La eficacia de rol, la claridad de rol y el rendimiento en jóvenes futbolistas

  1. Fabra López, Priscila 1
  2. Castillo Fernández, Isabel 1
  3. Ródenas Cuenca, Luis 1
  4. Mercé Cervera, Juan 1
  5. Bray, Steven R. 2
  6. Balaguer Solá, Isabel 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 McMaster University
    info

    McMaster University

    Hamilton, Canadá

    ROR https://ror.org/02fa3aq29

Revista:
Revista de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1132-239X,  1988-5636

Año de publicación: 2015

Título del ejemplar: Revista de Psicología del Deporte

Volumen: 24

Número: 2

Páginas: 265-271

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología del deporte

Resumen

The aim of this study was twofold: 1) to analyze the relationship between role efficacy, role clarity, and role performance effectiveness as a subjective measure of performance, and 2) to examine role clarity as a moderator of the role efficacy-performance relationship, in both an offensive and defensive context in football. Two hundred and ninety-five male soccer players between 12 and 16 years old (M = 14.01, SD = 1.09) completed the questionnaires assessing the variables of the study. Results showed that the players who reported higher role clarity also reported higher role efficacy and performed better than those with lower role clarity. Also, role clarity was a moderator for defensive role functions; specifically, role efficacy was a positive predictor of performance only when role clarity was high.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ames, C. (1992a). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
  • Ames, C. (1992b). Achievement goals, motivational climate, and motivational processes. En G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 161-176). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Balaguer, I., Escartí, A. y Villamarín, F. (1995). Autoeficacia en el deporte y en la actividad física: estado actual de la investigación. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 48, 139-159.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Nueva York: Freeman.
  • Beauchamp, M. R. y Bray, S. R. (2001). Role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent teams. Small Group Research, 32, 133-157.
  • Beauchamp, M. R., Bray, S. R., Eys, M. A. y Carron, A. V. (2002). Role ambiguity, role efficacy and role performance effectiveness: multidimensional and mediational relationships within interdependent sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 229-242.
  • Bray, S. R. (1998). Role efficacy within interdependent teams: measurement development and tests of theory. (Tesis doctoral no publicada). University of Waterloo, Canadá.
  • Bray, S. R., Balaguer, I. y Duda, J. L. (2004). The relationship of task self-efficacy and role efficacy beliefs to role performance in Spanish youth soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 429-437.
  • Bray, S. R. y Brawley, L. R. (2002). Role efficacy, role clarity and role performance effectiveness. Small Group Research, 33, 233-253.
  • Bray, S. R., Brawley, L. R. y Carron, A. V. (2002). Efficacy for interdependent role functions: evidence from the sport domain. Small Group Research, 33, 644-666.
  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PE: Psychology Press.
  • Escartí, A. y Guzman, J. F. (1999). Effects of feedback on self-efficacy, performance, and choice in an athletic task. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 83-96.
  • Fabra, P., Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., Mercé, J. y Duda, J.L. (2013). La eficacia de rol como mediadora entre el clima motivacional y el rendimiento en jóvenes futbolistas. Revista de Psicología Social, 28, 47-58.
  • Feltz, D. L. y Lirgg, C. D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 557-564.
  • Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E. y Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-Efficacy in Sport: Research and strategies for working with athletes, teams, and coaches. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. y Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariante Data Analysis (6ª ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Heuzé, J. P., Raimbault, N. y Fontayne, P. (2006). Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 59-68.
  • Hodges, L. y Carron, A. V. (1992). Collective efficacy and group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 48-59.
  • Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D. y Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. Nueva York: John Wiley.
  • Katz, D. y Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organization (2ª ed.). Nueva York: John Wiley.
  • King, L. A. y King, D. W. (1990). Role conflict and role ambiguity: A critical assessment of construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 48-64.
  • Lázaro, I. y Villamarín, F. (1993). Capacidad predictiva de la autoeficacia individual y colectiva sobre el rendimiento en jugadores de baloncesto. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 4, 27-38.
  • Leo, F. M., García Calvo, T., Parejo, I., Sánchez, P. A. y Sánchez, D. (2010). Interacción de la cohesión en la eficacia percibida, las expectativas de éxito y el rendimiento en equipos de baloncesto. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 19, 89-102.
  • McClelland, G. H. y Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-376.
  • Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K. R. y Mack, D. E. (2000). The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 280-294.
  • Muñiz, J. y Hambleton, R. K. (2000). Adaptación de los tests de unas culturas a otras. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 129-149.
  • Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L. y Short, S. E. (2004). Collective efficacy and team performance: A longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 126-138.
  • Myers, N. D., Paiement, C. A. y Feltz, D. L. (2007). Regressing team performance on collective efficacy: Considerations of temporal proximity and concordance. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 11, 1-24.
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ortega, E., Olmedilla, A., Sainz de Baranda, P. y Gómez, M. A. (2009). Relationship between the level of self-efficacy, performance indicators, and participation in youth basketball. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 18, 337-342
  • Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J. y Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet