The decision to acquire listed vs. Unlisted firmsDeterminants and value effects in the spanish stock market

  1. José E. Farinós 1
  2. Begoña Herrero 1
  3. Miguel A. Latorre 2
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
    info

    Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03d7a9c68

Revista:
Revista de economía aplicada

ISSN: 1133-455X

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 25

Número: 73

Páginas: 55-94

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de economía aplicada

Resumen

We examine the determinants of the decision to acquire a listed vs. an unlisted firm and extend the previous evidence of value creation after controlling for endogeneity due to self-selection bias. We also control for market valuation conditions, finding that results are conditional to them. On the one hand, our results show that investors see unlisted firm acquisitions as a value creation transaction in a bull market period, whereas we find value destruction in the acquisition of listed firms. During the bear market period we do not find value creation in any case. On the other hand, our results suggest that managerial opportunism is a determinant in the acquisition of listed firms, either in bull or bear market periods. However, under information asymmetry, acquirers change their preferences depending on the market conditions.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

We also thank the Cátedra Finanzas Internacionales-Banco Santander of the University of Valencia for their financial support.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akerlof, G.A. (1970): “The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 84, pp. 488-500.
  • Akhtar, F. (2015): “Conditional returns to shareholders of bidding firms: an Australian study”, Accounting and Finance. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12149.
  • Ang, J.S. and N. Kohers (2001): “The take-over market for privately held companies: The US experience”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 25, pp. 723-748.
  • Ang, J.S., R.A. Cole and J.W. Lin (2000): “Agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Finance, vol. 55, pp. 81-106.
  • Asquith, P., R.F. Bruner and D.W. Mullins, Jr. (1983): “The gains to bidding firms from merger”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 11, pp. 121-139.
  • Bae, S.C., K. Chand and D. Kim (2013): “Determinants of target selection and acquirer returns: Evidence from cross-border acquisitions”, International Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 27, pp. 552-565.
  • Balakrishna, S. and M.P. Koza (1993): “Information asymmetry, adverse selection, and joint ventures”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 20, pp. 99-117.
  • Becchetti, L. and G. Trovato (2002): “The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms: The role of the availability of external finance”, Small Business Economics, vol. 19, pp. 291-306.
  • Capron, L. and J. Shen (2007): “Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: Private information, target selection, and acquirer returns”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, pp. 891-911.
  • Chang, S. (1998): “Takeovers of privately held targets, methods of payment, and bidder returns”, Journal of Finance, vol. 53, pp. 773-784.
  • Comment, R. and G. Jarrell (1995): “Corporate focus and stock returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 37, pp. 67-87.
  • Conn, R., A.D. Cosh, P.M. Guest and A. Hughes (2005): “The impact on UK acquirers of domestic, crossborder, public and private acquisitions”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 32, pp. 815-870.
  • De Miguel, A., J. Pindado and B. Lozano (2003): “Un análisis de la creación de riqueza asociada a los fenómenos de tomas de control empresarial”, Análisis Financiero Internacional, No 113, pp. 51-65.
  • Draper, P. and K. Paudyal (2006): “Acquisitions: Private versus Public”, European Financial Management, vol. 12, pp. 57-80.
  • Faccio, M., J. McConnell and D. Stolin (2006): “Returns to acquirers of listed and unlisted targets”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 41, pp. 197-220.
  • Fama, E.F. and K.R. French (1993): “Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 33, pp. 3-56.
  • Farinós, J.E., B. Herrero and M.A. Latorre (2011): “Corporate entrepreneurship and acquisitions: creating firm wealth”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 7, pp. 325-339.
  • Farinós, J.E., C.J. García and A.M. Ibáñez (2005): “Insider trading and market behaviour around takeover announcements in the Spanish market”, Review of Financial Markets, vol. 7, pp. 31-53.
  • Feito-Ruiz, I., A.I. Fernández and S. Menéndez-Requejo (2014): “Determinants of acquisition of listed versus unlisted firms in different legal and institutional environments”, Applied Economics, vol. 46, pp. 2814-2832.
  • Fernández, A.I. and S. Gómez-Ansón (1999): “Un estudio de las oferta públicas de adquisición en el mercado de valores español”, Investigaciones Económicas, vol. 23, pp. 471-495.
  • Fernández, M. and C.J. García (1995): “El efecto de la Publicación de una OPA sobre la rentabilidad de las acciones”, Revista Española de Economía, vol. 12, pp. 219-240.
  • Fuller, K., J. Setter and M. Stegemoller (2002): “What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions”, Journal of Finance, vol. 57, pp. 1763-1793.
  • García, C.J. and M. Ferrando (1992): “Tomas de poder: Efectos sobre la rentabilidad de las acciones”, Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 1, 115-124.
  • Graebner, M.E. and K.M. Eisenhardt (2004): “The seller’s side of the story: acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 49, pp. 366-403.
  • Hansen, R.G. and J.R. Lott, Jr. (1996): “Externalities and corporate objectives in a world with diversified shareholder/consumers”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 31, pp. 43-68.
  • Healy, P., K. Palepu and R. Ruback (1997): “Which takeovers are profitable: Strategic or financial?”, Sloan Management Review, vol. 38, pp. 45-57.
  • Heckman, J.J. (1979): “Sample selection bias as a specification error”, Econometrica, vol. 47, pp. 153-161.
  • Jensen, M.C. (1986): “Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers”, American Economic Review, vol. 76, pp. 323-329.
  • Koepling, J., A. Sarin and A.C. Shapiro (2000): “The private company discount”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, vol. 12, pp. 94-101.
  • Kothari, S.P., S. Shu and P.D. Wysocki (2009): “Do managers withhold bad news?”, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 47, pp. 241-276.
  • Latorre, M.A., B. Herrero and J.E. Farinós (2014): “Do acquirers’ stock prices fully react to the acquisition announcement of listed versus unlisted target firms? Out-of-sample evidence from Spain”, Applied Economics Letters, vol. 21, pp. 1075-1078.
  • Lewis, K.K. (1999): “Trying to explain the home bias in equities and consumption”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 37, pp. 571-608.
  • Li, K. and N.R. Prabhala (2007): “Self-selection models in corporate finance”, in B. Espen Eckbo (Ed), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, Volume 1, North-Holland: Handbooks in Finance Series, Elsevier (Ch. 2).
  • Loughran, T. and J.R. Ritter (2004): “Why has IPO underpricing changed over time?”, Financial Management, vol. 33, pp. 5-37.
  • Martynova, M. and L. Renneboog (2008): “A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand?”, Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 32, pp. 2148-2177.
  • Martynova, M. and L. Renneboog (2011): “The performance of the European market for corporate control: Evidence from the fifth takeover wave”, European Financial Management, vol. 17, pp. 208-259.
  • Milgrom, P.R. (1987): “Auction theory”, in Advances in Economic Theory, Bewley, T.F. (Ed), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Mitchell, M.L. and E. Stafford (2000): “Managerial decisions and long-term stock price performance”, Journal of Business, vol. 73, pp. 287-329.
  • Moeller, S. and F. Schlingemann (2005): “Global diversification and bidder gains: a comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions”, Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 29, pp. 533-564.
  • Moeller, S., F. Schlingemann and R. Stulz (2004): “Firm size and the gains from acquisitions”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 73, pp. 201-228.
  • Moschieri, C. and J.M. Campa (2014): “New trends in mergers and acquisitions: Idiosyncrasies of the European market”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 67, pp. 1478-1485.
  • Myers, S.C. and N.S. Majluf (1984): “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 13, pp. 187-121.
  • Novaes, W. (2003): “Capital structure choice when managers are in control: Entrenchment versus efficiency”, Journal of Business, vol. 76, pp. 49-82.
  • Officer, M.S. (2007): “The price of corporate liquidity: Acquisition discounts for unlisted targets”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 83, pp. 571-598.
  • Officer, M.S., A.B. Poulsen and M. Stegemoller (2009): “Target firm information and acquirer returns”, Review of Finance, vol. 13, pp. 467-493.
  • Petmezas, D. (2009): “What drives acquisitions? Market valuations and bidder performance”, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, vol. 19, pp. 54-74.
  • Rani, N., S. Yadav and P. Jain (2012): “Impact of mergers and acquisitions on returns to shareholders of acquiring firms: Indian economy in perspective”, Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, vol. 25, pp. 1-24.
  • Reuer, J. and R. Ragozzino (2008): “Adverse selection and M&A design: the roles of alliances and IPOs”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 66, pp. 195-212.
  • Roll, R. (1986): “The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers”, Journal of Business, vol. 59, pp. 197-216.
  • Shams, S.M.M., A. Gunasekarage and S.R.N. Colombage (2013): “Does the organisational form of the target influence market reaction to acquisitions announcements? Australian evidence”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 24, pp. 89-108.
  • Shaver, J.M. (1998): “Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival?”, Management Science, vol. 44, pp. 571-585.
  • Shimizu, K., M.A. Hitt, D. Vaidyanath and V. Pisano (2004): “Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future”, Journal of International Management, vol. 10, pp. 307-353.
  • Shin, H. and R.M. Stulz (1998): “Are internal capital markets efficient?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, pp. 531-552.
  • Travlos, N.G. (1987): “Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment, and bidding firms’ stock returns”, Journal of Finance, vol. 42, pp. 943-964.
  • Varaiya, N. (1988): “The winner’s curse hypothesis and corporate takeovers,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol, 9, pp. 209-219.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet