On the use of bibliometric indicators for the analysis of emerging topics and their evolutionSpin-offs as a case study

  1. Gregorio González-Alcaide 1
  2. Juan Gorraiz 2
  3. José-Luis Hervás-Oliver 3
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 University of Vienna
    info

    University of Vienna

    Viena, Austria

    ROR https://ror.org/03prydq77

  3. 3 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01460j859

Show affiliations +
Journal:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Year of publication: 2018

Issue Title: Indicadores II / Libro electrónico

Volume: 27

Issue: 3

Pages: 493-510

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2018.MAY.04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: El profesional de la información

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Spin-offs are one of the most attractive areas of research; associated with the phenomena of entrepreneurship, innovation, and knowledge transfer. The present study shows that the selection and use of appropriate bibliometric indicators are a highly valuable method for studying emerging topics and analyzing the development and diffusion of the topic under research, including its process of emergence and growth. The primary aspects observed in relation to the development of university spin-off research includes the boom in the number of publications on the topic after a long period of latency and the pronounced multidisciplinary nature of the research. Our approach encompasses the evolution of scientific publication activity in the area, the scientific agents involved with it, and the cooperative practices and structural characteristics of the co-authorship network at different analytical levels. Also, this research explores cited literature, the evolution of key bibliometric indicators, and adds a validating qualitative analysis of content by an expert in the field. Moreover, the emergence of the topic is shown to overlap between seminal authors’ early research contributions to the topic and the time when they become investigators of reference in the field, with their work featured among the most highly cited documents. Last but not least, the age of the cited bibliography constitutes a prominent indicator for establishing the emerging nature of a topic as well as its stage of development.

€ View funding

Funding information

This work was supported by the Consellería de Educación, Investigación, Cultura y Deporte, Generalitat Valenciana (BEST 2016/153).

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Abramo, Giovanni; D’Angelo, Ciriaco-Andrea; Ferretti, Marco; Parmentola, Adele (2012). “An individual-level assessment of the relationship between spin-off activities and research performance in universities”. R&D management, v. 42, n. 3, pp. 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00680.x
  • Agarwal, Rajshree; Echambadi, Raj; Franco, April M.; Sarkar, Mitrabarun B. (2004). “Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival”. Academy of management journal, v. 47, n. 4, pp. 501-522. http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/ Knowledge_Xfer_Thru_Inheritance.pdf https://doi.org/10.5465/20159599
  • Anholt, Rae-Michele; Stephen, Craig; Copes, Ray (2012). “Strategies for collaboration in the interdisciplinary field of emerging zoonotic diseases”. Zoonoses and public health, v. 59, n. 4, pp. 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2011.01449.x
  • Berger, Philip G.; Ofek, Eli (1995). “Diversification’s effect on firm value”. Journal of financial economics, v. 37, n. 1, pp. 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)00798-6
  • Bontekoning, Yvonne M.; Macharis, Cathy; Trip, Jan J. (2004). “Is a new applied transportation research field emerging? A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature”. Transportation research part A: Policy and practice, v. 38, n. 1, pp. 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2003.06.001
  • Boyack, Kevin W.; Klavans, Richard (2010). “Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 12, pp. 2389-2404. https://goo.gl/Ygiev1 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419
  • Braam, Robert R.; Moed, Henk F.; Van-Raan, Anthony F. J. (1991). “Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 42, n. 4, pp. 233-251. http://www.dphu.org/uploads/attachements/books/ books_2134_0.pdf Chen, Chaomei; Hu, Zhigang; Liu, Shengbo; Tseng, Hung (2012). “Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace”. Expert opinion in biological therapy, v. 12, n. 5, pp. 593-608. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507
  • Chen, Kuan-Yu; Luesukprasert, Luesak; Chou, Seng-Cho T. (2007). “Hot topic extraction based on timeline analysis and multidimensional sentence modeling”. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, v. 19, n. 8, pp. 1016-1025. https://goo.gl/ucjyDJ https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2007.1040
  • Corley, Kevin G.; Gioia, Dennis A. (2004). “Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off”. Administrative science quarterly, v. 49, n. 2, pp. 173-208. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/4131471
  • Dahlstrand, Åsa-Lindholm (1997). “Entrepreneurial spin-off enterprises in Göteborg, Sweden”. European planning studies, v. 5, n. 5, pp. 659-673. https://goo.gl/Yvwuvw https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319708720424
  • Daley, Lane; Mehrotra, Vikas; Sivakumar, Ranjini (1997). “Corporate focus and value creation. Evidence from spinoffs”. Journal of financial economics, v. 45, n. 2, pp. 257-281. https://goo.gl/dj88JP https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00018-4
  • De-Nooy, Wouter; Mrvar, Andrej; Batagelj, Vladimir (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978 0 5211748 0 0 http://courses.arch.ntua.gr/fsr%2F144992/Pajek-Manual.pdf
  • Djokovic, Djordje; Souitaris, Vangelis (2008). “Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research”. The journal of technology transfer, v. 33, n. 3, pp. 225-247. https://goo.gl/CmD6e9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9000-4
  • Glänzel, Wolfgang (2012). “Bibliometric methods for detecting and analyzing emerging research topics”. El profesional de la información, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 194-201. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.11
  • Glänzel, Wolfgang; Thijs, Bart (2012). “Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labelling new emerging topics”. Scientometrics, v. 91, n. 2, pp. 399-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7
  • Goldman, Alyssa W. (2014). “Conceptualizing the interdisciplinary diffusion and evolution of emerging fields: The case of systems biology”. Journal of informetrics, v. 8, n. 1, pp. 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.009
  • González-Alcaide, Gregorio (2014). “Scientometric portrait of biochemist Santiago Grisolía: Publication productivity, collaboration patterns, and citation analysis”. Research evaluation, v. 23, n. 2, pp. 150-165. https://goo.gl/rVi3iy https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu003
  • González-Alcaide, Gregorio; Llorente, Pedro; Ramos, José-Manuel (2016). “Bibliometric indicators to identify emerging research fields: Publications on mass gatherings”. Scientometrics, v. 109, n. 2, pp. 1283-1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2083-2
  • Gordon, Avishag (2007). “Transient and continuant authors in a research field: the case of terrorism”. Scientometrics, v. 72, n. 2, pp. 213-224. https://goo.gl/6NhiAe https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1714-z
  • Harzing, Anne-Wil (2013). “Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the social sciences?”. Scientometrics, v. 94, n. 1, pp. 23-34. https://goo.gl/TRRGXg https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0738-1
  • Jarić, Ivan; Knezević-Jarić, Jelena; Lenhardt, Mirjana (2014). “Relative age of references as a tool to identify emerging research fields with an application to the field of ecology and environmental sciences”. Scientometrics, v. 100, n. 2, pp. 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1268-9
  • Jensen, Scott; Liu, Xiaozhong; Yu, Yingying; Milojevic, StaÅ¡a (2016). “Generation of topic evolution trees from heterogeneous bibliographic networks”. Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 606-621. http://daneshyari.com/article/preview/523377.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.002
  • Klepper, Steven; Sleeper, Sally (2005). “Entry by spinoffs”. Management science, v. 51, n. 8, pp. 1291-1306. https://goo.gl/R7TUEg https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0411
  • Klincewicz, Krzysztof (2016). “The emergent dynamics of a technological research topic: the case of graphene”. Scientometrics, v. 106, n. 1, pp. 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1780-6
  • Krishnaswami, Sudha; Subramaniam, Venkat (1999). “Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision”. Journal of financial economics, v. 53, n. 1, pp. 73-112. https://goo.gl/Q2oTLE https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00017-3
  • Liu, Chengliang; Gui, Qinchang (2016). “Mapping intellectual structures and dynamics of transport geography research: A scientometric overview from 1982-2014”. Scientometrics, v. 109, n. 1, pp. 159-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2045-8
  • Morris, Steven A. (2005). “Manifestation of emerging specialties in journal literature: A growth model of papers, references, exemplars, bibliographic coupling, cocitation, and clustering coefficient distribution”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 56, n. 12, pp. 1250-1273. https://goo.gl/VoxLpp https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20208
  • Mryglod, Olesya; Holovatch, Yurij; Kenna, Ralph; Berche, Bertrand (2016). “Quantifying the evolution of a scientific topic: Reaction of the academic community to the Chornobyl disaster”. Scientometrics, v. 106, n. 3, pp. 1151-1166. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05797 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1820-2
  • Mund, Carolin; Neuhäusler, Peter (2015). “Towards an early-stage identification of emerging topics in science: The usability of bibliometric characteristics”. Journal of informetrics, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 1018-1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.09.004
  • Mustar, Philippe; Renault, Marie; Colombo, Mssimo G.; Piva, Evila; Fontes, Margarida; Lockett, Andy; Wright, Mike; Clarysse, Bart; Moray, Nathalie (2006). “Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy”. Research policy, v. 35, n. 2, pp. 289-308. https://goo.gl/izxF7y https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.11.001
  • Nelson, Richard R.; Winter, Sidney G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978 0 6742722 8 6 https://goo.gl/52ouaJ
  • Penrose, Edith T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 1982897 7 7
  • Persson, Olle; Danell, Rickard; Schneider, Jesper-Wiborg (2009). “How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis”. In: Åström, Fredrik; Danell, Rickart; Larsen, Birger; Schneider, Jesper (eds.). Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday, pp. 9-24. Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. http://homepage.univie.ac.at/juan.gorraiz/bibexcel/ ollepersson60.pdf
  • Pirnay, Fabrice; Surlemont, Bernard; Nlemvo, Frédéric (2003). “Toward a typology of university spin-offs”. Small business economics, v. 21, n. 4, pp. 355-369. https://goo.gl/QqnAaj https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026167105153
  • Rafols, Ismael; Meyer, Martin (2010). “Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience”. Scientometrics, v. 82, n. 2, pp. 263-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
  • Rothaermel, Frank T.; Agung, Shanti D.; Jiang, Lin (2007). “University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature”. Industrial and corporate change, v. 16, n. 4, pp. 691-791. https://goo.gl/Gr7M6q https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm023
  • Rotolo, Daniele; Hicks Diana; Martin, Ben R. (2015). “What is an emerging technology?”. Research policy, v. 44, n. 10, pp. 1827-1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006
  • Schaltegger, Stefan; Gibassier, Delphine; Zvezdov, Dimitar (2013). “Is environmental management accounting a discipline? A bibliometric literature review”. Meditari accountancy research, v. 21, n. 1, pp. 4-31. https://goo.gl/m5TBXe https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2012-0039
  • Shapira, Philip; Kwon, Seokbeom; Youtie, Jan (2017). “Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology”. Scientometrics, v. 112, n. 3, pp. 1439-1469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2452-5
  • Small, Henry (1973). “Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 265-269. https://goo.gl/GBq5b8 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  • Small, Henry; Boyack, Kevin W.; Klavans, Richard (2014). “Identifying emerging topics in science and technology”. Research policy, v. 43, n. 8, pp. 1450-1467. http://daneshyari.com/article/preview/984558.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.005
  • Tseng, Yuen-Hsien; Lin, Yu-I; Lee, Yi-Yang; Hung, Wen-Chin; Lee, Chun-Hsiang (2009). “A comparison of methods for detecting hot topics”. Scientometrics, v. 81, n. 1, pp. 73-90. https://goo.gl/QxQVW1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-1885-x
  • Tu, Yi-Ning; Seng, Jia-Lang (2012). “Indices of novelty for emerging topic detection”. Information processing and management: An international journal, v. 48, n. 2, pp. 303-325. https://goo.gl/ghDgtX https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2011.07.006
  • Vadasz, Peter (ed.) (2008). Emerging topics in heat and mass transfer in porous media: From bioengineering and microelectronics to nanotechnology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ISBN: 978 1 4020 8178 1 https://goo.gl/JsWtLV
  • Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2011). “Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer”. ISSI Newsletter, v. 7, n. 3, pp. 50-54. https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2058
  • Wallin, Martin W. (2012). “The bibliometric structure of spin-off literature”. Innovation: Organization & management, v. 14, n. 2, pp. 162-177. https://goo.gl/wnYbyk https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2012.14.2.162
  • Wang, Qi (2018). “A bibliometric model for identifying emerging research topics”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 69, n. 2, pp. 290-304. https://goo.gl/MxNWu1 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23930
  • Willig, Andreas (2008). “Recent and emerging topics in wireless industrial communications: A selection”. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 102-124. https://goo.gl/sHHRsP https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2008.923194
  • Wright, Mike; Lockett, Andy; Clarysse, Bart; Binks, Martin (2006). “University spin-out companies and venture capital”. Research policy, v. 35, n. 4, pp. 481-501. http://isiarticles.com/bundles/Article/pre/pdf/51046.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005
  • Yi, Fengyun; Yang, Pin; Sheng, Huifeng (2016). “Tracing the scientific outputs in the field of Ebola research based on publications in the Web of Science”. BMC research notes, v. 9, pp. 221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2026-2
  • Zhang, Lin; Glänzel, Wolfgang; Ye, Fred Y. (2016). “The dynamic evolution of core documents: an experimental study based on h-related literature (2005-2013)”. Scientometrics, v. 106, n. 1, pp. 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1705-4
  • Zhang, Lin; Rousseau, Ronald; Glänzel, Wolfgang (2011). “Document-type country profiles”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 62, n. 7, pp. 1403-1411. https://goo.gl/7XidnP https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21537
Data source: Dialnet