Indicadores del proceso de control de la propia comprensión durante la lectura de textos de ciencias

  1. Calvo Valiente, Juan José 1
  2. Gómez López, Ángela 1
  3. Fernández Rivera, Juan José 2
  4. Sanjosé López, Vicente 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 Universitat Jaume I. Castellón
Journal:
Ápice: revista de educación científica

ISSN: 2531-016X

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 3

Issue: 1

Pages: 1-13

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17979/AREC.2019.3.1.4624 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Ápice: revista de educación científica

Abstract

The present work aimed at analyzing the actions made when readers try to monitor their comprehension of science texts. University pre-service teachers read-and-judged the comprehensibility of manipulated texts having embedded inconsistencies which involved main ideas. Task was made individually on a computer and reader’s actions and result were registered using the software Read & Answer. In line with models for comprehension of information, and for monitoring some “process indicators” were proposed. These indicators were elaborated from the data registered by Read & Answer and proved to be high effective in discriminating correct from wrong outputs in the monitoring task.

Bibliographic References

  • Alexander, P. A. y Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. En M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson y R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. 3 (chapter 19). New York: Routledge.
  • Baker, L. (1979). Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11(4), 365-374. Recuperado de: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10862967909547342
  • Cerdán, R., Vidal-Abarca, E., Salmerón, L., Martínez, T. y Gilabert, R. (2009). Read & Answer, A tool to capture on-line processing of electronic texts. The Ergonomics Open Journal, 2, 133-140. Recuperado de: https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOERGJ/TOERGJ-2-133.pdf
  • Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Daneman, M. y Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 3(4), 422-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546
  • Dignath, C. y Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
  • Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F. y White, R. T. (Eds.) (2013). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Gromley, J.G. (2005). Metacognition, cognitive strategy instruction and reading in adult literacy. Hillsdole: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
  • Huitema, J. S., Dopkins, S., Klin, C. M. y Myers, J. L. (1993). Connecting goals and actions during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1053-1060. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1053
  • Kintsch, W. y van Dijk, T. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394. Recuperado de: http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Towards%20a%20model.pdf
  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kolić‐Vehovec, S. y Bajšanski, I. (2007). Comprehension monitoring and reading comprehension in bilingual students. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(2), 198-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00319.x
  • Krasiejko, I. (2010). The role of metacognition in education. The New Educational Review, 20(1), 120-128. Recuperado de: http://selfregulation.pbworks.com/f/ Metacognition-Self+Regulation-Strategies.pdf
  • Nelson, T. y Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
  • Otero, J., Campanario, J. y Hopkins, K. (1992). The relationship between academic achievement and metacognitive comprehension monitoring ability of Spanish secondary school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(3), 419-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052002017
  • Otero, J. y Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3(4), 229-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00034.x
  • Primativo S, Spinelli D, Zoccolotti P, De Luca, M. y Martelli M (2016) Perceptual and Cognitive Factors Imposing “Speed Limits” on Reading Rate: A Study with the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. PLoS ONE 11(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0153786
  • Sánchez-Miguel, E. y García-Rodicio, H. (2014). Comprensión de textos: conceptos básicos y avances en la investigación actual. Aula, 20, 83-103. Recuperado de: http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0214-3402/article/viewFile/12563/12912
  • Sanjosé, V., Fernández, J.J. y Vidal-Abarca, E. (2010). Importancia de las destrezas de procesamiento de la información en la comprensión de textos científicos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33(4), 529-541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1174/ 021037010793139581
  • Sanjosé, V., Vidal-Abarca, E., Padilla, O.M. (2006). A connectionist extension to Kintsch’s Construction-Integration model. Discourse Processes, 42(1), 1-35.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4201_1
  • Saux, G., Irrazabal, N. y Burin, D. I. (2014). Comprensión de textos de ciencias en estudiantes universitarios: generación de inferencias causales durante la lectura. Liberabit, 20(2), 305-313. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.pe/ pdf/liber/v20n2/a11v20n2.pdf
  • Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K. y Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 9(10), 2195-2200. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199807130-00009
  • Van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A. y van Lieshout, E. C. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1665-1690. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11145-011-9337-4
  • Veenman, M., Wilhelm, P. y Beishuizen, J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 89-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004
  • Vosniadou, S., Pearson, P. D. y Rogers, T. (1988). What causes children's failures to detect inconsistencies in text? Representation versus comparison difficulties. Journal of educational psychology, 80(1), 27-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.27
  • Wang, M., Haertel, G. y Walberg, H. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063003249
Data source: Dialnet