Factorial invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents from Spain and Portugal

  1. Francisco L. Atienza González 1
  2. Isabel Balaguer Solá 1
  3. Nuno Corte-Real 2
  4. António M. Fonseca 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Valencia (España)
  2. 2 CIFI2D, Sports Faculty, Porto University (Portugal)
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 28

Número: 3

Páginas: 353-358

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida es una de las escalas más utilizadas para medir el juicio cognitivo global sobre la propia satisfacción con la vida. Método: este estudio evalúa la equivalencia de la “SWLS” en adolescentes españoles y portugueses con Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio multi-muestra. Los participantes fueron alumnado español (N = 2.183) y portugués (N = 4.082) de Educación Secundaria. Resultados: los resultados proporcionan un elevado apoyo a la consistencia interna de las versiones en español y portugués de esta escala. Los resultados también mostraron que la estructura factorial y pesos factoriales podría considerarse invariable entre los grupos. Sin embargo, no se obtuvo la invariancia escalar completa entre las muestras de España y Portugal, con el intercepto para el ítem 5 variando entre los países. Conclusiones: otros estudios internacionales con esta escala han encontrado resultados similares. Se discuten las repercusiones de las conclusiones y se establece que las versiones en español y portugués de la “SWLS” pueden ser utilizadas para las comparaciones entre países con adolescentes españoles y portugueses.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alves, J. R., Corte-Real, N. J., Corredeira, R., Brustad, R., Balaguer, I., & Fonseca, A. M. (2004). Psychometrics properties and factorial invariance across gender of the Portuguese version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLSp). In The British Psychological Society (Eds.), Abstract book of the annual conference of British Psychological Society: Health psychology a positive perspective (pp. 52-53). Edinburgh: Queen Margaret University College.
  • Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1255-1260.
  • Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en adolescentes [Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale in adolescents]. Psicothema, 12(2), 314-319.
  • Casas, F., Sarriera, J. C., Abs, D., Coenders, G., Alfaro, J., Saforcada, E., & Tonon, G. (2012). Subjective indicators of personal well-being among adolescents. Performance and results for different scales in Latin-language speaking countries: A contribution to the international debate. Child Indicators Research, 5(1), 1-28.
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
  • Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. S., & Aarø, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway. Quality of Life Research, 20, 1307-1317.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
  • Dimitrova, R., & Domínguez, A. (2015). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Argentina, Mexico and Nicaragua. Social Inquiry into Well-being, 1, 32-39.
  • Figueiras, T., Santana, P., Corte-Real, N., Dias, C., Brustad, R., & Fonseca, A. M. (2010). Análise da estrutura factorial e da invariância da versão portuguesa da Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLSp) quando aplicada a adultos de ambos os sexos [Analysis of the factor structure and the invariance of the Portuguese version of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLSp) when applied to adults of both sexes]. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto, 10(3), 11-30.
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of crosscultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 147-157.
  • Hultell, D., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070-1079.
  • Jöresbog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
  • Little, T. D. (2000). On the comparability of constructs in cross-cultural research. A critique of Cheung and Rensvold. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 213-219.
  • Moksnes, U. K., Løhre, A., Byrn, D. G., & Haugan, G. (2014). Satisfaction with life scale in adolescents: Evaluation of factor structure and gender invariance in a Norwegian sample. Social Indicators Research, 118, 657-671.
  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fi t evaluation in structural equation modeling. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McCardle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics. A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275-340). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111-121.
  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137-152.
  • Ponizovsky, Y., Dimitrova, R., Schachner, M. K., & van de Schoot, R. (2013). The Satisfaction with Life Scale: Measurement invariance across immigrant groups. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(4), 526-532.
  • Pons, D., Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2000). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance for adolescents and elderly persons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 62-68.
  • Tucker, K. I., Ozer, D. J., Lyubomirsky, S., & Boehm, J. K. (2006). Testing for measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale: A comparison of Russians and North Americans. Social Indicators Research, 78, 341-360.
  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
  • Whisman, M. A., & Judd, C. M. (2016). A cross-national analysis of measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(2), 239-244.
  • Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.
  • Zanon, C., Bardagi, M. P., Layous, K., & Hutz, C. S. (2014). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale to Brazilians: Evidences of measurement noninvariance across Brazil and U.S. Social Indicators Research, 119, 443-453.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet