Barreras percibidas por los psicólogos profesionales españoles para una Práctica Basada en la Evidencia

Referencias bibliográficas

• Citas Aarons, G. (2005). Measuring provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice: consideration on an organizational context and individual differences. Child and Adolescent Clinics Psychiatrics of North America, 14, 255-258. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2004.04.008
• Aarons, G.A., MCDolnald, E., Sheehan, A.K., y Walrath-Greene,C.M. (2007). Confirmatory factor analysis of the evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS) in a geographically diverse sample of community mental health providers. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research,34, 465–469. doi: 10.1007/s10488-007-0127-x
• Aguinis, H., Werner, S., Abbott, J., Angert, C., Park, J.H., y Kohlhausen, D.(2010). Customer-Centric Science: Reporting significant research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 515-539. doi: 10.1177/1094428109333339
• American Psychological Association (2005). Policy Statement on Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology.Washington, DC: Author.American Psychological Association (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology: APA Presidential Task Force on evidence-based practice.
• American Psychologist, 61, 271–285. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271American Psychological Association (2010a). Ethical Principle of Psychologist and Code of Conduct.Washington, DC: Author
• American Psychological Association (2010b). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Babione, J.M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology: An ethical framework for graduate education, clinical training, and maintaining professional competence. Ethics & Behavior, 20, 443-453. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2010.521446
• Badenes-Ribera, L. (Junio, 2017). Barreras Percibidas hacia la Practica Basada en la Evidencia en psicólogos clínicos chilenos: un estudio piloto.Comunicación presentada al IV Congreso Internacional de Investigación en salud y envejecimiento. II Congreso Internacional de Investigación en salud, Murcia.
• Baicus, C., y Cariol, S. (2009). Leeter a Editor: Effect measure for quantiative endpoints: statistical versus clinical significance, or “how large the scale is?”. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 20, 124-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.10.002
• Bauer, R.M. (2007). Evidence-based practice in Psychology:implications for research and research training. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 685–694. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20374
• Bennett, S., Tooth, B., Mckenna, K., Rodger, S., Strong, J., ... Gibson, L. (2003). Perceptions of Evidence-Based Practice: A survey of Australian occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50, 13-22.
• Beyth-Maron, R., Fidler, F., y Cumming, G. (2008). Statistical cognition: Towards evidence-based practice in statistics and statistics education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7, 20-39.
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., y Rothstein, H.R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis.Chichester: Wiley.
• Botella, J.,y Sánchez-Meca, J. (2015). Meta-análisis en las ciencias sociales y de la salud.Madrid: Síntesis.
• Cerezo, M. (2002) Práctica clínica basada en la evidencia científica. Papel del gestor de información como integrante de un equipo multidisciplinar. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 12, 457-464.
• Chandler, J., Churchill, R., Higgins, J., Lasserson, T., y Tovey, T. (2013). Methodological standards for the conduct of new Cochrane intervention reviews (MECIR). Disponible en: http://editorial-unit.cochrane.org/mecir
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Copay, A.G., Subach, B.R., Glassman, S.D., Polly, D.W., y Schuler, T.C. (2007). Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. The Spine Journal, 7, 541-546. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008
• Cumming, G. (2014).The New Statistics: Why and How. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966
• Daset, L.R., y Cracco, C. (2013). Psicología Basada en la Evidencia: algunas cuestiones básicas y una aproximación a través de una revisión bibliográfica. Ciencias Psicológicas; 7, 209–220.
• Fetheny, J. (2010). Statistical and clinical significance, and how to use confidence intervals to help interpret both. Australian Critical Care, 23, 93-97. doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2010.03.001
• Gómez-Conesa, A. (2010). La práctica basada en la evidencia en el ámbito de la fisioterapia. Fisioterapia, 32, 49-50. doi:10.1016/j.ft.2010.01.001
• Grissom, R.J., y Kim, J.J. (2012). Effect sizes for research. New York, USA: Routledge
• Guerra, J.,Bagura, C., y Girabent, M. (2012). Adaptación al castellano y validación del cuestionario sobre práctica basada en la evidencia en fisioterapeutas. Fisioterapia, 34, 65-72. doi:10.1016/j.ft.2011.10.003
• Hutton, B., Catalá-López, F., y Moher, D. (2016). La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA. Medicina Clínica.doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02.025
• Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Caldwell, D. M., Chaimani, A., Schmid, C.H., Cameron, C.J.P, ... Moher D. (2015). The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Annals of Internal Medicine: Journal, 162,777-784. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385.
• Jacobsen, N.S., Follette,W.C., y Revenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance.Behavior Therapy, 15, 336-352. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(84)80002-7
• Jüni, P., Altman, D.G., y Egger, M. (2001). Assessing the quality of randomised controlled trials. En M. Egger, G.D. Smith y D.G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context(2ª ed.) (pp. 87-108). Londres: BMJ Books.
• Kalinowski, P., y Fidler, F. (2010). Interpreting significance: the differences between statistical significance, effect size, and practical importance. Newborn & Infant Nursing Reviews 10, 50–54. doi: 10.1053/j.nainr.2009.12.007
• Kazdin, A.E. (1999). The meanings and measurement of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 332-339. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.332
• Kazdin, A.E. (2001). Almost Clinically Significant (p<.10): Current measures may only approach clinical significance. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 8, 455-462. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.8.4.455
• Kazdin, A.E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146-159. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146 Kendall, P.C., Marrs-Garcia, A., Nath, S.R., y Sheldrick, R.C. (1999). Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 285–299. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.285
• Kicinski, M., Springate, D.A., y Evangelos Kontopantelis, E. (2015). Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Statistics in Medicine, 34, 2781-2795. doi: 10.1002/sim.6525
• Kirk, R.E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56,746–759. doi: 10.1177/0013164496056005002
• Kirk, R.E. (2001). Promoting good statistical practices: Some suggestions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 213-218. doi: 10.1177/00131640121971185
• Moher, D., Hopewell S., Schulz, K.F., Montori, V., Gøtzsche P.C., Devereaux, P.J., ... Altman, D.G. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. British Medical Journal,340, c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869
• Moher, D., Jones, A. y Lepage, L. for the CONSORT Group (2001). Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports for randomized trials: A comparative before-and-after evaluation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 1992-1995. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.1992
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzalaff, J., Altman, D.G., y the PRISMA group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
• Musselman, K.E. (2007). Clinical significance testing in rehabilitation research: what, why, and how? Physical Therapy Reviews, 12, 287-296. doi:10.1179/108331907X223128
• Nelson, T.D., y Steele, R.G. (2007). Predictors of practitioner self-reported use of evidence-based practices: Practitioner training, clinical setting, and attitudes toward research. Administration and Policy in Mental Healthand Mental Health Services Research, 34, 319–333.
• Nelson, T.D., Steele, R.G., y Mize, J.A. (2006). Practitioner attitudes toward Evidence-based Practice: Themes and challenges.Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33, 398–409.
• Newcombe, R.G. (2012). Confidence intervals for proportions and related mesuares of effect size. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
• Page, P. (2014). Beyond statistical significance: clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literatura.International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 9, 726–736.
• Pagoto, S.L., Spring, B., Coups, E.J., Mulvaney, S., Coutu, M., y Ozakinci, G. (2007). Barriers and facilitators of evidence-based practice perceived by behavioral science health professionals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 695–705. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20376
• Perestelo-Pérez, L. (2013). Standards on how to develop and report systematic reviews in Psychology and Health.International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13, 49-57.
• Sánchez-Meca, J., Boruch, R.F., Petrosino, A., y Rosa-Alcázar, A.I. (2002). La Colaboración Campbell y la Práctica basada en la Evidencia. Papeles del Psicólogo, 83, 44-48.
• Sánchez-Meca, J., y Botella, J. (2010). Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: herramientas para la práctica profesional. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 7-17.
• Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., y López-López, J.A. (2011). Meta-análisis e intervención psicosocial basada en la evidencia. Psychosocial Intervention, 20, 95-107.
• Schulz, R., O’Brien, A., Czaja, S., Ory, M., Norris, R., Martire, L.M., ... B Stevens, A., (2002). Dementia caregiver intervention research: in search of clinical significance.The Gerontologist, 42,589–602.
• Shea, B.J., Grimshaw, J.M, Wells, G.A., Boers, M., Andersson,N., Hamel, C., ... Bouter, L.M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 10-16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
• Spring, B. (2007). Evidence-based practice in clinical psychology: What it is, why it matters; what you need to know. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63,611-631. doi: 10.1002/jclip.20373
• Stroup, D.F., Berlin, J.A., Morton, S.C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G.D., Rennie, D., ... Thacker, S.B. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. A proposal for reporting. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283,2008-2012. doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
• Terwee, C.B., Roorda, L.D., Knol, D.K., De Boer, M.R., y De Vel, H.C.W. (2009). Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1062-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.011.
• Thompson, B. (2002). “Statistical,” “Practical,” and “Clinical”: How many kinds ofsignificance do counselors need to consider. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80, 64-71. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00167.x
• Turner, D., Schünemannb, H.J, Griffith, L.E., Beatone, D.E, Griffiths, A.M., Critch, J.N., y Guyatt, G.H. (2010). The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.024
• Urra-Medina, E., y Barría-Pailaquilén, R. (2010). Systematic review and its relationship with Evidence-Based Practice in health. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermería, 18(4), 824-831.
• Vázquez, C., y Nieto, M. (2003). Psicología (clínica) basada en la evidencia(PBE): una revisión conceptual y metodológica. En J.L. Romero (Ed).Psicópolis: Paradigmas actuales y alternativos en la psicología contemporánea. Barcelona. Paidós.
• Vera-Villarroel, P., y Mustaca, A. (2006). Investigaciones en psicología clínica basadas en la evidencia en Chile y Argentina. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38(3), 551-565.