Instituciones y comercio internacionalel impacto de la corrupción

  1. Salvador Gil-Pareja 1
  2. Rafael Llorca-Vivero 1
  3. José Antonio Martínez-Serrano 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revue:
Cuadernos económicos de ICE

ISSN: 0210-2633 2340-9037

Année de publication: 2018

Titre de la publication: Sistema Nacional de Salud: retos y tareas pendientes tras la Gran Recesión

Número: 96

Pages: 199-213

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: Cuadernos económicos de ICE

Résumé

After the international economic crisis of 2007, the economic literature focusses to a greater extent on corruption as a phenomenon that could distort the proper functioning of the economic system. In this sense, there have been works that investigate the relationship between the degree of corruption of countries and the volume of their international trade, an area that had been little explored so far. Although the uncertainty of acting in a corrupt environment can affect international business, some practices could also act as a mechanism of deregulation facilitating trade flows. In fact, the studies carried out are not entirely conclusive in relation to the sign of the impact of corruption on trade. This paper presents the current state of the issue describing the methodology and the data sets used as well as the results of the most influential studies.

Références bibliographiques

  • ACEMOGLU, A. y VERDIER, T. (2000). «The choice between market failures and corruption». American Economic Review, 90, 194-211.
  • ACEMOGLU, A.; JOHNSON, S. y ROBINSON, J. A. (2001). «The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation». American Economic Review, 91, 1369-1401.
  • AGHION, P.; AKCIGIT, U.; CAGÈ, J. y KERR, W. R. (2015). «Taxation, Corruption, and Growth». Harvard Business School Working Paper 16-075.
  • AKBARIAN, R. y SHIRAZI, H. (2012). «The effect of corruption on trade volumes of seleted countries in the Middle East and Latin America (2002-2008)». Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 8. 29-46.
  • ANDERSON, J. E. (1979). «A theoretical foundation to the gravity equation». American Economic Review, 69, 106-116.
  • ANDERSON, J. y MARCOUILLER, D. (2002). «Insecurity and the pattern of trade: An empirical investigation». Reiew of Economics and Statistics, 84, 342-352.
  • ANDERSON, J. E. y VAN WINCOOP, E. (2003). «Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle». American Economic Review, 93,170-192.
  • BAIER, S. L. y BERSTRAND, J. H. (2007). «Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?». Journal of International Economics, 71. 72-95.
  • BANCO MUNDIAL (1997). «Helping countries combat corruption the role of the World Bank». Poverty Reduction and Economic Management. The World Bank, disponible en http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/anticorrupt/corruptn/corrptn.pdf.
  • BAKSI, S.; BOSE, P. y PANDEY, M. (2009). «The impact of liberalization on bureocratic corruption». Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 72, 214-224.
  • BERGSTRAND, J. H. (1985). «The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence». Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 474-481.
  • BERGSTRAND, J. H. (1989). «The generalised gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor proportions theory in international trade». Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 143-53.
  • DEARDOFF, A. V. (1998). «Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassic world?». En J. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • DE JONG, E. y BOGMANS, C. (2011). «Does corruption discourage international trade?». European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 385-398.
  • DREHER, A. y GASSEBNER, M. (2013). «Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry». Public Choice, 155, 413-432.
  • DREHER, A.; KOTSOGIANNIS, C. y McCORRISTON, S. (2007). «Corruption around the world: Evidence from a structural model». Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 443-466.
  • DUTT, P. y TRAÇA, D. (2010). «Corruption and bilateral trade flows: Extortion or Evasion?». Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 843-860.
  • EGGER, P. (2002). «An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials». The World Economy, 25, 297-312.
  • EGGER, P. y WINNER, H. (2005). «Evidence on corruption as an incentive for foreign direct investment». European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 932-952.
  • EVENETT, S. J. y KELLER, W. (2002). «On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation». Journal of Political Economy, 110, 281-316.
  • FMI (2016). «Corruption: Costs and mitigating strategies». IMF Staff Discussion Notes. Disponible en http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2016/sdn1605.pdf.
  • GIL-PAREJA, S.; LLORCA-VIVERO, R.; MARTÍNEZ-SERRANO, J.A. (2008a). «Trade effects of monetary agreements: Evidence for OECD countries». European Economic Review, 52, 733-755.
  • GIL-PAREJA, S.; LLORCA-VIVERO, R. y MARTÍNEZ-SERRANO, J. A. (2008b). «Assessing the enlargement and deepening of the European Union», The World Economy, 31, 1253-1272.
  • GIL-PAREJA, S.; LLORCA-VIVERO, R. y MARTÍNEZ-SERRANO, J. A. (2017). «Corruption and international trade: A comprehensive analysis with gravity». Working Papers in Applied Economics WPAE-2017-05, Departamento de Estructura Económica, Universitat de València.
  • HALL, R. y JONES, C. I. (1999). «Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker tan others?». Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83-116.
  • HELPMAN, E.; MELITZ, M. y RUBINSTEIN, Y. (2008). «Estimating trade flows: trade partners and trade volumes». Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 441-487.
  • HORSEWOOD, N. y VOICU, A. M. (2012). «Does corruption hinder trade for the new EU members». Economics, 6, 1-28.
  • KLEIN, M. W. y SHAMBAUGH, J. C. (2006). «Fixed exchange rates and trade». Journal of International Economics, 70, 359-383.
  • KNACK, S. y AZFAR, O. (2003). «Trade intensity, country size and corruption», Economics of Governance, 4, 1-18.
  • LALOUNTAS, D. A.; MANOLAS, G. A. y VAVOURAS, I. S. (2011). «Corruption, globalization and development: How are these three phenomena related?». Journal of Policy Modelling, 33, 636-648.
  • LEVCHENKO, A. (2007). «Institutional quality and international trade». Review of Economic Studies, 74, 791-819.
  • MASILA, J. W. y SIGUE, S. P. (2010). «Corruption and Internationa Trade: An empirical investigation of African countries». The World Economy, 33,129-146.
  • MAURO, P. (1995). «Corruption and growth». Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681-712.
  • MAURO, P. (1998). «Corruption and the composition of government expenditure». Journal of Public Economics, 69, 263-279.
  • PÖYHÖNEN, P. (1963). «A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries». Weltwirtschaftliches Arhiv., 90, 92-100.
  • POMFRET, R. y SOURDIN, P. (2010). «Why do trade costs vary?». Review of World Economics, 146, 709-730.
  • RODRICK, D.; SUBRAMANIAN, A. y TREBBI, F. (2004). «Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development». Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131-165.
  • SANTOS SILVA, J. M. C. y TENREYRO, S. (2006). «The log of gravity». The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641-658.
  • SANTOS SILVA, J. M. C. y TENREYRO, S. (2010). «On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimates in Poisson regression». Economics Letters, 107, 310-312.
  • TAVARES, S. C. (2007). «Do rapid political and trade liberalizations increase corruption?». European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 1053-1076.
  • THEDE, S y GUSTAFSON, N. (2009). «The multifaceted impact of corruption on international trade». International Trade Working Papers, Lund University.
  • TINBERGEN, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy. Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
  • WEI, S. (2000). «How taxing is corruption on international investors». Review of Economics and Statistics, 82: 1-11.
  • VORAVEERAVONG, P. (2013), «Corruption impacts on bilateral trade between ASEAN countries during 2006 to 2011: Gravity model approach». World Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 27-44.
  • ZELEKHA, Y. y SHARABI, E. (2012). «Corruptions, institutions and trade». Economics of Governance, 13, 169-192.