Validating justice climate and peer justice in a real work setting

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, J.S., Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67 (1963), 422–436, 10.1037/h0040968.
• Adams, J.S., Inequity in social exchange. Berkowitz, L., (eds.) Advances in experimental social psychology, 1965, Academic Press, New York, 267–299.
• Ambrose, M.L., Arnaud, A., Distributive and procedural justice: Construct distinctiveness, construct interdependence, and overall justice. Greenberg, J., Colquitt, J., (eds.) The handbook of organizational justice, 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 59–84.
• Ambrose, M.L., Schminke, M., Examining Justice Climate: Issues of Fit, Simplicity, and Content. Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F.J., (eds.) Multi-Level Issues in Organizations and Time, 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK, 397–413.
• Ambrose, M.L., Schminke, M., The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2009), 491–500, 10.1037/a0013203.
• Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988), 411–423, 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
• Babin, B.J., Boles, J.S., Robin, D.P., Representing the perceived ethical work climate among marketing employees. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (2000), 345–358, 10.1177/0092070300283004.
• Bangwayo-Skeete, P.F., Rahim, A.H., Zikhali, P., What determines individuals’ preferences for efficiency over equity-based wages?. Journal of Economic Studies 40 (2013), 600–613, 10.1108/JES-10-2011-0126.
• Barr, A., Burns, J., Miller, L., & Shaw, I. (2011). Individual notions of distributive justice and relative economic status. (IFS Working Paper, 11/19).
• Bashshur, M., Rupp, D. E., & Christopher, J. (2004). Theoretically-based strategies for defining and measuring justice climate: Implications for multilevel research in organizational justice. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. New Orleans, LA.
• Bauer, T.N., Green, S.G., Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal 39 (1996), 1538–1567, 10.2307/257068.
• Bies, R.J., Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct?. Greenberg, J., Colquitt, J.A., (eds.) Handbook of organizational justice., 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, 85–112.
• Bies, R.J., Moag, J.F., Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Lewicki, R.J., Sheppard, B.H., Bazerman, M.H., (eds.) Research on negotiation in organizations, 1986, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 43–55.
• Birnbaum, M.H., Stegner, S.E., Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979), 48–74, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.48.
• Bliese, P.D., Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein, K.J., Kozlowski, S.W.J., (eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, 2000, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 349–381.
• Bliese, P.D., Multilevel random coefficient modeling in organizational research: Examples using SAS and S-PLUS. Drasgow, F., Schmitt, N., (eds.) Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis, 2002, Jossey-Bass, 401–445.
• Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) (2006, June 27). XII Convenio colectivo general de centros y servicios de atención a personas con discapacidad. BOE núm. 152 (11477), 24225-24245. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2006/06/27/pdfs/A24225-24245.pdf.
• Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (2002), 744–753, 10.1177/0146167202289004.
• Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R., Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S., (eds.) Testing structural equation models., 1993, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
• Buunk, B.P., Doosje, B.J., Jans, L.G.J.M., Hopstaken, L.E.M., Perceived reciprocity, social support, and stress at work: The role of exchange and communal orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993), 801–811, 10.1037//0022-3514.65.4.801.
• Cappelen, A., Hole, A., Sorensen, E., Tungodden, B., The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. American Economic Review 97 (2007), 818–827, 10.1257/aer.97.3.818.
• Chan, D., Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (1998), 234–246, 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234.
• Chen, F.F., Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling 14 (2007), 464–504.
• Cheung, G.W., Rensvold, R.B., Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling 9 (2002), 233–255, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
• Choi, J., Event justice perceptions and employees’ reactions: Perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008), 513–528, 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.513.
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., Aiken, L.S., Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2003, Erlbaum, Mahwah. NJ.
• Cohen-Charash, Y., Spector, P.E., The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 (2001), 278–321, 10.1006/obhd.2001.2958.
• Colella, A., Paetzold, R.L., Zardkoohi, A., Wesson, M.J., Exposing pay secrecy. Academy of Management Review 32 (2007), 55–71, 10.5465/AMR.2007.23463701.
• Colquitt, J.A., On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001), 386–400, 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.
• Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H., Ng, K.Y., Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001), 425–445, 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425.
• Colquitt, J.A., Noe, R.A., Jackson, C.L., Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology 55 (2002), 83–109, 10.1111/j. 1744-6570.2002.tb00104.x.
• Colquitt, J.A., Scott, B.A., Rodell, J.B., Long, D.M., Zapata, C.P., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal Of Applied Psychology 98 (2013), 199–236.
• Colquitt, J.A., Shaw, J.C., How should organizational justice be measured?. 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.
• Colquitt, J.A., Zapata-Phelan, C.P., Roberson, Q.M., Justice in teams: A review of fairness effects in collective contexts. Martocchio, J.J., (eds.) Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 24, 2005, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 53–94.
• Cropanzano, R., Li, A., Benson, L., Peer justice and teamwork process. Group & Organization Management 36 (2011), 567–596, 10.1177/1059601111414561.
• Cropanzano, R, Li, A., & James, K. (2007). Intraunit Justice and Interunit Justice and the People who Experience Them. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Multi-Level Issues in Organizations and Time (Research in Multi Level Issues (Vol. 6, pp. 415-437). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Dunlap, W.P., Burke, M.J., Smith-Crowe, K., Accurate tests of statistical significance for rWG and average deviation interrater agreement indexes. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003), 356–362, 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.356.
• Ehrhart, M.G., Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology 57 (2004), 61–94, 10.1111/j. 1744-6570.2004.tb02484.x.
• Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1981), 39–50.
• Gilson, L.L., Shalley, C.E., Blum, T.C., Team and organizational attitudes as a lens and mirror impacting customer satisfaction: An empirical test in self-managed teams. Journal of Quality Management 6 (2001), 235–256, 10.1016/S1084-8568(01)00039-6.
• González-Romá, V., Peiró, J. M., & Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 465-465-473. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.465.
• Greenberg, J., Setting the justice agenda: Seven unanswered questions about what, why and how. Journal of Vocational Behavior 58 (2001), 210–219, 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1792.
• Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., Hay, J., Equity and intimate relations: Recent research. Ickes, W., (eds.) Compatible and incompatible relationships, 1985, Springer, New York, 91–117, 10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_5.
• Hauenstein, N.M.A., McGonigle, T., Flinder, S.W., A meta-analysis of the relationship between procedural justice and distributive justice: Implications for justice research. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13, 2001, 39, 10.1023/A:1014482124497.
• Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., Norenzayan, A., The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:2–3 (2010), 61–83, 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
• Hofmann, D.A., Gavin, M.B., Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations. Journal of Management 24 (1998), 623–641.
• Holtz, B.C., Harold, C.M., Fair today, fair tomorrow? A longitudinal investigation of overall justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2009), 1185–1199, 10.1037/a0015900.
• Hrnexf.com Survey. (2001). Retrieved from www.hrnext.com/content.
• Hu, L., Bentler, P., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1999), 1–55, 10.1080/10705519909540118.
• James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., Wolf, G., Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (1984), 85–98, 10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85.
• Jones, D.A., Martens, M.L., The mediating role of overall fairness and the moderating role of trust certainty in justice-criteria relationships: The formation and use of fairness heuristics in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior 30 (2009), 1025–1051, 10.1002/job.577.
• Kidwell, R.E. Jr., Bennett, N., Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues research. Academy of Management Review 18 (1993), 429–456.
• Kim, K., The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 12 (2005), 368–390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_2.
• Kim, T., Leung, K., Forming and reacting to overall fairness: A cross-cultural comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104 (2007), 83–95, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.004.
• Kline, R.B., Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2011, Guilford press, New York. NY.
• Konow, J., Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. The American Economic Review 90 (2000), 1072–1091, 10.1257/aer.90.4.1072.
• Kozlowski, S.W., Klein, K.J., A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Klein, K.J., Kozlowski, S.W., (eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, 2000, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 3–90.
• Lavelle, J.J., Brockner, J., Konovsky, M.A., Price, K.H., Henley, A.B., Taneja, A., Vinekar, V., Commitment, procedural fairness, and organizational citizenship behavior: A multifoci analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 30 (2009), 337–357, 10.1002/job.518.
• Lavelle, J.J., Rupp, D.E., Brockner, J., Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management 33 (2007), 841–866, 10.1177/0149206307307635.
• LeBreton, J.M., Senter, J.L., Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods 11 (2008), 815–852, 10.1177/1094428106296642.
• Leung, K., Bond, M.H., The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (1984), 793–804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.793.
• Li, A., Cropanzano, R., Fairness at the group level: Justice climate and intraunit justice climate. Journal of Management 35 (2009), 564–599, 10.1177/0149206308330557.
• Li, A., Cropanzano, R., Bagger, J., Justice climate and peer justice climate: A closer look. Small Group Research 44 (2013), 563–592, 10.1177/1046496413498119.
• Liao, H., & Rupp, D. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 242-256. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242.
• Lind, E.A., Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. 2001, Stanford University Press, Stanford. CA.
• Lind, E.A., Van den Bos, K., When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior 24 (2002), 181–223, 10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24006-X.
• Lipponen, J., Wisse, B., Shared perceptions of perceived justice as a predictor of externally rated departmental level academic performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83 (2010), 1065–1074, 10.1348/096317909X479727.
• Mayer, D., Nishii, L., Schneider, B., Goldstein, H., The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences. Personnel Psychology 60 (2007), 929–963, 10.1111/j. 1744-6570.2007.00096.x.
• Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Wen, Z., In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural equation modeling 11 (2004), 320–341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.
• Meade, A.W., Johnson, E.C., Braddy, P.W., Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008), 568–592, 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568.
• Messick, D.M., Sentis, K.P., Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15 (1979), 418–434, 10.1016/0022-1031(79)90047-7.
• Moliner, C., Martínez-Tur, V., Peiró, J.M., Ramos, J., Cropanzano, R., Perceived reciprocity and well-being at work in non-professional employees: Fairness or self-interest?. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress 29 (2013), 31–39 doi: 10.1002/smi.2421.
• Morgeson, F.P., Hofmann, D.A., The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review 24 (1999), 249–265, 10.5465/AMR.1999.1893935.
• Mossholder, K.W., Bennett, N., Martin, C.L., A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19 (1998), 131–141, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199803)19:23.0.CO;2-P.
• Naumann, S.E., Bennett, N., A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal 43 (2000), 881–889, 10.2307/1556416.
• Peterson, R.A., On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (2001), 450–461, 10.1086/323732.
• Price, L.L., Arnould, E.J., Tierney, P., Going to extremes: Managing service encounters and assessing provider performance. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 1995, 83, 10.2307/1252075.
• Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2002, Sage, Newbury Park. CA.
• Roberson, Q.M., Justice in teams: The activation and role of sensemaking in the emergence of justice climates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100 (2006), 177–192, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.02.006.
• Roberson, Q.M., Justice in teams: The effects of interdependence and identification on referent choice and justice climate strength. Social Justice Research 19 (2006), 323–344, 10.1007/s11211-006-0010-z.
• Ross, M., Sicoly, F., Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1979, 322, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.322.
• Rupp, D.E., Paddock, E.L., From justice events to justice climate: A multi-level temporal model of information aggregation and judgment. Research on Managing Groups and Teams 13 (2010), 245–273, 10.1108/S1534-0856(2010)0000013012.
• Salancik, G.R., Pfeffer, J., A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (1978), 224–253, 10.2307/2392563.
• Shaw, J.D., Zhu, J., Duffy, M.K., Scott, K.L., Shih, H., Susanto, E., A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 96 (2011), 391–400, 10.1037/a0021340.
• Shipp, F., Burns, G.L., Desmul, C., Construct validity of ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, ODD toward adults, academic and social competence dimensions with teacher ratings of thai adolescents: Additional validity for the child and adolescent disruptive behavior inventory. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 32 (2010), 557–564, 10.1007/s10862-010-9185-6.
• Simons, T., & Roberson, Q. (2003). Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 432-432-443. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.432.
• Stouten, J., Kuppens, P., Decoster, S., Being angry for different reasons: The role of personality in distributive justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43 (2013), 795–805, 10.1111/jasp.12005.
• Thompson, L., Loewenstein, G., Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51 (1992), 176–197, 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90010-5.
• Törnblom, K.Y., Vermunt, R., An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Social Justice Research 12 (1999), 39–64, 10.1023/A:1023226307252.
• Tracey, J.B., Tews, M., Construct Validity of a General Training Climate Scale. Organizational Research Methods 8 (2005), 353–374, 10.1177/1094428105280055.
• Trachtman, R., The money taboo: Its effects in everyday life and in the practice of psychotherapy. Clinical Social Work Journal 27 (1999), 275–288, 10.1023/A:1022842303387.
• Walumbwa, F.O., Hartnell, C.A., Oke, A., Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology 95 (2010), 517–529, 10.1037/a0018867.
• Wayne, S.J., Liden, R.C., Sparrowe, R.T., Developing leader-member exchanges: The influence of gender and ingratiation. American Behavioral Scientist 37 (1994), 697–714, 10.1177/000276429403700508.
• Weiss, H.M., Cropanzano, R., Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. 1996, JAI Press, Greenwich. CT.
• Whitman, D.S., Caleo, S., Carpenter, N.C., Horner, M.T., Bernerth, J.B., Fairness at the collective level: A meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology 97 (2012), 776–791, 10.1037/a0028021.
• Widaman, K.F., Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement 9 (1985), 1–26, 10.1177/014662168500900101.
• Wit, F.R.C., Greer, L.L., Jehn, K.A., The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 97 (2012), 360–390, 10.1037/a0024844.
• World Health Organization. Atlas: Global resources for persons with intellectual disabilities. 2007, Author, Geneva.
• Zhang, Z., Jia, M., How can companies decrease the disruptive effects of stretch goals? the moderating role of interpersonal- and informational- justice climates. Human Relations 66 (2013), 993–1020, 10.1177/0018726713483630.