Is R&D Enough to Take Advantage from External Knowledge? Focusing on Coordination Mechanisms

  1. García-Granero, Ana 1
  2. Vega-Jurado, Jaider 2
  3. Alegre-Vidal, Joaquin 3
  1. 1 INGENIO (CSIC-UPV)
  2. 2 Universidad del Norte - Business School Barranquilla-Colombia
  3. 3 Universitat de Valencia, Department of Business Management
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

ISSN: 0718-2724

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 9

Número: 2

Páginas: 118-130

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242014000200009 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

Resumen

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of research and development (R&D) and coordination mechanisms (such as decentralization in decision-making and formalization of organizational processes) in the transformation of external knowledge into innovation results. We use survey data for performing standard ordinary least squares regressions in a representative sample of firms from the Spanish Ceramic Tile Industry. The results suggest that R&D is an important moderator influencing the relationship between acquiring external knowledge and innovation outcomes. Second, formalization tends to have a detrimental effect in the transformation of external knowledge into innovation outputs. Third, there are differences if it is discriminated between exploratory and exploitative innovations. This study contributes to external knowledge sourcing research that insofar has only taken account of R&D, neglecting the role of coordination mechanisms, in the exploitation of this knowledge. Moreover, this study is relevant to organization theory. To date, this literature has focused on the direct effect of coordination mechanisms on innovation. We show that the latter can be contingent on external knowledge processes. Lastly, we add to both literature streams by showing the different nature of the results when considering exploratory or exploitative innovations.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahuja, G. (2000), “The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of inter-firm linkages”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 317–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::aid-smj90>3.3.co;2-2
  • Alegre, J. and Chiva, R. (2008), “Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test”, Technovation, Vol. 28, pp. 315-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.09.003
  • Alegre-Vidal, J., Lapiedra-Alcamı́, R. and Chiva-Gómez, R. (2004), “Linking operations strategy and product innovation: an empirical study of Spanish ceramic tile producers”, Research Policy, 33 No. 5, pp. 829-839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.003
  • Artés, J. (2009). “Long-run versus short-run decisions: R&D and market structure in Spanish firms”, Research Policy, Vol. 38, No.1, pp. 120-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.014
  • Ayuso, S., Rodríguez, M.Á., García-Castro, R. and Ariño, M.Á. (2011), “Does stakeholder engagement promote sustainable innovation orientation?”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 111 No. 9, pp.1399-1417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635571111182764
  • Baer, M. (2012). “Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55 No.5, pp.1102-1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0470
  • Baptista, R. and Swann, P. (1998), “Do firms in clusters innovate more?”, Research policy, Vol. 27, pp. 525–540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00065-1
  • Barge-Gil, A. and López. A. (2012), “R&D Determinants: accounting for the differences between research and development”, Munich Personal RePEC Archive, Munich, Germany.
  • Belderbos, R., Carree, M. and Lokshin, B. (2004), “Cooperative R&D and firm performance”, Research Policy, Vol. 33, pp. 1477–1492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
  • Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. (2002), “Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47 No.4, pp. 676-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3094913
  • Benner, M. and Tushman, M. (2003), “Exploitation, exploration and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, pp. 238-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
  • Bidault, F. and Cummings, T. (1994), “Innovating through alliances: expectations and limitations”, R&D Management, Vol. 24, pp. 33–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00845.x
  • Breschi, S. and Malerba, F. (1997), “Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamic and spatial boundaries”, Systems of innovation: technologies, institution and organizations, Pinter, London/Washington, pp. 130-156.
  • Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2006), “In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition”, Management Science, Vol. 52, pp. 68–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
  • Chang, Y. and Hughes, M. (2012), “Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms”, European Management Journal, Vol. 30, pp. 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.08.003
  • Chesbrough, H.W. (2003), Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989). “Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D”, The Economic Journal, pp. 569-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2233763
  • Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 128-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  • Colombo, M.G., Rabbiosi, L. and Reichstein, T. (2011), “Organizing for external knowledge sourcing”, European Management Review, Vol. 8, pp. 111–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01018.x
  • Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 555–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256406
  • Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. (2000), “A resource-based theory of strategic alliances”, Journal of Management, Vol.26, pp. 31 –61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600105
  • Foss, N., Laursen, K. and Pedersen, T. (2011), “Linking customer interaction and innovation: the mediating role of new organizational practices”, Organization Science, Vol. 22, pp. 980-999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0584
  • Galbraith, J.R. (1974), “Organization design: an information processing view”, Interfaces, Vol. 4, pp. 28-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.3.28
  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1984), “Structural inertia and organizational change”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 49, pp. 149-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095567
  • Hult, G.T., Hurley, R.F. and Knight, G.A. (2004), “Innovativeness: its antecedents and impact on business performance”, Industrial marketing management, Vol. 33, pp. 429–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015
  • Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A. and Volberda, H. W. (2005), “Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48 No.6, pp. 999-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573106
  • Jansen, J.J., Van den Bosch, F.A. and Volberda, H.W. (2006), “Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators”, Management Science, Vol. 52, pp. 1661-1674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
  • Keupp, M.M. and Gassmann, O. (2009), “Determinants and archetype users of open innovation”, R&D Management, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 331-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00563.x
  • Khandwalla, P.N. (1977), The design of organizations, Harcourt Brace Jovanovic, US.
  • Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1995), “On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities”, Research Policy, Vol. 24, pp. 185-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I
  • Lam, W. and Chua, A. Y. (2009), “Knowledge outsourcing: an alternative strategy for knowledge management”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13 No.3, pp. 28-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270910962851
  • Lane, P.J., Koka, B.R. and Pathak, S. (2006), “The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, pp. 833–863. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527456
  • Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2006), “Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 131-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  • Lin, B.W. and Wu, C.H. (2010), “How does knowledge depth moderate the performance of internal and external knowledge sourcing strategies?”, Technovation, Vol.30, pp. 582-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.07.001
  • Lopez, V. W. B. and Esteves, J. (2013), “Acquiring external knowledge to avoid wheel re-invention”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 17 No.1, pp. 87-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300787
  • Malerba, F. (2005), “Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 14, pp.63–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
  • March, J.G. (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, Vol. 2, pp. 71-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  • Martín-de Castro, G., López-Sáez, P. and Delgado-Verde, M. (2011), “Towards a knowledge-based view of firm innovation. Theory and empirical research”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 15 No.6, pp. 871-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179253
  • Menguc, B. and Auh, S. (2010), “Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: the role of organizational structure”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 39, pp. 820-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.08.004
  • Miotti, L. and Sachwald, F. (2003), “Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 1481–1499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
  • Morris, S. A., Greer, T. H., Hughes, C. and Clark, W. J. (2004), “Prediction of CASE adoption: a neural network approach”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 104, No.2, pp. 129-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570410522099
  • Muscio, A. (2007), “The impact of absorptive capacity on SMEs' collaboration”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 16, pp. 653-668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438590600983994
  • Nelson, R.R. (1991), “Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 61–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121006
  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., Kutner, M.H. and Li, W. (1996), Applied linear statistical models, Irwin.
  • OECD-Eurostat. (2005), Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, OECD, Paris.
  • Pérez-López, S. and Alegre, J. (2012), “Information technology competency, knowledge processes and firm performance”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 112, No.4, pp. 644-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635571211225521
  • Petruzzelli, A. M., Albino, V., and Carbonara, N. (2009), “External knowledge sources and proximity”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13 No.5, pp. 301-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270910988123
  • Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D. (1986), “Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects”, Journal of Management, Vol. 12, pp. 531–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
  • Rass, M., Dumbach, M., Danzinger, F., Bullinger, A.C. and Moeslein, K.M. (2013), “Open innovation and firm performance: the mediating role of social capital”, Creativity and innovation management, Vol. 22 (2), pp. 177-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12028
  • Rosenkopf, L. and Nerkar, A. (2001), “Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 287–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.160
  • Schmidt, T. (2010), “Absorptive capacity—one size fits all? A firm-level analysis of absorptive capacity for different kinds of knowledge”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 31, pp. 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mde.1423
  • Sofka, W. and Grimpe, C. (2010), “Specialized search and innovation performance – evidence across Europe”, R&D Management, Vol. 40, pp. 310-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00592.x
  • Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S. and Calantone, R. (2005), “Marketing and technology resource complementarity: an analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 259–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.450
  • Sorensen, J.B. and Stuart, T.E. (2000), “Aging, obsolescence and organizational innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, pp. 81–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666980
  • Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. G. and Ghandy, R. K. (2009), “Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73, No.1, pp. 3-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.3
  • Tsai, K.H. (2009), “Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: toward a contingency perspective”, Research Policy, Vol.38, pp. 765–778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.012
  • Tsai, K.H. and Wang, J.C. (2009), “External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: an analysis based on the Taiwanese technological innovation survey”, Research Policy, Vol. 38, pp. 518-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.007
  • Vega Jurado, J., Gutiérrez Gracia, A. and Fernández de Lucio, I. (2008a), “Analyzing the determinants of firm's absorptive capacity: beyond R&D”, R&D Management, Vol. 38, pp. 392 405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00525.x
  • Vega Jurado, J., Gutiérrez Gracia, A. and Fernández de Lucio, I. (2008b), “Cómo Innovan las empresas españolas? Una evidencia empírica”, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, Vol. 3 (3), pp. 100–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242008000100010
  • Wilhelm, S., Gueldenberg, S, and Guttel, W. (2013), “Do you know your valuable customers?”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.17 No.5, pp. 661-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jkm-12-2012-0385
  • Willem, A. and Buelens, M. (2009), “Knowledge sharing in inter-unit cooperative episodes: the impact of organizational structure dimensions”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 29, pp. 151–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.06.004
  • Zeng, S., Xie, X. and Tam, C. (2010), “Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs”, Technovation, Vol. 30, pp. 181-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003
  • Zhou, K.Z. and Li, C.B. (2012), “How knowledge affects radical innovation: knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 33, pp. 1090-1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.1959
  • Zhou, K.Z. and Wu, F. (2010), “Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 547–561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.830
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet