El posible conflicto entre los incentivos privados y públicos a innovar en una industria exportadora

  1. Francisco Caballero Sanz 1
  2. Pedro Mendi 2
  3. Rafael Moner-Colonques 3
  4. José J. Sempere-Monerris 3
  1. 1 Comisión Europea
  2. 2 Universidad de Navarra (ESP)
  3. 3 Universitat de València (ESP)
Zeitschrift:
Cuadernos económicos de ICE

ISSN: 0210-2633

Datum der Publikation: 2015

Titel der Ausgabe: Contribuciones a la economía de la innovación: análisis de la I+D+i empresarial

Nummer: 89

Seiten: 189-208

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.32796/CICE.2015.89.6100 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Cuadernos económicos de ICE

Zusammenfassung

This paper examines the existence of possible links between the incentives to innovate, social and private, and firm internationalization. Different competitive environments in domestic and foreign markets, together with either decreasing returns or constrained capacity, may generate unexpected effects with direct implications on policies that promote innovation and export activities. A process innovation increases firms’ profits but it can also reduce domestic consumer surplus. In particular, we identify conditions under which the private incentive to adopt a process innovation is larger than the social incentive, a finding that is in contrast with the received literature.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R. y Howitt, P. (2005). «Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship». The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701-728.
  • Aghion, P., Carlin, W. y Schaffer, M. (2002). Competition, Innovation and Growth in Transition: Exploring the Interactions between Policies. William Davidson Institute Working Paper.
  • Altomonte, C.,Aquilante, T., Bekes, G. y Ottaviano, G. (2013). «Internationalization and innovation of firms: evidence and policy».Economic Policy, 28(76), 663-700
  • Arrow, K. (1962). «Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions», en R. Nelson (ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
  • Aw, B. Y., Roberts, M. y Xu, D. (2011). «R&D investment, exporting, and productivity dynamics». American Economic Review, 101, 1312-1344.
  • Belleflamme, P. y Vergari, C. (2011). «Incentives to innovate in oligopolies». The Manchester School, 79(1), 6-28.
  • Bloomfield, M. J., Brüggemann, U., Christensen, H. B. y Leuz, C. (2015). «The Effect of Regulatory Harmonization on Cross-Border Labor Migration: Evidence from the Accounting Profession», 18 de enero 2015. Chicago Booth Research. Paper n. 15-03. Disponible en SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2551569 y en http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2551569
  • Bustos, P. (2011). «Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: Evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian firms». American Economic Review, 101, 304-340.
  • Caldera, A. (2010). «Innovation and Exporting: Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms». Review of World Economics, 146, 4, primavera.
  • Cassiman, B. y Veugelers, R. (2006). «In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition». Management Science, 52(1), 68-82.
  • Comisión Europea (2010). «Europa 2020. Una estrategia para el crecimiento inteligente,sostenible e incluyente». Comunicación de la Comisión. COM(2010) 2020 final, 3.3.2010, Bruselas, disponible en http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do? uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF
  • Comisión Europea (2014a). «Por un renacimiento industrial en Europa». Comunicación de la Comisión COM(2014) 14 final de 21.1.2014, Bruselas.
  • Comisión Europea (2014b). “Annual Report on European SMEs 2013/2014 – A Partial and Fragile Recovery». Anual Reporto n European SMEs, Bruselas, junio 2014.
  • Constantini, J. y Melitz, M. (2008). «The dynamics of firm-level adjustment to trade liberalization», en E. Helpman, D. Marin y T. Verdier (eds.), The organization of firms in a global economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Correa-López, M. y Doménech,R.(2012). «La internacionalización de empresas españolas», Documento de Trabajo, núm. 12/29, BBVA Research, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria BBVA.
  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J. y Yeaple, S. R. (2004). «Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms». The American Economic Review, 94(1), 300-316.
  • ICEX (2014). «Perfil de la Empresa Exportadora Española de Bienes». Informe recibido l 26/03/2015
  • Manjón, M., Máñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E. y SanchisLlopis, J. A. (2013). «Reconsidering Learning by Exporting». Review of World Economics, 149(1), 5-22.
  • Máñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E. y Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2014). «The Dynamic LinkagesAmong Exports, R&D and Productivity». The World Economy, 1-30.
  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). «The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity». Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
  • OECD (2013). «SME and Entrepreneurship Financing: The Role of Credit Guarantee Schemes and Mutual Guarantee Societies in Supporting Finance for Small and Mediumsized Enterprises». Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs and Local Development, Unclassified document, CFE/SME (2012)1/Final, January
  • OCDE (2014a). OECD Economic Surveys. Spain.
  • OCDE (2014b). Evaluation of Industrial Policy: Final Report. DSTI/IND(2014)3, Paris, March 2014.
  • Schumpeter, J. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London Unwin University Books.
  • Silva, A., Africano, A. P. y Afonso, O. (2010). «Learning-by-exporting: What We Know and What We Would Like to Know», FEP Working Paper 364, Porto: Universidade do Porto.
  • Spulber, D. (2013). «How do competitive pressures affect incentives to innovate when there is a market for inventions?». Journal of Political Economy, 121(6), 1007- 1054.
  • Vives, X. (2008). «Innovation and competitive pressure». The Journal of Industrial Economics, 56(3), 419-469.
  • Wagner, J. (2012). «International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006». Review of World Economics, 148(2), 235-267.