J. y Torre, C. de la (2004). Ownership structure and firm value: New evidence from Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1199-1207.
• Mutchler, J. F. (1984). Auditors’ perceptions of the going-concern opinion decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 3(2), 17-30.
• Nielsen, S. y Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on Boards of Directors: Going beyond the Surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136-148.
• Niskanen, J., Karjalainen, J., Niskanen, M. y Karjalainen, J. (2011). Auditor gender and corporate earnings management behavior in private Finnish firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(9), 778-793.
• Olivencia Report (1998). El Buen Gobierno de las Sociedades. Madrid: Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda.
• Parrotta, P. y Smith, N. (2013). Female-Led Firms: Performance and Risk Attitudes. Working Paper. Recuperado de <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2329083>.
• Peng, Q. (2007). Two essays on women executives and corporate decisions. Thesis, Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University.
• Pomeroy, B. y Thornton, D. B. (2008). Meta-analysis and the accounting literature: The case of Audit Committee independence and financial reporting quality. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 305-330.
• Pucheta-Martínez, M. C. y Fuentes-Barberá, C. de (2007). The impact of Audit Committee characteristics on the enhancement of the quality of financial reporting: an empirical study in the Spanish context. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1394-1412.
• Pulford, B. D. y Colman, A. M. (1997). Overconfidence: Feedback and item difficulty effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(1), 125-133.
• Qi, B. y Tian, G. (2012). The impact of Audit Committees’ personal characteristics on earnings management: Evidence from China. Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(6), 1331-1343.
• Schwartz-Ziv, M. (2011). Are all welcome a-board: What do women directors bring to the table? Working Paper. Recuperado de <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1868033>.
• Shivdasami, A. (1993). Boards composition, ownerships structure and hostile takeovers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1), 167-198.
• Song, J. y Windram, B. (2004). Benchmarking Audit Committee effectiveness in financial reporting. International Journal of Auditing, 8(3), 195-205.
• Srinidhi, B., Ferdinand G. y Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610-1644.
• Terjesen, S., Sealy, R. y Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320-337.
• Thorne, L., Massey, D. y Magnan, M. (2003). Institutional context and auditors’ moral reasoning: A Cana- da-. U.S.A. comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 305-321.
• Unified Code of Corporate Governance (CUBG) (2006). Informe del grupo especial de trabajo sobre buen gobierno de las sociedades cotizadas. Madrid: Comité Conthe.
• Velury, U. y Jenkins, D. S. (2006). Institutional ownership and the quality of earnings. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 1043-1051.