Efectos de las prácticas y métodos docentes sobre diferentes medidas del output educativoel caso de la universidad española

  1. Pérez Vázquez, Pedro José
  2. Vila Lladosa, Luis Eduardo
Revista:
Aula: Revista de Pedagogía de la Universidad de Salamanca

ISSN: 0214-3402

Año de publicación: 2013

Número: 19

Páginas: 95-110

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Aula: Revista de Pedagogía de la Universidad de Salamanca

Resumen

Este artículo analiza las relaciones existentes entre los recursos educativos aplicados durante la educación superior y dos tipos de medidas de los resultados generados: la nota media de los estudiantes y la contribución de la carrera al desarrollo de diversas competencias profesionales. Las relaciones hipotetizadas se modelan por medio de funciones de producción multinivel donde las variables dependientes son los resultados educativos alcanzados. Las variables explicativas utilizadas aproximan la prevalencia de diversos métodos de enseñanza y controlan tanto el comportamiento de los estudiantes durante los estudios como sus características individuales. Las estimaciones, realizadas con datos provenientes del proyecto europeo Reflex, evidencian la existencia de relaciones significativas entre los métodos de enseñanza y aprendizaje utilizados y las diversas medidas del output educativo consideradas. Los resultados muestran cómo la asistencia a clase es la práctica docente con mayor influencia en la nota media de la carrera; sin embargo, métodos docentes más proactivos como el aprendizaje basado en problemas, las prácticas de empresa y los conocimientos prácticos son más influyentes en cuanto al desarrollo de las competencias profesionales analizadas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ANGRIST, J. D. y LAVY, V. (2002) New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning. The Economic Journal, 112, 735-765.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00068
  • BARROW, L. y ROUSE, C. E. (2004) Using market valuation to assess the importance and efficiency of public school spending. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1747-1769.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00024-0
  • BEATTIE, K. y JAMES, R. (1997) Flexible coursework delivery to Australian postgraduates: how effective is the teaching and learning. Higher Education, 33, 177-194.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1002991406703
  • BELFIELD, C. R.; BULLOCK, A. D. y FIELDING, A. (1999) Graduates' view on the contribution of their higher education to their general development: a retrospective evaluation for the United Kingdom. Research in Higher Education, 40 (4), 409-438.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018736125097
  • BELFIELD, C. R. y FIELDING, A. (2001) Measuring the relationship between resources and outcomes in higher education in the UK. Economics of Education Review, 20, 589-602.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00037-6
  • Bryk, A. S. y Raudembush, S. W. (1992) Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • DE LEEUW, J. y KREFT, I. G. G. (1986) Random coefficient models for multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 57-85.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1164848
  • Dolton, P. y Makepeace, G. M. (1990) Graduate earnings after six years: who are the winners? Studies in Higher Education, 15 (1), 313-355.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079012331377581
  • DOLTON, P.; MARCENARO, O. D. y NAVARRO, L. (2003) The effective use of student time: a stochastic frontier production function case study. Economics of Education Review, 22, 547-560.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00027-X
  • HANUSHEK, E. A.; RIVKIN, S. G. y KAIN, J. F. (2005) Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
  • HARTOG, J. (2001) On human capital and individual capabilities. Review of Income and Wealth, 47 (4), 515-540.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-4991.00032
  • HOXBY, C. M. (2000) The effects of class size on student achievement: new evidence from population variation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1239-1285.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355300555060
  • Jacob, B. A. y Lefgren, L. (2004a) The impact of teacher training on student achievement: quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 50-79.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3559005
  • — (2004b) Remedial education and student achievement: a regression-discontinuity analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 226-244.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465304323023778
  • James, E.; Alsalam, N.; Conaty, J. C. y To, D. L. (1989) College quality and future earnings: where should you send your child to college? American Economic Review, 79 (2), 247-252.
  • KRUEGER, A. B. (2003) Economic considerations and class size. The Economic Journal, 113, F34-F63.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00098
  • Longford, N. T. (1993) Random coefficient models. Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
  • MENG, C. y HEIKE, H. (2005) Student time allocation, the learning environment, and the acquisition of competencies. ROA Research Memorandum ROA-RM2005/1E, Maastricht University.
  • MOULTON, B. R. (1989) Alternative Tests of the Error Components Model. Econometrica, 57 (3), 685-693.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1911059
  • — (1990) An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Units. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72 (2), 334-338.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2109724
  • Pescarella, E. T.; Smart, J. C. y Smylie, M. A. (1992) College tuition costs and early career socio-economic achievement: do you get what you pay for? Higher Education, 24 (3), 275-290.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00128447
  • PISCHKE, J. (2003) The impact of length of school year on student performance and earnings: evidence from the German short school years. National Bureau of Economic Research Working paper, n.º 9964.NBER.
  • PRITCHETT, L. y FILMER, D. (1999) What education production functions really show: A positive theory of education expenditure. Economics of Education Review, 18, 223-239.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(98)00034-X
  • ROUSE, C. E.; KRUEGER, A. B. y MARKMAN, L. (2004) Putting computerized instruction to the test: a randomized evaluation of a 'scientifically-based' reading program. Economics of Education Review, 23, 323-338.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.10.005
  • RYAN, M.; DELANEY, L. y HARMON, C. (2010) Micro-level determinants of lecture attendance and additional Study-Hours. UCD Centre for economic research Working paper series 10/25. Dublin, Irlanda: University College.
  • TODD, P. E. y WOLPIN, D. I. (2003) On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. The Economic Journal, 113, F3-F33.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00097
  • Vila, L. E.; Pérez, P. J. y Morillas, F. G. (2012) Higher education and the development of competencies for innovation in the workplace. Management Decision, 50 (9), 1634-1648.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741211266723
  • WORTHINGTON, A. C. (2001) An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics, 9 (3), 245-268.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09645290110086126
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet