La evaluación de la formación de formadoresun catalizador en el proceso de cambio curricular hacia la sostenibilidad

  1. Pilar Aznar Minguet 1
  2. M. Ángeles Ull 1
  3. Albert Piñero 1
  4. M. Pilar Martínez-Agut 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Journal:
Revista Iberoamericana de Educación

ISSN: 1681-5653,  1022-6508

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: Desarrollo sostenible y educación superior en un mundo global / Desenvolvimento sustentável e ensino superior num mundo global Coordinadora / Coordenadora: Belén Sáenz-Rico de Santiago

Volume: 73

Issue: 1

Pages: 225-252

Type: Article

DOI: 10.35362/RIE730300 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the inclusion of contents and activities related to sustainability in the training of trainers. The justification of this research is based on two basic assumptions: (a) interdisciplinary: our research group is composed of researchers from different academic areas that provide approaches and different academic cultures that facilitates the development of interdisciplinary dialogues from the logic of the disciplinary approaches . (b) of interaction “University / society”, “world academic / world employment”. The University must respond to the challenge that is faced by today’s society, as it is to prepare trainers competent to face their training functions from the perspective of sustainability. The study is in the field of research evaluation, assuming the methodological complementarity, combining the use of a quantitative approach, more appropriate to measure effects measurable, and end with the qualitative approach appropriate for the interpretation of the meanings and the obtaining of visions of reality more in depth to study. The instruments of analysis used have been the questionnaire and the interview in depth. The results allow to obtain a diagnosis on the inclusion of sustainability in the teaching of the teachers involved in the processes of training of trainers of the educational levels of early childhood education, primary education and secondary education at the University studied.

Bibliographic References

  • Aznar-Minguet, P., Martínez-Agut, M., Palacios, B., Piñero, A. & Ull, M. A. (2011). Introducing sustainability into university curricula: an indicator and baseline survey of the views of university teachers at the University of Valencia. Environmental Education Research, 17(2), 145- 166.
  • Aznar-Minguet, P. y Martínez-Agut, M. P. (2013). La perspectiva de la sostenibilidad en la sociedad del conocimiento interconectado: gobernanza, educación, ética. Revista de Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información (TESI), 14(3), 37-60.
  • Aznar Minguet, P. Ull Solís, M.A., Piñero, A. & Martínez-Agut, M. P. (2014a). Evaluación de la sostenibilidad en la docencia del profesorado universitario: construcción y validación de un cuestionario autodiagnóstico. Comunicación/Poster European Congress of Educational Research. ECER. Oporto. Septiembre.
  • Aznar Minguet, P., Ull Solís, M. A., Piñero, A. y Martínez-Agut, M. P. (2014b). Autodiagnóstico de la inclusión de la sostenibilidad en las actividades docentes del profesorado universitario. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia. Licencia creative commons by.nc-nd. OTRI (UV): 126721. Disponible en: http://www.uv.es/acuveg/.
  • Aznar Minguet, P., Ull, M. A., Martínez-Agut, M. P. y Piñero, A. (en prensa). Evaluar para transformar: evaluación de la docencia universitaria bajo el prisma de la sostenibilidad. Enseñanza de las Ciencias.
  • Barth, M. (2014). Implementing Sustainability in Higher Education. Learning in an age of transformation. London: Routledge. Publishers.
  • Blaze Corcoran, P.B. & Wals, A. E. J. (Eds) (2005). Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability: Problematics, Promise and Practice. Dordretch: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Chalkley, B. & Sterling, S. (2011). Hard Times in Higher Education: The Closure of Subject Centres and the Implications for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Sustainability, 3(4), 666-677;
  • De la Harpe, B, & Thomas, I. (2009). Curriculum Change in Universities: Conditions that Facilitate Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1, 75-85.
  • Fonseca, A., Macdonald, A., Dandy, E. & Valenti, P. (2011). The state of sustainability reporting at Canadian universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 22-44.
  • González-Gaudiano, E. J., Meira, P. A. & Martínez Fernández, C. N. (2015). Sustainability and the university: Challenges, rites, and posible routes. Revista de la Educación Superior (RESU), XLIV (3) (175), 69-93.
  • Holm, T., Sammalisto, K., Grindsted, T & Vuorisalo, T (2015). Process framework for identifying sustainability aspects in university curricula and integrating education for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 164-174.
  • Hung, H-L., Altschuld, J. W. & Lee, Y. (2008). Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31, 191–198
  • Lozano, R. (2011). The state of sustainability reporting in universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 12(1), 67-78.
  • Murga Menoyo, M. A. (2015). Competencias para el desarrollo sostenible: las capacidades, actitudes y valores meta de la educación en el marco de la Agenda global post-2015. Foro de Educación, 13(19), 55-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015013.019.004
  • Olsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really be Mixed. En M. Holborn, Development in Sociology (pp. 1-30). Causeway Press, Ormskirk, 2004.
  • ONU (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el desarrollo sostenible. A/69/L85.
  • Padilla, T., Moreno, E. y Vélez, E. (2002). La técnica Delphi en la evaluación de necesidades. Bordón Revista de Pedagogía, 54, 83-94.
  • Solís-Espallargas, C., y Valderrama-Hernández, R. (2015). La educación para la sostenibilidad en la formación de profesorado. ¿Qué estamos haciendo? Foro de Educación, 13(19), 165-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.019.008
  • Tilbury, D. (2011). Assessing ESD Experiences during the DESD: An Expert Review on Processes and Learning for ESD. París: UNESCO. Disponible en: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001914/191442e.pdf
  • UE4SD (2015). Kapitulčinová, D., Dlouhá, J., Ryan, A., Dlouhý, J., Barton, A., Mader, M., Tilbury, D., Mulà, I., Benayas, J., Alba, D., Mader, C., Michelsen, G. & Vintar Mally, K. (Editors). Leading Practice Publication: Professional development of university educators on Education for Sustainable Development in European countries. Prague: Charles University in Prague.
  • UNECE (2011). Strategy for Education for Sustainable development. ECE/CEP/AC13/2011/6.
  • UNECE (2013). Empowering educators for a sustainable future. Tools for policy and practice workshops on competences in education for sustainable development. ECE/CEP/AC.13/2013/4. GE.13-20120.
  • UNESCO (2014). Shaping the Future We Want. UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-14). Final Report. Disponible en: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002301/230171e.pdf
  • Vilches, A. y Gil Pérez, D. (2012). La Educación para la sostenibilidad en la universidad: el reto de la formación del profesorado. Profesorado: Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado, 16(2), 25-43.
Data source: Dialnet