Simultaneous and delayed direct sinus lift versus conventional implantsretrospective study with 5-years minimum follow-up

  1. Javier Romero Millán 1
  2. Federico Hernández-Alfaro 2
  3. Miguel Peñarrocha Diago 3
  4. David Soto Penaloza 1
  5. David Peñarrocha Oltra 4
  6. María Peñarrocha Diago 5
  1. 1 Master in Oral Surgery and Implantology. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry. University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  2. 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
  3. 3 Professor and Chairman of Oral Surgery, Stomatology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  4. 4 Assistant Professor of Oral Surgery. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry. University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  5. 5 Full Professor of Oral Surgery. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry. University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa

ISSN: 1698-6946

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 23

Número: 6

Páginas: 15

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4317/MEDORAL.22612 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa

Resumen

To compare the radiological parameters and success of posterior maxillary direct sinus lift with simultaneous or delayed implant placement, or implant placement in native bone, after a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. A retrospective cohort study was carried out in a university clinic, selecting patients subjected to implant treatment in the posterior maxilla between the years 2005 and 2011. The patients were divided into three groups: 1) implants placed in native bone; 2) direct sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement; and 3) direct sinus lift with delayed implant placement. Bone crest level, bone loss, vertical bone gain, and implant success and survival after a minimum follow-up period of 5 years after prosthetic loading were analyzed. A total of 163 patients and 329 implants were included in the study. The mean duration of follow-up was 7.0 ± 1.9 years. Bone loss and implant success and survival were very similar in all three groups, with no significant differences among them. Graft reabsorption was greatest during the first 12 months, though graft stabilization was confirmed after 5 years of follow-up. Bone loss and percentage success and survival proved very similar for the implants placed in native bone and for sinus lift with simultaneous or delayed implant placement. The height of the graft material decreased mainly in the first 12 months, and continued until stabilization after 5 years, with no significant variations thereafter.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Razavi, R,Zena, RB,Khan, Z,Gould, . (1995). Anatomic site evaluation of edentulous maxillae for dental implant placement. J Prosthodont. 4. 90
  • Ulm, CW,Solar, P,Gsellmann, B,Matejka, M,Watzek, . (1995). The edentulous maxillary alveolar process in the region of the maxillary sinus. A study of physical dimension. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 24. 459
  • Misch, C. (1990). Density of bone: Effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing and progressive bone loading. Int J Oral Implantol. 6. 23-31
  • Wheeler, SL,Holmes, RE,Calhoun, C. (1996). Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 11. 26-34
  • Tatum, . (1986). Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 30. 207
  • Romero-Millán, J,Martorell-Calatayud, L,Pe-arrocha, M,García-Mira, . (2012). Indirect osteotome maxillary sinus floor elevation: an update. J Oral Implantol. 38. 799-804
  • Raghoebar, GM,Vissink, A,Reintsema, H,Batenburg, R. (1997). Bone grafting of the sinus floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of endosseous implants. Br J Oral Surg. 35. 119
  • Johansson, B,Wannfors, K,Ekenbäck, J,Smedberg, JI,Hirsch, . (1999). Implants and sinus-inlay bone grafts in a 1-stage procedure on severely atrophied maxillae: surgical aspects of a 3-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 14. 811
  • Galindo-Moreno, P,Fernández-Jiménez, A,Ávila-Ortiz, G,Silvestre, FJ,Hernández-Cortés, P,Wang, H. (2014). Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 25. 378
  • Schlegel, A,Hamel, J,Wichmann, M,Eitner, . (2008). Comparative clinical results after implant placement in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 23. 289
  • Zijderveld, SA,Schulten, EA,Aartman, IH,ten Bruggenkate, C. (2009). Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 20. 691-700
  • Tetsch, J,Tetsch, P,Lysek, D. (2010). Long-term results after lateral and osteotome technique sinus floor elevation: a retrospective analysis of 2190 implants over a time period of 15 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 21. 497-503
  • Sbordone, L,Toti, P,Menchini-Fabris, G,Sbordone, C,Guidetti, . (2009). Implant success in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24. 316
  • Wannfors, K,Johansson, B,Hallman, M,Strandkvist, . (2000). A prospective randomized study of 1- and 2-stage sinus inlay bone grafts: 1-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 15. 625
  • Boronat, A,Peñarrocha, M,Carrillo, C,Marti, . (2008). Marginal bone loss in dental implants subjected to early loading (6 to 8 weeks postplacement) with a retrospective shortterm follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 66. 246
  • Peñarrocha-Diago, M,Peñarrocha-Diago, M,Sanchez-Recio, C,Peñarrocha-Oltra, D,Romero-Millán, . (2012). Osteotomy in direct sinus lift. A comparative study of the rotary technique and ultrasound. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 17. 457
  • Albrektsson, T,Zarb, G,Worthington, P,Eriksson, A. (1986). The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1. 11-25
  • Rodoni, LR,Glauser, R,Feloutzis, A,Hämmerle, C. (2005). Implants in the posterior maxilla: a comparative clinical and radiologic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 20. 231
  • Pieri, F,Aldini, NN,Fini, M,Marchetti, C,Corinaldesi, . (2012). Immediate fixed implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla after bilateral sinus floor augmentation: a 12-month pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 14. 67-82
  • Becktor, JP,Isaksson, S,Sennerby, . (2007). Endosseous implants and bone augmentation in the partially dentate maxilla: an analysis of 17 patients with a follow-up of 29 to 101 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 22. 603
  • Rokn, A,Ghahroudi, AR,Hemati, S,Soolari, . (2011). Comparison of peri-implant bone loss and survival of maxillary intrasinus and extrasinus implants after 2 years. J Dent. 8. 130
  • Angelopoulos, C,Thomas, SL,Hechler, S,Parissis, N,Hlavacek, . (2008). Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 66. 2130
  • Harris, D,Buser, D,Dula, K,Grondahl, K,Haris, D,Jacobs, . (2002). E.A.O. Guidelines fo the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European association for osseointegration in trinity college Dublin. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 13. 566
  • Sánchez-Recio, C,Peñarrocha-Diago, M,Peñarrocha-Diago, M,Peñarrocha-Oltra, . (2010). Maxillary sinus lift performed using ultrasound. Evaluation of 21 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 15. 371
  • Sbordone, C,Toti, P,Ramaglia, L,Guidetti, F,Sbordone, L,Martuscelli, . (2014). A 5-year clinical and computerized tomographic implant follow-up in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 25. 1056
  • Hatano, N,Shimizu, Y,Ooya, . (2004). A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15. 339
  • Huynh-Ba, G,Friedberg, JR,Vogiatzi, D,Ioannidou, . (2008). Implant failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 273 consecutive implants. J Periodontol. 79. 2256
  • Uckan, S,Deniz, K,Dayangac, E,Araz, K,Ozdemir, B. (2010). Early implant survival in posterior maxilla with or without beta-tricalcium phosphate sinus floor graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 68. 1642
  • Barone, A,Orlando, B,Tonelli, P,Covani, . (2011). Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study. Journal of Periodontology. 82. 219
  • Sesma, N,Pannuti, C,Cardaropoli, . (2012). Retrospective clinical study of 988 dual acid-etched implants placed in grafted and native bone for single-tooth replacement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 27. 1243
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet