Aproximaciones Psicosociales a la CorrupciónUna Revisión Teórica

Bibliographic References

• Abbink, K. & Serra, D. (2012). Anticorruption policies: Lessons from the lab. Research in Expe-rimental Economics, 15, 77–115. doi: 10.1108/S0193-2306(2012)0000015006
• Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., & Renner, E. (2002). An experimental bribery game. Journal of Law, Econo-mics, and Organization, 18(2), 428–454. doi: 10.1093/jleo/18.2.428
• Andvig, J., Fjeldstad, O. H., Amundsen, I., Sissener, T., & Søreide, T. (2001). Corruption: A review of contemporary research. Bergen: CMI.
• Barkan, R., Ayal, S., Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The pot calling the kettle black: Distancing response to ethical dissonance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 757–773. doi: 10.1037/a0027588
• Benaissa, H. (1993). Corruption and the socio-cultural context. En M. Punch, E. Kolthoff, K. Van der Vijver, & B. Van Vliets (Eds.), Coping with corruption in a borderless world. Deventer: Kluwer.
• Boniolo, P. (2010). La trama de corrupción: un estudio en la clase media y la clase trabajadora de Buenos Aires. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 72(3), 365–391.
• Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A., & Bargh, J. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173–187. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173
• Cialdini, R., Reno, R., & Kallgren, C. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
• Diego, O. (2012). El problema de la corrupción en América Latina y la incorporación de la ética para su solución. Espacios Públicos, 15(35), 48–62.
• Djawadi, B. & Fahr, R. (2013). The impact of risk perception and risk attitudes on corrupt behavior: Evidence from a petty corruption experiment. izaDiscussion Paper Series. Recuperado de http://ftp.iza.org/dp7383.pdf
• Díaz, Á. (2003). Ética y corrupción. Lo público y la democracia. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 10(31), 141–151.
• Erat, S. & Gneezy, U. (2012). White lies. Management Science, 58, 723–733. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1449
• Fehr, E. & Falk, A. (2002). Psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Review, 46, 687–724. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00208-2
• Fiske, S. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
• Fox, R. (2011). The tribal imagination: Civilization and the savage mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. doi: 10.1257/089533005775196732
• Galinsky, A., Gruenfeld, D., & Magee, J. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
• Gino, F. & Bazerman, M. (2009). When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 708–719. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.013
• Gino, F. & Galinsky, A. (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.011
• Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and diffe-rentiation in unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x
• Greene, J. & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cognitive Science, 6, 517–523. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9
• Greene, J., Sommerville, R., Nystrom, L., Darley, J., & Cohen, J. (2001). An fmriinvestigation of emotio-nal engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108. doi: 10.1126/science.1062872
• Guerrero, M. & Rodríguez-Oreggia, E. (2008). On the individual decisions to commit corruption: A methodological complement. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65, 357–372. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.09.006
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
• Hall, J., Murphy, N., & Mast, M. (2006). Recall of nonverbal cues: Exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30(4), 141–155. doi: 10.1007/s10919-006-0013-3
• Harris, D., Herrmann, B., Kontoleon, A., & Newton, J. (2015). Is it a norm to favour your own group? Experimental Economics, 18(3), 491–521. doi: 10.1007/s10683-014-9417-9
• Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. doi: 10.2307/1914185
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251.
• Kallgren, C., Reno, R., & Cialdini, R. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulle-tin, 26(8), 1002–1012. doi: 10.1177/01461672002610009
• Keltner, D. & Lerner, J. (2010). Emotion. En S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001009
• Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
• López-López, W., Roa, D., Roa, M., Correa-Chica, A., Pérez-Durán, C., & Pineda-Marín, C. (2016). El rol de la filiación política en las creencias y discursos legitimadores de la corrupción. Psychosocial Inter-vention, 25(3), 179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.psi.2015.10.002
• López-López, W., Roa, M., Peralta, D., Pineda, C., & Mullet, E. (2016). Mapping Colombian citizens’ views regarding ordinary corruption: Threat, bribery, and the illicit sharing of confidential information. Social Indicators Research,1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1366-6
• Mazar, N. & Zhong, C. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21, 494–498. doi: 10.1177/0956797610363538
• Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633
• Mishra, A. (2006). Persistence of corruption: Some theoretical perspectives. World Development, 34(2), 349–358. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.03.010
• Monin, B. & Miller, D. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33
• Peer, E., Acquisti, A., & Shalvi, S. (2014). “I cheated, but only a little”: Partial confessions to unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 202–217. doi: 10.1037/a0035392
• Philp, M. & Dávid-Barrett, E. (2015). Realism about politi-cal corruption. Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 387–402. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-092012-134421
• Russell, A., & Fiske, S. (2010). Power and social perception. En A. Guinote & T. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power. New York: Guilford.
• Salgado, C. (2004). El flagelo de la corrupción: concep-tualizaciones teóricas y alternativas de solución. Liberabit. Revista de Psicología,(10), 27–40.
• Sandoval, I. (2016). Enfoque de la corrupción estructural: poder, impunidad y voz ciudadana. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 78(1), 119–152.
• Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., & Scheepers, D. (2012). The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 550–555. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.008
• Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., Scheepers, D., & Scholl, A. (2014). “Power corrupts” revisited: The role of construal of power as opportunity or responsibility. En J. van Prooijen & P. van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N., & Sassenberg, K. (2013). Power in group contexts: The influence of group status on promotion and prevention decision making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 238–254. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02063.x
• Schmid, M., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensiti-vity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 835–850. doi: 10.1037/a0016234
• Schweitzer, M. & Hsee, C. (2002). Stretching the truth: Elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25, 185–201.
• Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ayal, S. (2015). Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 125–130. doi: 10.1177/0963721414553264
• Smith-Crowe, K. & Warren, D. (2014). The Emotion-Evoked Collective Corruption Model: The role of emotion in the spread of corruption within organi-zations. Organization Science, 25(4), 1154–1171. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0896
• Sonenshein, S. (2009). Emergence of ethical issues during strategic change implementation. Organization Science, 20, 223–239. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0364
• Søreide, T. (2014). Drivers of corruption: A brief review. Washington: World Bank Group.
• Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. En S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Torelli, C. & Shavitt, S. (2010). Culture and concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 703–723. doi: 10.1037/a0019973
• Transparency International. (2009). The anti-corruption plain language guide.Recuperado de www.transpa-rency.org
• Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review, 91(4), 293–315.
• Vicuña, L., Hernández, H., Paredes, M., Rivera, J., Ríos, J., Santillana, C., & Torres, J. (2006). Percepción, tipos, y medidas de control de la corrupción, según el sexo, ciclo académico y la facultad a la que pertenecen los estudiantes universitarios. Revista iipsi, 9(2), 65–91.
• Wang, F. & Sun, X. (2016). Absolute power leads to absolute corruption? Impact of power on corruption depending on the concepts of power one holds. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 77-89. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2134
• Warren, D. & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Deciding what’s right: The role of external sanctions and embarrassment in shaping moral judgments in the workplace. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 81–105. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.004
• Welsh, D., Ordóñez, L., Snyder, D., & Christian, M. (2015). The slippery slope: How small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 114–127. doi: 10.1037/a0036950
• Zaloznaya, M. (2014). The social psychology of corruption: Why it does not exist and why it should. Sociology Compass, 8(2), 187–202. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12120
• Zhong, C., Magee, J., Maddux, W., & Galinsky, A. (2006). Power, culture, and action: Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in East Asian and Western societies. En E. Mannix, M. Neale, & Y. Chen (Eds.), Research on managing in teams and groups. Greenwich: Elsevier Science Press. doi: 10.1016/S1534-0856(06)09003-7