Implicación, Compromiso y Centralidad con el Trabajo¿Es o no es el mismo concepto?

  1. Gracía Lerín, Francisco Javier
  2. Carrero Planes, Virginia
  3. Pinazo Calatayud, Daniel
Revista:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Año de publicación: 2001

Volumen: 17

Número: 1

Páginas: 109-121

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

Resumen

This is a theoretical study about the meaning of the difference between job involvement, commitment and centrality. Conceptual differences are discussed following a literature review of theoretical and empirical contributions. There is also a discussion about how research has addressed these concepts. The authors of this paper wonder whether these are different concepts or just the same construct with different names. Some conclusions are offered for a discussion on the existence of a common construct.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allport, G. W. (1947). The psychology of participation. Psychological Review, 52, 117-132.
  • Blau, G. (1985). A multiple study investigation of the dimensionality of job involvement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 19-26.
  • Blau, G.; Paul, A. y Stjohn, N. (1993). On developing a general index of work commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 298-314.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
  • Blood, M. R. (1969). Work values and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 456-459.
  • Cook, J. D.; Hepworth, S.J.; Wall, T. D. y Warr, P. B. (1981). The experience of work. New York: Academic Press.
  • Dubin, R. (1956). Industrial workers' worlds: a study of the <<central life interests» of industrial workers. Social Problems, 3, 131-142.
  • Faunce, W. (1959). Occupational involvement and the selective testing of self-esteem. Trabajo presentado al Meeting of the American Sociology Association Meeting, Chicago.
  • Fineman, S. (1991). The meaning of working?. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 1, (2/3), 166-173.
  • Greeenhaus, J. H. (1973). A factorial investigation of career salience. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 3, 95-98.
  • Guion, R. (1958). Industrial morale: The problem of terminology. Personnel Psychology, 11, 59-61.
  • Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341-349.
  • Lawler, E. E. (1969). Job design and employee motivation. Personnel Psychology, 22, 426-435.
  • Lodahl, T. Y Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
  • Maurer, J. G. (1969). Work role involvement of industrial supervisors. East Lansing: MSU Business Studies.
  • Mirels, H. L. y Garret, J. B. (1971). The protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40-44.
  • Moen, P. y Smith, K. R. (1986). Women at work: Commitment and behavior over the life course. Sociological Forum, 1, 3, 450-475.
  • Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8, 486-500.
  • Morrow, P. C.; Eastman, K. y McElroy, J. C. (1991). Concept redundancy and rater naivety in organizational research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 3, 219-232.
  • Morrow, P. C. y Goetz, J. F. Jr. (1988). Professionalism as a form of work commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 92-111.
  • Morrow, P. C. y McElroy, J. C. (1986). On assessing measures of work commitment. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 7, 139-145.
  • Morrow, P. C. y Wirth, R. E. (1989). Work commitment among salaried professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 40-56.
  • Morse, N. C. y Weiss, R. S. (1955). The function and meaning of work and the job. American Sociological review, 20, 191-198.
  • MOW-International Research Team (1987): The meaning of working. London: Academic Press.
  • Mowday, R. T.; Steers, R. M. y Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 244-247.
  • Northrop, F. S. C. (1959). The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan.
  • O'Brien, G. E. (1991). Changing meanings of working. En J.F. Hartley y G.M. Stephenson (eds.), Socialization into employment. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 44-66.
  • Rabinowitz, S. y Hall, D. T. (1977). Organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 2, 265-288.
  • Ruiz Quintanilla, S. A. y Wilpert, B. (1991). Are work meanings changing?. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 1, (2/3), 91-109.
  • Saleh, S. D. y Hosek, J. (1976). Job involvement: Concepts and measurements. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 213-224.
  • Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. En B. Staw y L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 3-43.
  • Smith, P. C.; Kendall, L. M. y Hulin, (1969). The measurement of satisfaction and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Super, D. E. (1976). Career education and the meanings of work. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Sverko, B. (1989). Origin of individual differences in importance attached to work. A model and a contribution to its evaluation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 28-39.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet