Influencia de los métodos de enseñanza en el aprendizaje y desarrollo de la lectura

  1. Marí Sanmillán, Mª Isabel 1
  2. Gil Lario, Mª Dolores 2
  3. Ceccato, Roberta 3
  1. 1 Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Castellón de la Plana
  2. 2 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  3. 3 Universidad Internacional de Valencia (VIU)
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

ISSN: 0214-9877

Año de publicación: 2019

Título del ejemplar: Psicología de la Educación y Saberes Originarios

Volumen: 3

Número: 1

Páginas: 177-186

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17060/IJODAEP.2019.N1.V3.1467 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Learning reading involves skills such as phonological awareness, alphabetic knowledge and naming speed. Different teaching methods have a different effect on their acquisition differently. This study analyses 1) the differential effect of analytic and synthetic phonological methods of acquiring reading skills, 2) whether the differences found, according to the method, followed the same pattern in the first four years of initial reading and 3) the effectiveness of the methods of teaching reading on reading performance in each one of the four years of initial reading studies. Therefore, cross-sectional study was conducted. Sample consisted of 614 children of kindergarten (aged 4 and 5), and first and second grade students (aged 6 and 7) from schools located in Valencia and Castellon. Instruments applied was RAN (Rapid Automatized Naming Test) and BIL (Initial Reading Program) (aged 4 and 5), and ACL (Reading Comprehension Test), DST-J (Dyslexia Screening Test) and a subtest of PROLEC-R (Battery for the Evaluation of Reading Processes revised) (aged 6 and 7). Theanalysis consisted of some t-tests to compare the effect of the two study methods at different developmental stages on the analyzed variables and two-factor (year and method) MANOVAs were used for each educational level. Results show the weight of the major reading skills involved vary throughout the process, so phonological awareness, naming speed or alphabetic knowledge have greater relevance during the early school years, while naming speed stands apart as the only variable at ages 6 and 7, when reading requirements change. The synthetic phonological method enhances the most important skills in learning to read in kindergarten, while in Primary Education, the global method provides more successful results in reading performance. The differential influence method has on reading performance also depends on the educational stage.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Araújo, S., Inácio, F., Francisco, A., Faísca, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2011). Component processes subserving rapid automatized naming in dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers. Dyslexia, 17, 242–255.
  • Carril, I., (2008, febrero). Pasado, presente y futuro de la metodología. Ponencia presentada en el Congreso Internacional de animación a la lectura. Morelia-Michoacán-México. Recuperado 5 enero, 2015 de http://www.waece.org/memoriascongresos/morelia2008/PDF/PONENCIA01.pdf
  • Català, G., Català, M.; Molina, E., & Monclús, R. (2001). Evaluación de la Comprensión Lectora. Pruebas ACL (1-6 grado de primaria). España: Editorial Graó.
  • Connelly, V., Thompson, G. B., Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., & McKay, M. F. (2009). Does the type of reading instruction have an influence on how readers process print? In C. Wood, & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in reading and spelling (pp. 239–253). London: Routledge.
  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R., & Stephenson, K. (2008). Rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing, and different reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 325–350.
  • Cuetos, F. (2010). Psicología de la lectura. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer España.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2014). PROLEC-R. Batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores, revisada (5ª edición). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
  • Defior, S. & Serrano, F. (2011). Procesos fonológicos explícitos e implícitos. Lectura y Dislexia. Revista de Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencias, 11, 79-94.
  • Eurydice. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (2012). La atención al alumnado con dislexia en el sistema educativo en el contexto de las necesidades específicas de apoyo educativo. España: Colección Eurydice España–Redie. Recuperado 6 febrero, 2016 de https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/la-atencion-al-alumnado-con-dislexia-en-el-sistema-educativo-en-elcontexto-de-las-necesidades-especificas-de-apoyo-educativo/educacion-especial-y-compensatoria/15956
  • Fawcett, A.J. & Nicolson, R.I. (2004). Test para la Detección de la Dislexia en Niños, DST-J. Oxford. Pearson Assesment. Adaptación española (2010) Madrid. TEA
  • Johnston, R. S., & Thompson, G. B. (1989). Is dependence on phonological information in children’s reading a product of instructional approach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 131–145.
  • López-Escribano, C. & Katzir, T. (2008). Are phonological processes separate from the processes underlying naming speed in a shallow orthography? Education Psychology, 16, 641-666.
  • McGeown, S. P., Johnston, R. S., & Medford, E. (2012). Reading instruction affects the cognitive skills supporting early reading development. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 360-
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literatura on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Simpson, I, Caravolas, M. & Defior, S. (2011). Letter knowledge, phoneme awareness and RAN as predictors of reading fluency in Spanish. 10th Symposium of Psycholinguistics, San Sebastián, April 13th-16th Sellés, P. (2008). Elaboración de una prueba de habilidades relacionadas con el desarrollo inicial de la lectura (BIL 3-6). Tesis. Universitat de Valencia, Valencia.
  • Sellés, P., Martínez, T., Vidal-Abarca, E. & Gilabert, R. (2008). Batería de inicio a la lectura para niños de 3 a 6 años. Madrid: ICCE.
  • Usero Alijarde, A. (2011). Letrilandia. Libros de lectura. Propuesta didáctica. Zaragoza: Edelvives.
  • Wolf, M., & Denckla, M. (2003). Rapid Automatized Naming Tests. Greenville, SC: Super Duper.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet