Validation of the Working Alliance Inventory–Observer Short Version with male intimate partner violence offenders

  1. Faraj A. Santirso 1
  2. Manuel Martín-Fernández 1
  3. Marisol Lila 1
  4. Enrique Gracia 1
  5. Elena Terreros 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revista:
International journal of clinical and health psychology

ISSN: 1697-2600

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 18

Número: 2

Páginas: 152-161

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJCHP.2018.02.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of clinical and health psychology

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Antecedentes/Objetivo La alianza terapéutica es clave para incrementar la motivación, adherencia al tratamiento y participación en los programas de intervención con maltratadores. El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar las propiedades psicométricas y estructura factorial del Working Alliance Inventory-Observer Short Version (WAI-O-S) con una muestra de hombres maltratadores. Método Se utilizó una muestra de 140 hombres condenados por violencia de género y derivados a un programa de intervención con maltratadores. El acuerdo inter-jueces y la fiabilidad se evaluaron mediante el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. La estructura latente se obtuvo con un análisis factorial confirmatorio Bayesiano. Las puntuaciones del WAI-O-S se correlacionaron con la conducta proterapéutica, estadio y motivación para el cambio para analizar la validez. Resultados El WAI-O-S mostró una fiabilidad adecuada. El análisis factorial confirmatorio dio lugar a dos factores de primer orden (Vínculo y Acuerdo), y un factor de segundo orden (Alianza terapéutica general). Los resultados obtenidos también avalan la validez del instrumento. Conclusiones Una medida observacional fiable y válida de la alianza terapéutica, proporciona una herramienta útil para superar las limitaciones de las medidas basadas en auto-informes que se utilizan con población de hombres maltratadores, tales como la deseabilidad social, la negación y el engaño.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PSI2011-25434 and PSI2010-21334), and was conducted in collaboration with Home Office Prison Administration (Instituciones Penitenciarias, Ministerio del Interior). Faraj A. Santirso was supported by the FPU Program of the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (grant number FPU15/00864). Manuel Martín-Fernández was supported by the FPI Program of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BES15/075576). Appendix

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alexander, P. C., Morris, E., Tracy, A., & Frye, A. (2010). Stages of change and the group treatment of batterers: A randomized clinical trial. Violence and Victims, 25, 571---587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.5.571
  • Ando, T. (2011). Predictive Bayesian model selection. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 31, 13---38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2011.10737798
  • Andrade-González, N., & Fernández-Liria, A. (2015). Spanish adaptation of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Psychometric properties of the patient and therapist forms (WAI-P and WAI-T). Anales de Psicología, 31, 524---533. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.2.177961
  • Andrusyna, T. P., Tang, T. Z., DeRubeis, R. J., & Luborsky, L. (2001). The factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory in cognitive-behavioral therapy. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 10, 173---178.
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis using Mplus: Technical implementation. Retrieved from: http://statmodel2.com/download/Bayes3.pdf.
  • Arias, E., Arce, R., & Vilariño, M. (2013). Batterer intervention programmes: A meta-analytic review of effectiveness. Psychosocial Intervention, 22, 153---160. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/in2013a18
  • Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A metaanalytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023---1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001
  • Begun, A. L., Murphy, C., Bolt, D., Weinstein, B., Strodthoff, T., Short, L., & Shelley, G. (2003). Characteristics of the Safe at Home instrument for assessing readiness to change intimate partner violence. Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 80---107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049731502238758
  • Boira, S., Carbajosa, P., & Méndez, R. (2016). Fear, conformity and silence. Intimate partner violence in rural areas of Ecuador. Psychosocial Intervention, 25, 9---17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2015.07.008
  • Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252---260.
  • Brown, P. D., & O’Leary, K. D. (2000). Therapeutic alliance: Predicting continuance and success in group treatment for spouse abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 340---345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.340
  • Busseri, M. A., & Tyler, J. D. (2003). Interchangeability of the Working Alliance Inventory and Working Alliance Inventory. Short Form. Psychological Assessment, 15, 193---197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.193
  • Carbajosa, P., Catalá-Miñana, A., Lila, M., & Gracia, E. (2017). Differences in treatment adherence, program completion, and recidivism among batterer subtypes. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9, 93---101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.04.001
  • Carbajosa, P., Catalá-Miñana, A., Lila, M., Gracia, E., & Boira, S. (2017). Responsive versus treatment-resistant perpetrators in batterer intervention programs: Personal characteristics and stages of change. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law., 24, 936---950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1347933
  • Catalá-Miñana, A., Lila, M., & Oliver, A. (2013). Consumo de alcohol en hombres penados por violencia contra la pareja: factores individuales y contextuales. Adicciones, 25, 19---28.
  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284---290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
  • Connors, G. J., DiClemente, C. C., Dermen, K. H., Kadden, R., Carroll, K. M., & Frone, M. R. (2000). Predicting the therapeutic alliance in alcoholism treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 139---149. http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2000.61.139
  • Crane, C. A., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2013). Evaluation of a singlesession brief motivational enhancement intervention for partner abusive men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 180---187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032178
  • Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., Horvath, A. O., Symonds, D., & Wampold, B. E. (2012). Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance-outcome relationship: A restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology, 32, 642---649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.07.002
  • DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, 14, 1---11.
  • Eckhardt, C. I., Murphy, C. M., Whitaker, D. J., Sprunger, J., Dykstra, R., & Woodard, K. (2013). The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 4, 196---231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.4.2.196
  • Falkenström, F., Hatcher, R. L., & Holmqvist, R. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the patient version of the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form Revised. Assessment, 22, 581---593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191114552472
  • Ferrer-Perez, V. A., Ferreiro-Basurto, V., Navarro-Guzmán, C., & Bosch-Fiol, E. (2016). Batterer intervention programs in Spain: The professionals’ perspective. Psychosocial Intervention, 25, 159---168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2016.06.001
  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2014). Bayesian data analysis (2) Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Gracia, E., Rodriguez, C. M., & Lila, M. (2015). Preliminary evaluation of an analog procedure to assess acceptability of intimate partner violence against women: The Partner Violence Acceptability Movie Task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1567. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01567
  • Hartley, D. E., & Strupp, H. H. (1983). The therapeutic alliance: Its relationship to outcome in brief psychotherapy. In J. Masling (Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytical theories (1) (pp. 1---38). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytical Press.
  • Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223---233. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
  • Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A metaanalysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139---149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139
  • Lee, S. Y., & Song, X. Y. (2004). Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 653---686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3904 4
  • Lila, M., Gracia, E., & Catalá-Miñana, A. (2017). More likely to dropout, but what if they don’t? Partner violence offenders with alcohol abuse problems completing batterer intervention programs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260517699952
  • Lila, M., Gracia, E., & Catalá-Miñana, A. (2018). Individualized Motivational Plans in batterer intervention programs: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000291
  • Lila, M., Gracia, E., Catalá-Miñana, A., Santirso, F. A., & RomeroMartínez, Á. (2016). Alcohol abuse in Latin American immigrants participating in intervention programs for abusers: The importance of adherence to treatment. Universitas Psychologica, 15, 1---16. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-4.caai
  • Lila, M., Gracia, E., & Murgui, S. (2013). Psychological adjustment and victim-blaming among intimate partner violence offenders: The role of social support and stressful life events. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 5, 147---153. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2013a4
  • Lila, M., Oliver, A., Catalá-Miñana, A., Galiana, L., & Gracia, E. (2014). The intimate partner violence responsibility attribution scale (IPVRAS). The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6, 29---36. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5093/ejpalc2014a4
  • Llor-Esteban, B., García-Jiménez, J. J., Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., & Godoy-Fernández, C. (2016). Profile of partner aggressors as a function of risk of recidivism. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16, 39---46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.05.004
  • López-Ossorio, J. J., Álvarez, J. L. G., Pascual, S. B., García, L. F., & Buela-Casal, G. (2017). Risk factors related to intimate partner violence police recidivism in Spain. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17, 107---119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.12.001
  • López-Ossorio, J. J., González-Álvarez, J. L., & Andrés-Pueyo, A. (2016). Predictive effectiveness of the police risk assessment in intimate partner violence. Psychosocial Intervention, 25, 1---7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2015.10.002
  • Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., Alexander, L., Margolis, M., & Cohen, M. (1983). Two helping alliance methods for predicting outcomes of psychotherapy. A counting signs vs. a global rating method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 171, 480---491.
  • Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, M. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438---450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.3. 438
  • Munder, T., Wilmers, F., Leonhart, R., Linster, H. W., & Barth, J. (2010). Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR): Psychometric properties in outpatients and inpatients. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17, 231---239, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.658.
  • Musser, P. H., Semiatin, J. N., Taft, C. T., & Murphy, C. M. (2008). Motivational interviewing as a pregroup intervention for partner-violent men. Violence and Victims, 23, 539---557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.5.539
  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313---335, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026802.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus User’s Guide. USA, Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 102---114. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102
  • Romero-Martínez, Á., Lila, M., & Moya-Albiol, L. (2016). Testosterone and attention deficits as possible mechanisms underlying impaired emotion recognition in intimate partner violence perpetrators. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8, 57---62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2016.01.001
  • Scott, K. L. (2004). Stage of change as a predictor of attrition among men in a batterer treatment program. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 37---47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B: JOFV.0000011581.01231.1e
  • Semiatin, J., Murphy, C., & Elliot, J. (2013). Observed behavior during group treatment for partner-violent men: Acceptance of responsibility and promotion of change. Psychology of Violence, 3, 126---139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029846
  • Strunk, D. R., Brotman, M. A., & DeRubeis, R. J. (2010). The process of change in cognitive therapy for depression: Predictors of early inter-session symptom gains. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 7, 599---606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.011
  • Taft, C. T., Murphy, C. M., Musser, P. H., & Remington, N. A. (2004). Personality, interpersonal, and motivational predictors of the working alliance in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 349---354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.349
  • Tichenor, V., & Hill, C. E. (1989). A comparison of six measures of working alliance. Psychotherapy, 26, 195---199, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085419.
  • Tracey, T., & Kokotovic, A. M. (1989). Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet