Improving the likelihood of SME survival during financial and economic crisesThe importance of TMTs and family ownership for ambidexterity

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alcaide, P., Balance Económico Regional (Autonomías y Provincias). Años 2000 a 2010. 2011, Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros, Madrid.
• Aldrich, H., Organizations and Environments. 1979, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
• Altman, E.I., Sabato, G., Modelling credit risk for SMEs: evidence from the US market. Abacus 43:3 (2007), 332–357.
• Anderson, R.C., Mansi, S.A., Reeb, D.M., Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. J. Financ. Econ. 68:2 (2003), 263–285.
• Anderson, R.C., Reeb, D.M., Founding family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. J. Finance 58:3 (2003), 1301–1328.
• Bascle, G., Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strateg. Organ. 6:3 (2008), 285–327.
• Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gómez-Mejía, L.R., Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Fam. Bus. Rev. 25:3 (2012), 258–279.
• Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gómez-Mejía, L.R., Larraza-Kintana, M., Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55:1 (2010), 82–113.
• Binacci, M., Peruffo, E., Oriani, R., Minichilli, A., Are all non-family managers (NFMs) equal? The impact of NFM characteristics and diversity on family firm performance. Corp. Gov. 24:6 (2016), 569–583.
• Birkinshaw, J., Gupta, K., Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 27:4 (2013), 287–298.
• Blanco, F., Fernández, M., Ferrando, M., El impacto de la crisis económica en las pymes españolas. La evolución de las Pymes en España, 2016, Colegio de economistas de Madrid, n° 149.
• Block, J.H., R&D investments in family and founder firms: an agency perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 27 (2012), 248–265.
• Block, J.H., Miller, D., Jaskiewicz, P., Spiegel, F., Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: an analysis of patent data. Fam. Bus. Rev. 26:2 (2013), 180–199.
• Boeker, W., Karichalil, R., Entrepreneurial transitions: factors influencing founder departure. Acad. Manag. J. 45:4 (2002), 818–826.
• Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M., The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42 (1997), 1–34.
• Camelo-Ordaz, C., Hernández-Lara, A.B., Valle-Cabrera, R., The relationship between top management teams and innovative capacity in companies. J. Manag. Dev. 24:8 (2005), 683–705.
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., Zhang, H., Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organ. Sci. 20:4 (2009), 781–796.
• Cao, Q., Simsek, Z., Zhang, H., Modelling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity. J. Manag. Stud. 47:7 (2010), 1272–1296.
• Carney, M., Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family–controlled firms. Entrep. Theory Pract. 29:3 (2005), 249–265.
• Chen, D., Research on performance management of Chinese SME. Int. J. Bus. Manag., 6(4), 2011, 263.
• Chen, H.L., Hsu, W.T., Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Fam. Bus. Rev. 22:4 (2009), 347–362.
• Chrisman, J.J., Patel, P.C., Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Acad. Manag. J. 55 (2012), 976–997.
• Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., De Massis, A., Wang, H., Reflections on family firm goals and the assessment of performance. J. Fam. Bus. Strat. 9 (2018), 107–113.
• Corona, J., La empresa familiar en España (2015). 2015, Instituto de la Empresa Familiar.
• Crespí R., Martín-Oliver, A., Do family firms have better access to external finance during crises?. Corp. Gov. 23:3 (2015), 249–265.
• De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: implications for theory and empirical studies. J. Small Bus. Manag. 52:2 (2014), 344–364.
• Duncan, R., The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation. Killman, R.H., Pondy, L.R., Sleven, D., (eds.) The Management of Organization, 1976, North Holland, New York, 167–188.
• Ebben, J.J., Johnson, A.C., Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strat. Manag. J. 26:13 (2005), 1249–1259.
• Escribá-Esteve, A., Sánchez-Peinado, L., Sánchez-Peinado, E., Moderating influences on the firm's strategic orientation-performance relationship. Int. Small Bus. J. 26:4 (2008), 463–489.
• Fernández-Mesa, A., Iborra, M., Safón, V., CEO-TMT interaction: do tenure and age affect ambidexterity dynamism?. Eur. J. Int. Manag. 7:1 (2013), 31–55.
• Filser, M., De Massis, A., Gast, J., Kraus, S., Niemand, T., Tracing the roots of innovativeness in family SMEs: the effect of family functionality and socioemotional wealth. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 35:4 (2018), 609–628.
• Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D.C., Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35 (1990), 484–503.
• Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D.C., Cannella, A.A., Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. 2009, Oxford University Press, USA.
• Friedlander, F., Pickle, H., Components of effectiveness in small organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart., 1968, 289–304.
• García-Granero, A., Fernández-Mesa, A., Jansen, J.J., Vega-Jurado, J., Top management team diversity and ambidexterity: the contingent role of shared responsibility and CEO cognitive trust. Long Range Plann., 2017, 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.11.001.
• Gedajlovic, E., Cao, Q., Zhang, H., Corporate shareholdings and organizational ambidexterity in high-tech SMEs: evidence from a transitional economy. J. Bus. Venturing 27:6 (2012), 652–665.
• Gedajlovic, E., Lubatkin, M.H., Schulze, W.S., Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: a governance perspective. J. Manag. Stud. 41:5 (2004), 899–912.
• Gibson, C.A.B., Birkinshaw, J., The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Manag. J. 47:2 (2004), 209–226.
• Gibson, J.L., Ivanevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H. Jr., Organizations: Structure, Process, Behavior. 1973, Dallas, TX, BPI.
• Gómez-Mejía, L.R., Campbell, J., Martin, G., Hoskisson, R.E., Makri, M., Sirmon, D.G., Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrep. Theory Pract., 2014, 1351–1374.
• Gómez-Mejía, L.R., Haynes, K.T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K.J., Moyano-Fuentes, J., Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52:1 (2007), 106–137.
• Gómez-Mejía, L.R., Makri, M., Lazarra, M., Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. J. Manag. Stud. 47:2 (2010), 223–252.
• Guariglia, A., Spaliara, M.E., Tsoukas, S., To what extent does the interest burden affect firm survival? Evidence from a panel of UK firms during the recent financial crisis. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 78:4 (2016), 576–594.
• Gulati, R., Puranam, P., Renewal through reorganization: the value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. 20:2 (2009), 422–440.
• Hambrick, D.C., Mason, P.A., Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9:2 (1984), 193–206.
• Hamilton, B.H., Nickerson, J.A., Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strateg. Organ. 1:1 (2003), 51–78.
• Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J., Obstacles to comparative studies. Goodman, P.S., Pennings, J.M., (eds.) New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness, 1977, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 106–131.
• Haveman, H.A., Ghosts of managers past: managerial succession and organizational mortality. Acad. Manag. J. 36:4 (1993), 864–881.
• He, Z.L., Wong, P.K., Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. 15:4 (2004), 481–494.
• Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Distributed cognition in top management teams and organizational ambidexterity. The influence of transactive memory systems. J. Manag. 43:3 (2014), 919–945.
• Hiebl, M.R.W., Family involvement and organizational ambidexterity in later-generation family businesses: a framework for further investigation. Manag. Decis. 53:5 (2015), 1061–1082.
• Hill, S.A., Birkinshaw, J., Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. J. Manag. 40:7 (2014), 1899–1931.
• Hughes, M., Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars. J. Mark. Manag., 2018, 10.1080/0267257X.2018.1441175.
• Hughes, M., Filser, M., Harms, R., Kraus, S., Chang, M.-L., Cheng, C.-F., Family firms configurations for high performance: the role of entrepreneurship and ambidexterity. Br. Acad. Manag., 2017, 1–18.
• Ibrahim, A.B., McGuire, J., Soufani, K., An empirical investigation of factors contributing to longevity of small family firms. Glob. Econ. Finance J. 2:2 (2009), 1–21.
• INE, 2011. Demografía Armonizada de Empresas. Año 2009. http://www.ine.es/prensa/np686.pdf (accessed on 27 April 2018).
• INE, 2017. Estadística del procedimiento concursal. Varios años. http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es.
• Jansen, J.J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F.A., Volberda, H.W., Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: the moderating role of transformational leadership. J. Manag. Stud. 45:5 (2008), 982–1007.
• Jansen, J.J., Van Den Bosch, F.A., Volberda, H.W., Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag. Sci. 52:11 (2006), 1661–1674.
• Jaw, Y.L., Lin, W.T., Corporate elite characteristics and firm's internationalization: CEO-level and TMT-level roles. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 20:1 (2009), 220–233.
• Josefy, M.A., Harrison, J.S., Sirmon, D.G., Carnes, C., Living and dying: synthesizing the literature on firm survival and failure across stages of development. Acad. Manag. Ann. 11:2 (2017), 770–799.
• Junni, P., Sarala, R.M., Taras, V., Tarba, S.Y., Organizational ambidexterity and performance: a meta-analysis. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 27:4 (2013), 299–312.
• Kanter, R.M., Brinkerhoff, D., Organizational performance: recent developments in measurement. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 7:1 (1981), 321–349.
• Kellermanns, F.W., Eddleston, K.A., Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: a family perspective. Entrep. Theory Pract. 30:6 (2006), 809–830.
• König, A., Kammerlander, N., Enders, A., The family innovator's dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38:3 (2013), 418–441.
• Lavie, D., Stettner, U., Tushman, M.L., Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Manag. Ann. 4:1 (2010), 109–155.
• Le Breton-Miller, L., Miller, D., Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrep. Theory Pract. 30:6 (2006), 731–746.
• Levinthal, D.A., March, J.G., The myopia of learning. Strat. Manag. J. 14:S2 (1993), 95–112.
• Linnenluecke, M.K., Resilience in business and management research: a review of influential publications and a research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 19:1 (2017), 4–30.
• Ling, Y., Kellermanns, F.W., The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: the moderating role of information exchange frequency. J. Manag. Stud. 47:2 (2010), 322–344.
• Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., Veiga, J.F., Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J. Manag. 32:5 (2006), 646–672.
• March, J.G., Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:1 (1991), 71–87.
• March, J.G., Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strat. Manag. J. 27:3 (2006), 201–214.
• McClelland, P.L., Barker, V.L., Oh, W., CEO career horizon and tenure: future performance implications under different contingencies. J. Bus. Res. 65:9 (2011), 1387–1393.
• McClelland, P.L., Liang, X., Barker, V.L., CEO commitment to the status quo: replication and extension using content analysis. J. Manag. 36:5 (2010), 1251–1277.
• McGuinness, G., Hogan, T., Powell, R., European trade credit use and SME survival. J. Corp. Finance 49 (2018), 81–103.
• McNamara, P., Baden-Fuller, C., Lessons from the Celltech case: balancing knowledge exploration and exploitation in organizational renewal. Br. J. Manag. 10:4 (1999), 291–307.
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R.H., Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organ. Sci. 24:1 (2013), 189–209.
• Milliken, F.J., Martins, L.L., Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21:2 (1996), 402–433.
• Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., MacMillan, I.C., Top management teams in family-controlled companies: ‘familiness’ ‘faultlines’ and their impact on financial performance. J. Manag. Stud. 47:2 (2010), 205–222.
• Mintzberg, H., Power In and Around Organizations. 1983, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
• Moon, H., Yim, S., Re-interpreting ownership advantages and re-categorizing investment motivations of multinational corporations: from the perspective of imbalance theory. J. Int. Area Stud., 2014, 87–99.
• Muñoz-Bullón, F., Sánchez-Bueno, M.J., The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Fam. Bus. Rev. 24:1 (2011), 62–70.
• Niebler, A., Informe sobre las empresas familiares en Europa (2014/2210(INI)). 2014, Comisión de Industria, Investigación y Energía Documento de sesión A8-0223/2015 30.6.2015.
• Nielsen, S., Top management team diversity: a review of theories and methodologies. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 12:3 (2010), 301–316.
• Nieto, M.J., Santamaria, L., Fernandez, Z., Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. J. Small Bus. Manag. 53:2 (2015), 382–399.
• O'Reilly, C.A., Tushman, M.L., Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. 28 (2008), 185–206.
• O'Reilly, C.A., Tushman, M.L., Organizational ambidexterity in action: how managers explore and exploit. Calif. Manag. Rev. 53:4 (2011), 5–22.
• O'Reilly, C.A., Tushman, M.L., Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 27:4 (2013), 324–338.
• OECD, 2009. The Impact of the Global Crisis on SME and Entrepreneurship Financing and Policy Responses. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development online report. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/43183090.pdf.
• OECD, 2018. Business demography indicators. Structural and Demographic Business Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/9e2bb05a-en (accessed on 27 April 2018).
• Pertusa-Ortega, E.M., Molina-Azorín, J.F., A joint analysis of determinants and performance consequences of ambidexterity. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 21:2 (2018), 84–98.
• Piao, M., Thriving in the new: implication of exploration on organizational longevity. J. Manag. 36:6 (2010), 1529–1554.
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol., 88(5), 2003, 879.
• Raisch, S., Hotz, F., Shaping the context for learning: corporate alignment initiatives, environmental munificence, and firm performance. Wall, S., Zimmermann, C., Klingebiel, R., Lange, D., (eds.) Strategic Reconfigurations: Building Dynamic Capabilities, 2008, Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Rivas, J.L., Board versus TMT international experience: a study of their joint effects. Cross Cult. Manag. 19:4 (2012), 546–562.
• Romanelli, E., Tushman, M.L., Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: an empirical test. Acad. Manag. J. 37:5 (1994), 1141–1166.
• Romano, C.A., Tanewski, G.A., Smyrnios, K.X., Capital structure decision making: a model for family business. J. Bus. Venturing 16:3 (2000), 285–310.
• Ruiz-Jiménez, J.M., Fuentes-Fuentes, M.M., Management capabilities, innovation, and gender diversity in the top management team: an empirical analysis in technology-based SMEs. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 19 (2016), 107–121.
• Sánchez, A.R.P., García, M.J., Chico, J.R., Análisis sectorial: el impacto de la crisis económica en las regiones españolas. Documentos de trabajo (Centro de Estudios Andaluces) 1 (2013), 1–46.
• Sarkees, M., Hulland, J., Chatterjee, R., Investments in exploitation and exploration capabilities: balance versus focus. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 22:1 (2014), 7–24.
• Schmitt, A., Probst, G., Tushman, M.L., M@n@gement in times of economic crisis: insights into organizational ambidexterity. M@n@gement 13:3 (2010), 128–150.
• Schmitt, A., Raisch, S., Corporate turnarounds: the duality of retrenchment and recovery. J. Manag. Stud. 50:7 (2013), 1216–1244.
• Schulze, W.S., Gedajlovic, E.R., Whither family business?. J. Manag. Stud. 47:2 (2010), 191–204.
• Sciascia, S., Nordqvist, M., Mazzola, P., De Massis, A., Family ownership and R&D intensity in small and medium sized firms. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32:3 (2015), 349–360.
• Simons, T., Pelled, L.H., Smith, K.A., Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management team. Acad. Manag. J. 42:6 (1999), 662–673.
• Simsek, Z., CEO tenure and organizational performance: an intervening model. Strat. Manag. J. 28:6 (2007), 653–662.
• Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J.F., Souder, D., A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. J. Manag. Stud. 46:5 (2009), 864–894.
• Simsek, Z., Jansen, J.J., Minichilli, A., Escriba-Esteve, A., Strategic leadership and leaders in entrepreneurial contexts: a nexus for innovation and impact missed?. J. Manag. Stud. 52:4 (2015), 463–478.
• Smith, W.K., Tushman, M.L., Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16:5 (2005), 522–536.
• Steers, R.M., Problems in the measurement of organizational effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart., 1975, 546–558.
• Stubner, S., Blarr, W.H., Brands, C., Wulf, T., Organizational ambidexterity and family firm performance. J. Small Bus. Entrepren. 25:2 (2012), 217–229.
• Teece, D.J., Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat. Manag. J. 28:13 (2007), 1319–1350.
• Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Manag. J., 1997, 509–533.
• Thompson, J.D., McEwen, W.J., Organizational goals and environment: goal-setting as an interaction process. Am. Sociol. Rev. 23:1 (1958), 23–31.
• Thornhill, S., Amit, R., Learning about failure: bankruptcy, firm age, and the resource-based view. Organ. Sci. 14:5 (2003), 497–509.
• Tollin, K., Schmidt, M., Marketing's contribution from the perspective of marketing executives. Mark. Intell. Plann. 33:7 (2015), 1047–1070.
• Tushman, M.L., O'Reilly, C.A., The ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Manag. Rev. 38:4 (1996), 8–30.
• Van Der Merwe, S.P., An investigation of the determinants of estate and retirement planning in intergenerational family businesses. S. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 40:3 (2009), 51–63.
• Veider, V., Matzler, K., The ability and willingness of family-controlled firms to arrive at organizational ambidexterity. J. Fam. Bus. Strategy 7:2 (2016), 105–116.
• Vermoesen, V., Deloof, M., Laveren, E., Long-term debt maturity and financing constraints of SMEs during the global financial crisis. Small Bus. Econ. 41:2 (2013), 433–448.
• Voss, G.B., Voss, Z.G., Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains. Organ. Sci. 24:5 (2012), 1459–1477.
• Webb, J.W., Ketchen, D.J., Ireland, R.D., Strategic entrepreneurship within family-controlled firms: opportunities and challenges. J. Fam. Bus. Strategy 1:2 (2010), 67–77.
• Wiersema, M.F., Bantel, K.A., Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Manag. J. 35:1 (1992), 91–121.
• Zellweger, T.M., Kellermanns, F.W., Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: the importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organ. Sci. 23:3 (2012), 851–868.