The sterilization of eco-criticismFrom sustainable development to green capitalism

  1. Santamarina Campos, Beatriz
  2. Vaccaro, Ismael
  3. Beltran Costa, Oriol
Zeitschrift:
Anduli: revista andaluza de ciencias sociales

ISSN: 1696-0270,  2340-4973

Datum der Publikation: 2015

Nummer: 14

Seiten: 13-28

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.12795/ANDULI.2015.I14.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Anduli: revista andaluza de ciencias sociales

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Development has been a dominant and highly visible trope of the global political and economic life of the world since the 1950s. As such it has been inevitably linked to some of the most important social processes of this era: colonialism, globalization, postcolonialism, global ecological crisis, the rise of environmentalism, and more. The consolidation of the contemporary consumer global society came, hand by hand, with the certainty that it sustained a way of life that as a collateral damage, included a global ecological crisis. From many quarters of the world new voices raised concerns about the costs of globalization and proposed alternatives and solutions: modern eco-criticism was born. This article analyzes the historical process of emergence of eco-critical concepts as well as on its appropriation, redefinition, and use by mainstream political and economic agents. Specifically we reflect on how �development� and �growth� under heavy criticism during the 70s were gradually transformed on �sustainable development� first, and, as the conversion was still raising significant disapproval, to �sustainability� later. The adoption of these new ideological frameworks to legitimize development allowed Western societies to dismiss more critical approaches such us �zero growth� or �de-growth

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Almenar, R.; E. Bono, and E. García (eds.). 1998. La sostenibilidad del desarrollo: el caso valenciano. Valencia: Universitat de València-Fundació Bancaixa.
  • Appadurai, A. 1986. ‘Introduction: commodities and the politics of value’. In The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (ed. Appadurai, A.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582
  • ATTAC (Association for the Taxation of Financial Transactions and Citizen’s Action). 2012. La Nature n’a pas de prix. Paris: Les Liens Qui Libèrent.Bernstein, S. 2002. ‘Liberal environmentalism and global environmental governance’. Global Environmental Politics, 2(3), 1-16.
  • Bernstein, S. 2012. ‘The compromise of liberal environmentalism’. Columbia University Press.
  • Bestard, J., and J. Contreras. 1987. Bárbaros, paganos, salvajes y primitivos. Una introducción a la Antropología. Barcelona: Barcanova.
  • Bohm, S.; M.C. Misoczky, and S. Moog. 2012. ‘Greening capitalism? A Marxist critique of carbon Markets’. Organization Studies 33(11): 1617–1638. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0170840612463326
  • Bookchin, M. 1962. Our synthetic environment. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Borowy, I. 2013. ‘Global health and development: conceptualizing health between economic growth and environmental sustainability’. Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences, 68(3), 451-485.
  • Bramwell, A. 1989. Ecology in the 20th century. London: Yale University Press.
  • Brundtland, G.; M. Khalid; S. Agnelli; S. Al-Athel; B. Chidzero; L. Fadika, and S. Okita. 1987. Our common future (‘Brundtland report).
  • Bumpus, A.G., and M. Liverman. 2011. ‘Carbon colonialism? Offsets, greenhouse gas reductions, and sustainable development’. In Peet, R., Robbins, P. and M. Watts. Global Political Ecology. London: Routledge.
  • Carson, R. [1962] 2002. Silent spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Castree, N. 2008. ‘Neoliberalising nature: Processes, effects, and evaluations’. Environment and Planning A 40: 153–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a39100
  • Comaroff, J., and J. Comaroff. 1991. Of revelation and revolution. Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226114477.001.0001
  • Commoner, B. [1963] 1972. The closing circle: confronting the environmental crisis. London: Cape.
  • D’Alisa, G.; F. Demaria, and G. Kallis (eds.). 2014. Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. London: Routledge.
  • Dalsgaard, S. 2013. ‘The commensurability of carbon: Making value and money of climate change’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3(1): 80–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.14318/ hau3.1.006
  • D’Eaubonne, F. 1978. Écologie, féminisme: révolution ou mutation? Paris: ATP.
  • Deléage, J. 1991. Historia de la ecología. Una ciencia del hombre y de la naturaleza. Barcelona: Icaria.
  • De Rivero, O. 2001. El mito del desarrollo: los países inviables en el siglo XXI. Lima: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • De Sousa Santos, B. 2011. Producir Para vivir: los caminos de la producción no capitalista. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Duban, F. 2000. L’écologisme aux États-Unis: historie et aspects contemporains de l’environnementalisme américain. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  • Dumont, R. 1973. L’utopie ou la mort. Paris: Seuil.
  • Dunlap, R., and A. Mertig (eds.). 1992. American environmentalism. The US environmental movement, 1970-1990. Washington, DC: Taylor& Francis.
  • Eckersley, R. 1992. Environmentalism and political theory. Toward an ecocentric approach. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Ehrlich, P. 1968. The population bomb. New York, NY: Ballantine.
  • Escobar, A. 1995. Encoutering development. The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Escobar, A. 1996. ‘Construction nature. Elements for a post-structuralist political ecology’. Futures 28(4): 325–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(96)00011-0
  • Galbraight, J.K. 1999. The affluent society. New York, NY: Penguin Book.
  • García, E. 1995. El trampolí fàustic. Alzira: Germanía.
  • Gard, G., and L. Gruen. 1993. ‘Ecofeminism. Toward global justice and planetary health’. Society and Nature 2(1): 1–35.
  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674281653
  • Giddens, A. 1995. ‘Affluence, poverty and the idea of a post-scarcity society’. UNRISD Discussion Papers 63.
  • Goldman, M. 2006. Imperial nature: the World Bank, and struggles for social justice in the age of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Igoe, J.; K. Neves, and D. Brockington. 2010. ‘A spectacular tour around the historic bloc: Theorizing the current convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion’. Antipode 42: 486–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00761.x
  • Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in forty-three societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Jacob, J. 1999. Histoire de l’écologie politique. Paris: Albin Michel.
  • Kapelus, P. 2002. ‘Mining, corporate social responsibility and the “community”: The case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi’. Journal of Business Ethics 39: 275–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016570929359
  • Latouche, S. 2004. Survivre au développement. De la décolonisation de l’imaginaire économique à la construction d’une société alternative. Paris: Mille et Une Nuits.
  • Latouche, S. 2008. La apuesta por el decrecimiento:¿ cómo salir del imaginario dominante? Barcelona: Icaria.
  • Latouche, S. 2009. Decrecimiento y posdesarrollo: el pensamiento creativo contra la economía del absurdo. Barcelona: El Viejo Topo.
  • Latouche, S. 2012. La sociedad de la abundancia frugal: Contrasentidos y controversias del decrecimiento. Barcelona: Icaria.
  • Latouche, S., and D. Harpagès. 2011. Le temps de la décroissance. Paris: Thierry Magnier.
  • Lélé, S.M. 1991. ‘Sustainable development: A critical review’. World Development, 19(6): 607–621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
  • Lemkow,L., and F. Buttel. 1983. Los movimientos ecologistas. Madrid: Mezquita.
  • Lohmann, L. 2010. ‘Uncertainty markets and carbon markets: Variations on Polanyian themes’. New Political Economy 15(2): 225–254. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/13563460903290946
  • MacDonald, K.I. 2010. ‘Business, biodiversity and new ‘fields’ of conservation: The world conservation congress and the renegotiation of organisational order’. Conservation & Society 8(4): 256–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.78144Macekura, S. (2015). Of Limits and Growth. Cambridge University Press.
  • Macekura, S. 2016. ‘Crisis and Opportunity: Environmental NGOs, Debt-for-Nature Swaps, and the Rise of’People-Centred’Conservation’. Environment and History, 22(1), 49-73.
  • Martinussen, J. 1997. Society, state and market. London: Zed Books
  • McGregor, A. 2010. ‘Green and REDD? Towards a political ecology of deforestation in Aceh, Indonesia’. Human Geography, 3: 21–34.
  • Meadows, D.H.; D.L. Meadows; J. Randers, and W.W. Behrens. 1972. The limits to growth. New York, NY: Universe Books.
  • Mesarovic, M., and E. Pestel. 1974. Mankind at the turning point: The second report to the Club of Rome. New York, NY: EP Dutton and Co.
  • Mitchell, R. 1992. ‘Twenty years of environmental mobilization: Trends among national environmental organizations’. In American Environmentalism. The U.S. Environmental Movement, 1970-1990 (ed. Dunlap, R., and A. Mertig). Washington, DC: Taylor& Francis.
  • Mora, C.; and P. Sale. 2011. ‘Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea’. Marine Ecology Progress Series 434: 251–266. http://dx.doi. org/10.3354/meps09214
  • Naredo, J.M. 1996. ‘Sobre el origen, el uso y el contenido del término sostenible’. Documentación Social, 102: 129–148.
  • Nazareth, L. 2007. The leisure economy: How changing demographics, economics, and generational attitudes will reshape our lives and our industries. Ontario: John Wiley and Sons.Redclift, M. 1987. Sustainable development. Exploring the contradictions. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203408889
  • Reich, C.A. 1970. The greening of America: How the youth revolution is trying to make America livable. New York, NY: Random House.
  • Riechmann, J., and F. Fernández Buey. 1994. Redes que dan libertad. Introducción a los nuevos movimientos sociales. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Sabin, P. 2013. The bet: Paul Ehrlich, Julian Simon, and our gamble over Earth’s future. Yale University Press.Sachs, W. 1991. ‘Environment and development: The story of a dangerous liaison’. The Ecologist 21(6).
  • Sachs, W. 2000. ‘Development. The rise and decline of an ideal’. Wuppertal Papers 108. http://www.wupperinst.org. Accessed on September 1, 2015.
  • Schumacher, E.F. [1973] 1985. Small is beautiful. Reinbeck: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
  • Seagle, C. 2012. ‘Inverting the impacts: mining, conservation and sustainability claims near the Rio Tinto/QMM ilmenite mine in Fort Dauphin, Southeast Madagascar’. Journal of Peasant Studies 39(2): 447–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.6717 69
  • Shiva, V. 1988. Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books.
  • Shiva, V. 1997. Biopiracy: The plunder of nature and knowledge. Boston, MA: South End Press.
  • Smith, N. 2008. Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  • Sosa, N. 2001. ‘A vueltas con la sustentabilidad, esta vez desde la ética’. Sistema. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 162-163: 53–72.
  • Stidsen, S. 2009. ‘Special Issue: REDD and indigenous peoples’. Indigenous Affairs International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs 1-2/09: 1–76.
  • Tinbergen, J. 1976. Reshaping the international order. New York, NY: E.P. Dutton.
  • Vincent, A. 1992. Modern political ideologies. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wallerstein, I. 1979. The capitalist world-economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Worster, D. (ed.) 1989. The ends of the Earth. Perspectives on modern environmental history. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139173599
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet