Thresholds of change in children’s literatureThe symbol of the mirror

  1. Sergio Arlandis 1
  2. Agustín Reyes Torres 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Journal:
NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

ISSN: 2254-7339

Year of publication: 2018

Issue Title: Universities in the digital age: challenges and opportunities

Volume: 7

Issue: 2

Pages: 125-130

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7821/NAER.2018.7.275 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

Abstract

This article approaches the study of children’s literature as a threshold of change that allows readers to explore the reality around them, imagine other worlds and understand other perspectives. Based on the notion of the child’s cognitive development organized into four stages ―pre-reading, fantastic stage, fantastic-realistic stage and aesthetics stage― reading becomes a resource to combine fantasy and experience where the mirror is a highly suggestive element and prone to hundreds of interpretations and applications as can be seen in the plots of well-known books such as the brother Grimm’s Snow White, Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass, Michael Ende’s The Neverending story and J.K. Rowling’s The Philosopher’s Stone, among others. As a result, as young readers go from one stage to another, the mirror gains greater symbolic complexity and they face the discovery of the self and the other as well as the confrontation between the so-called primary and secondary worlds, reality and the marvelous.

Bibliographic References

  • Beck, I. L. (1998). Understanding Beginning Reading: A Journey Through Teaching and Research. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all (pp 11-31). London/ New York: Te Guilford Press.
  • Carroll, L. (2009). Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Casanueva, M. (2003). Relaciones entre Folklore y Literatura Infantil. Claves Interpretativas. Salamanca: Globalia Ediciones Anthema.
  • Chevalier, J. & Gheerbrant, A. (1997). Dictionary of Symbols. London: Penguin Books.
  • Cirlot, J. E. (2008). Diccionario de símbolos. Madrid: Siruela.
  • Colomer, T. (1999). Introducción a la literatura infantil y juvenil. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Connell, J. M (2000). Aesthetic Experiencies in the School Curriculum: Assessing the Value of Rosenblatt’s Transactional Theory. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34 (1), 27-35. doi:10.2307/3333652
  • Cuetos, F. (2005). Psicología de la lectura. Madrid: Cisspraxis.
  • Díaz Armas, J. (2006). Personajes de la literatura juvenil: cambio y maduración. In Personajes y temáticas en la Literatura Juvenil (PP. 73-98). Madrid: Aulas de Verano. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.
  • Eco, U. (2012). De los espejos y otros ensayos. Barcelona: Debolsillo.
  • Gargallo, B. (2000). Procedimientos. Estrategias de aprendizaje. Su naturaleza, enseñanza y evaluación. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • Gómez del Manzano, M. (1987). El protagonista-niño en la literatura infantil del siglo XX: incidencias en el desarrollo de la personalidad del niño lector. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Hunt, P. (2001). Children’s Literature. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Jack, S. (2004). Writing the Fantasy Film. Heroes and Journeys in Alternate Realities. New York: Michael Wiese Productions, Studio City.
  • Kucer, S. B. (2009). Dimensions of Literacy. A Conceptual Base for Teaching Reading and Writing in School Settings. London/New York: Routledge.
  • Lanes, S. (1972). Down the Rabbit Hole. Adventures and Misadventures in the Realm of Children’s Literature. New York: Atheneum.
  • Martos Núñez, E. (2011). Los entornos constructivistas de aprendizaje (ECA) y la educación literaria. Puertas a la lectura, 23, 4-13.
  • Matthews, R. (2002). Fantasy. The liberation of Imagination. Londres: Routledge.
  • Moreno, A. (1998). Literatura infantil. Introducción en su problemática, su historia y su didáctica. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz, Servicio de Publicaciones.
  • Nikolajeva, M. (1988). The Magic Code. The Use of Magical Patterns in Fantasy for Children. Estocolmo: Almquist & Wiksell International. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2010.481258
  • Nikolajeva, M. (2010). Literacy, Competence and Meaning-making: A Human Sciences Approach. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 145-159.
  • Petrini, E. (1958). Estudio crítico de la literatura infantil. Madrid: Rialp.
  • Propp, V. (1997). The Historical Roots of Fairy-tales. Bellingham: Western Washington University.
  • Reyes-Torres, A. (2014). Literacy Education: The First Step towards Literary Competence. En A. Reyes-Torres, L. Villacañas & B. Soler (Eds.), Thinking Through Children’s Literature in the Classroom (pp. 42-52). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
  • Rowling, J. K (1998). Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. New York: Scholastic Press.
  • Sánchez-Escalonilla, A. (2009). Fantasía de aventuras. Claves creativas en novela y cine. Madrid: Ariel.
  • Sipe, L. R. (2008). Storytime: Young Children’s Literary Understanding in the Classroom. New York: Routledge.
  • Sommer-Bodenburg, A. (2005). The Little Vampire. London: Andersen Press.
  • Todorov, T. (1973). The fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Tolkien, J. R. R. (1994). Sobre los cuentos de hadas. In Árbol y Hoja (pp. 13-100). Barcelona: Minotauro.
  • Vieiro, P. & Gómez, I. (2004). Psicología de la lectura. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
  • Vogler, Ch. (1992). The Writer’s Journey. Mythic Structure for Storytellers and Screenwriters. Michael Wiese Productions: Studio City.
  • Wyse, D., Andrews, R. & Hoffman J. (2010). The Routledge International Handbook of English, Language and Literacy Teaching. London/New York: Routledge.