¿Son los adhesivos dentinarios una opción válida para el tratamiento de la sensibilidad cervical dentinaria?

  1. Francisco José Gil-Loscos 1
  2. Francisco Alpiste-Illueca 1
  3. Agustín Pascual-Moscardó 1
  4. Angela Fygeroa-García 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Journal:
RCOE: Revista del Ilustre Consejo General de Colegios de Odontólogos y Estomatólogos de España

ISSN: 1138-123X

Year of publication: 2006

Volume: 11

Issue: 3

Pages: 281-290

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4321/S1138-123X2006000300001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: RCOE: Revista del Ilustre Consejo General de Colegios de Odontólogos y Estomatólogos de España

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the “in vitro” capability of fourteen agents proposed for the treatment of cervical dentin sensibility (CDS) to seal dentine tubules, to reduce dentine permeability and to resist the effect of wetness and tooth brushing. Materials and Methods: 140 dentin discs were obtained from freshly extracted human third molars. Samples were divided into fourteen groups of 10 each and were mounted in a perfusion device based on the Pashley´s system. Each disc was etched with 35% phosphoric acid. Permeability was measured after 1 hour, this value was considered the reference value (100%). One disc was used as a control and nine were treated with a bonding system. Permeability was measured again after 1 hour. One disc was used as a control and 8 were washed with water and subjected to simulated tooth brushing equivalent to three weeks of normal brushing. Subsequebtly, permeability was measured again. Results: All systems reduced dentinal perfusion when applied. Brushing of products produced an increase of permeability. The best results were obtained with Seal & Protect, follwed by Amm-i-dent + Xeno III, Clearfil SE Bond and Amm-i-dent+Scotchbond 1. Conclusions: All products have shown low resistance to washing and brushing. This can justify unsatisfactory clinical results in reducing dentinal sensibility. The best four products were all adhesives or a combination of these, it seems to indicate that adhesives are a good choice to be investigated and improved for the treatment of CDS.