Patrones y estrategias en la colaboración científicala percepción de los investigadores

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abad García, M. F.; González Teruel, A.; Sanz Casado, E.; Lascurain Sánchez M. L.; García Zorita, C. (2007). Producción científica de la Comunitat Valenciana en materias de biomedicina y ciencias de la salud a través de las bases de datos del Institute of Scientific Information (ISI). Valencia: Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria de Sanitat. PMid:17449048
• Aleixandre Benavent, R.; Alonso Arroyo, A.; González Alcaide G.; Giner Calatayud, F.; Bola-os Pizarro, M.; Navarro Molina, C.; Castelló Cogollos, L. (2011). Mapa científico en Salud Pública de la Comunitat Valenciana. Análisis de la productividad, colaboración e impacto de la investigación en Salud Pública en la Comunitat Valenciana (2005-2009). Valencia: Generalitat Valenciana, Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública.
• Alonso Arroyo, A.; Pulgarín, A.; Gil-Leiva, I. (2005). Estudio cienciométrico de la colaboración científica en la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, España. Information Research, 11 (1), paper 245.
• Alonso Arroyo, A.; Bola-os Pizarro, M.; González Alcaide, G.; Villamón, M.; Aleixandre Benavent, R. (2010). Análisis de género, productividad científica y colaboración de las profesoras universitarias de Ciencias de la Salud en la Comunidad Valenciana (2003-2007). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 33 (4), 624-642. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.4.764
• Amabile, T. M.; Patterson, C.; Mueller, J.; Wojcik, T.; Odomirok, P. W.; Marsh, M.; Kramer, S. J. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. The Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2), 418-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069464
• Babchuk, N.; Keith, B.; Peters, G. (1999). Collaboration in Sociology and other scientific disciplines: A comparative trend analysis of scholarship in the Social, Physical, and Mathematical Sciences. The American Sociologist, 30 (3), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-999-1007-5
• Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52 (3), 365-377. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014254214337
• Beaver, D.; Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1 (1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016840
• Bennett, L. M.; Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60 (5), 768-775. https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d PMid:22525233
• Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (14), 2226-2239. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20684
• Boardman, P. C.; Ponomariov, B. L. (2007). Reward systems and NSF university research centers: The impact of tenure on university scientists' valuation of applied and commercially relevant research. The Journal of Higher Education, 78 (1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11778963
• Bordons, M.; Sancho, R.; Morillo, F.; Gómez, I. (2010). Perfil de actividad científica de las universidades españolas en cuatro áreas temáticas: un enfoque multifactorial. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 33 (1), 9-33. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.1.718
• Bourdieu, P. (1976). Le champ scientifique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 2 (2), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1976.3454
• Bozeman, B.; Corley, E. (2004). Scientists´ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33 (4), 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
• Bozeman, B.; Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40 (10), 1393-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002
• Bozeman, B.; Fay, D.; Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38 (1), 1-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
• Brint, S. (2005). Creating the future: "new directions" in American research universities. Minerva, 43 (1), 23- 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-004-6620-4
• Cabezas-Clavijo, A.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.; Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2013). ¿Existe relación entre el tama-o del grupo de investigación y su rendimiento científico? Estudio de caso de una universidad española. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 36 (2), e006. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.2.984
• Ca-ibano, C.; Otamendi, J.; Solís, F. (2010). Investigación y movilidad internacional: análisis de las estancias en centros extranjeros de los investigadores andaluces. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 33 (3), 428-457. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.3.736
• Carretero Guerra, R.; Solís Cabrera, M.; Sánchez Malo, F. (coords.) (2005). Indicadores científicos de la producción andaluza en biomedicina y ciencias de la salud (ISI, Web of Science, 1990-2002). Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Salud.
• Cohen, J. E. (1991). Size, age and productivity of scientific and technical research groups. Scientometrics, 20 (3), 395-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019761
• Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (7), 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
• Croll, R. P. (1984). The noncontributing author: An issue of credit and responsibility. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 27 (3), 401-407. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1984.0053
• Cummings, J. N.; Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35 (5), 703-722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705055535
• De Filippo, D.; Marugán, S.; Sanz-Casado, E. (2014). Perfil de colaboración científica del sistema español de educación superior. Análisis de las publicaciones en Web of Science (2002-2011). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 37 (4), e067. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.4.1155
• Endersby, J. W. (1996). Collaborative research in the Social Sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly, 77 (2), 375-392.
• Finholt T. A.; Olson, G. M. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, 8 (1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00540.x
• Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (2016). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española 2005-2014. Madrid: FECYT (Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología).
• Gazni, A.; Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University's publications. Scientometrics, 87 (2), 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0343-8
• Gómez, I.; Bordons, M.; Morillo, F.; Moreno, L. (coords.) (2009). Indicadores de producción científica de la Comunidad de Madrid 2004-2008. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Documentales sobre Ciencia y Tecnología, Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
• Gómez, I.; Fernández, M. T.; Méndez, A. (1995). Collaboration patterns of Spanish scientific publications in different research areas and disciplines. Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 187- 196. Medford, N.J: Learned Information, Inc.
• González Alcaide, G.; Gómez Ferri, J. (2014). La colaboración científica: principales líneas de investigación y retos de futuro. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 37 (4), e062. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.4.1186
• González-Alcaide, G.; Park, J.; Huamaní, C.; Belinchón, I.; Ramos, J. M. (2015). Evolution of cooperation patterns in psoriasis research: Co-authorship network analysis of papers in Medline (1942–2013). PLoS ONE, 10 (12), e0144837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144837 PMid:26658481 PMCid:PMC4676628
• González Alcaide, G.; Valderrama Zurián, J. C.; Aleixandre Benavent, R. (2012). Análisis del proceso de internacionalización de la investigación española en ciencia y tecnología (1980-2007). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35 (1), 94-118. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.1.847
• Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
• Hara, N.; Solomon, P.; Kim, S. L.; Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (10), 952-965. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10291
• Heffner, A. G. (1979). Authorship Recognition of Subordinates in Collaborative Research, Social Studies of Science, 9 (3), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277900900305
• Hu Z.; Chen, C.; Liu, Z. (2014). How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists? Scientometrics, 101 (2), 1553-1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1323-6
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2016). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf.
• Jamsen, J.; Corley, K. (2007). E-Survey methodology. En: Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements, pp. 1-8. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-792-8.ch001
• Katz, J. S.; Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26 (1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
• Kraut, R. E.; Galegher, J.; Egido, C. (1988a). Relationships and tasks in scientific collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 3 (1), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0301_3
• Kraut, R. E.; Egido, C.; Galegher, J. (1988b). Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration, CSCW '88 Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, pp. 1-12
• Kyvik, S.; Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science Technology and Human Values, 21 (1), 54-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100103
• Leahey, E.; Reikowsky, R. C. (2008). Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology. Social Studies of Science, 38 (3), 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707086190
• Leahey, E. (2016). From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074219
• Lee, S.; Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35 (5), 673-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
• Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16 (12), 317-323.
• Merton, R. K. (1942). A Note on Science and Technology in a Democratic Order, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1 (1-2), 115-126
• Miguel Dasit, A.; Martí Bonmatí, L.; Sanfeliu, P.; Aleixandre, R.; Valderrama, J. C. (2005). Estructura jerárquica de la colaboración entre autores. Análisis de los artículos sobre diagnóstico por la imagen publicados por los servicios hospitalarios de Radiología de la Comunidad Valenciana (1994-2001). Revista Clínica Española, 205 (6), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1157/13076149
• Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29 (1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00031-1
• Melin, G.; Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36 (3), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129600
• Mosbah-Natanson, S.; Gingras, Y. (2013). The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009). Current Sociology, 62 (5), 626-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113498866
• Olmeda Gómez, C.; Lara-Navarra, P. (coords.) (2010). Indicadores Bibliométricos de la Actividad Científica de Catalu-a (Scopus 2003-2008); Scimago Research Group.
• Patel, N. (1973). Collaboration in the Professional Growth of American Sociology, Social Science Information, 12 (6), 77-92.
• Persson, O.; Glanzel, W.; Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60 (3), 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d
• Peters, M. A. (2006). The rise of global Science and the emerging political economy of international research collaborations. European Journal of Education, 41 (2), 225- 244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00257.x
• Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40 (3), 228-240. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165952
• Powell, W. W.; DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Price, D. J. S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Price, D.; Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21 (11), 1011-1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024051
• Rennie, D.; Flanagin, A. (1994). Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. Journal of the American Medical Association, 271 (6), 469-471. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510300075043
• Ruiz-Santos, C.; Mero-o-Cerdán, A. L. (2007). Utilidad de los congresos científicos en la difusión del conocimiento: percepción del investigador español en Economía de la Empresa. Técnica Administrativa, 6 (30).
• Roztocki, N. (2001). Using internet-based surveys for academic research: opportunities and problems. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) National Conference, pp. 290-295.
• Sanz Casado, E.; De Filippo, D.; García Zorita, C.; Efraín- García, P. (2011). Observatorio IUNE: una nueva herramienta para el seguimiento de la actividad investigadora del sistema universitario español. Bordón, 63 (2), 101-115.
• Shrum, W.; Chompalov, I.; Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, 31 (5), 681–730 https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031005002
• Shrum, W.; Genuth, J.; Chompalov, I. (2007). Structures of Scientific Collaboration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. PMid:17414562
• Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41 (1), 643-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
• Wagner, C. S.; Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in Science. Research Policy, 34 (10), 1608- 1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002
• Wagner-Döbler, R. (2001). Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration behaviour since 1800 - From a bibliometric point of view. Scientometrics, 52 (3), 503-517. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014208219788
• Whitley, R. (1985). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. New York: Clarendon.
• Wray, K. B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, 69 (1), 150-168. https://doi.org/10.1086/338946
• Wuchty, S.; Jones, B. F.; Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316 (5827), 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099 PMid:17431139
• Youtie, J.; Bozeman, B. (2014). Social dynamics of research collaboration: norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights. Scientometrics, 101 (2), 953-962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1391-7
• Zalewska-Kurek, K. (2016). Understanding researchers' strategic behaviour in knowledge production: a case of social science and nanotechnology researchers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20 (5), 1148- 1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2015-0444
• Zuckerman, H. A. (1968). Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74 (3), 276-291.