Elaboración de una versión reducida de las listas de frases en español (vr-LFE) para evaluar la percepción del habla con ruido

  1. Teresa Cervera
Revista:
Revista de logopedia, foniatría y audiología

ISSN: 0214-4603

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 34

Número: 1

Páginas: 32-39

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.RLFA.2013.07.007 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de logopedia, foniatría y audiología

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alameda J.R., Cuetos F. Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano 1995, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España.
  • Benichov J., Cox L.C., Tun P.A., Wingfield A. Word recognition within a linguistic context: Effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function. Ear and Hearing 2012, 33:250-256.
  • Carhart R. Basic principles of speech audiometry. Acta Otolaryngologica 1951, 40:62-71.
  • Cervera T., González Álvarez J. Lists of Spanish sentences with equivalent predictability, phonetic content, length, and frequency of the last word. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2010, 111:517-529.
  • Cervera T., González Álvarez J. Test of Spanish sentences to measure speech intelligibility in noise conditions. Behavior Research Methods 2011, 43:459-467.
  • Dubno J.R., Ahlstrom J.B., Horwitz A.R. Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 40:62-71.
  • Mayo L.H., Florentine M., Buus S. Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1997, 40:686-693.
  • Miller G.A., Nicely P. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1955, 27:338-352.
  • Navarro Tomás T. Escala de frecuencia de los fonemas españoles 1946, 15-30. Syracuse University.
  • Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N., Elliot L.L. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1977, 61:1337-1351.
  • Pérez H.E. Frecuencia de fonemas. Revista Electrónica en Tecnologías del Habla 2003, 1.
  • Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A., Daneman M. How young and old adults listen and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 97:593-608.
  • Shi L.F. Contribution of linguistic variables to bilingual listeners' perception of degraded English sentences. Journal of the Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2012, 55:219-234.
  • Van Wijngaarden S.J., Steeneken H.J., Hougast T. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002, 111(4):1906-1910.
  • Ward W.D. 'Sensitivity' versus 'acuity'. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1964, 50:294-295.
  • Wilson R.H., McArdle R. Speech signals used to evaluate functional status of the auditory system. Journal of the Rehabilitation, Research and Development 2005, 42:79-94.