Assessing the impact of agri-environmental schemes on the eco-efficiency of rain-fed agriculture

  1. Beltrán Esteve, Mercedes
  2. Gómez-Limón Rodríguez, José Antonio
  3. Picazo Tadeo, Andrés José
Revista:
Spanish journal of agricultural research

ISSN: 1695-971X,  2171-9292

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 10

Número: 4

Páginas: 911-926

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5424/SJAR/2012104-3088 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Spanish journal of agricultural research

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This paper analyses the impact of the Agri-environmental Extensification Scheme for the Protection of Flora and Fauna (F&F Scheme) on the eco-efficiency of a sample of dryland farms in the Spanish region of Castile and Leon. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the so-called program decomposition approach to efficiency measurement, we explore whether or not the production technology of the farms included in the F&F Scheme is more eco-efficient than the technology used by farms that are not included in the Scheme. The re-sults obtained confirm the foregoing hypothesis, providing evidence that environmental pres-sures could be reduced if all farms adopted the F&F Scheme technology. Furthermore, shad-ow prices are used to assess the monetary value of the potential reduction in environmental pressures that farms could achieve by adopting the F&F Scheme. The results show that the average opportunity cost of the decrease in environmental pressures (�55.65 ha-1) is similar to the compensation received by farms included in the F&F Scheme. Nevertheless, bearing in mind the great diversity of farms, we recommend agricultural policymakers to use an auction system to award such environmental contracts.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • References Alliance Environnement, 2007. Evaluation of the application of cross-compliance as foreseen under Regulation 1782/2003. Part I: Descriptive report. Institute for European Envi-ronmental Policy and Oréade-Brèche Sarl, London. Available in http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/cross_compliance/index_en.htm. [July 2011]. 
  • Arandia A, Aldanondo-Ochoa A, 2011. Pollution shadow prices in conventional and organic farming: an application in a Mediterranean context. Span J Agric Res 9(2): 363-376. 
  • Atance I, Barreiro-Hurlé J, 2006. CAP MTR versus environmentally targeted agricultural policy in marginal arable areas: impact analysis combining simulation and survey data. Agr Econ 34: 303-313.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0864.2006.00127.x 
  • Barreiro-Hurlé J, Martínez-Paz JM, Espinosa-Goded M, 2009. Conservación y eficiencia pro-ductiva: impacto de los programas agro-ambientales en la eficiencia de las explotacio-nes cerealistas de secano. ITEA 105(3): 184-201. 
  • Brockett PL, Golany B, 1996. Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 42: 466-472.http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.3.466 
  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2: 429-444.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 
  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E, 1981. Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Manage Sci 27: 668-697.http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.6.668 
  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K, 2007. Data envelopment analysis. A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software. Springer, New York. 
  • Cooper T, Hart K, Baldock D, 2009. The provision of public goods through agriculture in the European Union, Report Prepared for DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Con-tract No 30-CE-1233091/00-28. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Available in http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/public-goods/index_en.htm. [July 2011]. EC, 2005. Agri-environment measures: overview on general principles, types of measures, and application. European Commission -Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels. EC, 2006. Rural development in the European Union – Statistical and economic information, Report 2006. European Commission -Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels. 
  • Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S, 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecol Econ 65: 663-674.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 
  • Espinosa-Goded M, Barreiro-Hurlé J, Ruto E, 2010. What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach. J Agric Econ 61: 259-273.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00244.x 
  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Noh D, Weber WL, 2005. Characteristics of polluting technology. The-ory and practice. J Econometrics 126: 469-492.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.010 
  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Weber WL, 2006. Shadow prices and pollution costs in US agriculture. Ecol Econ 56: 89-103.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.022 
  • Gómez-Limón JA, Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Reig-Martínez E, 2012. Eco-efficiency assessment of olive farms in Andalusia. Land Use Policy 29(2): 395-406.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.004 
  • Grosskopf S, Valdmanis V, 1987. Measuring hospital performance. A non-parametric ap-proach. J Health Econ 6: 89-107.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-6296(87)90001-4 
  • Hansen JW, 1996. Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agr Syst 50: 117-143.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(95)00011-S 
  • Hodge I, 2000. Agri-environmental relationships and the choice of policy mechanism. World Econ 23: 257-273.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00271 
  • Huppes G, Ishikawa M, 2005. A framework for quantified eco-efficiency analysis. J Ind Ecol 9: 25-41.http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247882 
  • Kallas Z, Gómez-Limón JA, Arriaza M, 2007. Are citizens willing to pay for agricultural multifunctionality? Agr Econ 36: 405-419.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00216.x 
  • Kuosmanen T, Kortelainen M, 2005. Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envel-opment analysis. J Ind Ecol 9: 59-72.http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247846 
  • Latacz-Lohmann U, Van Der Hamsvoort C, 1997. Auctioning conservation contracts: a theo-retical analysis and an application. Am J Agric Econ 79: 407-418.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1244139 
  • Latacz-Lohmann U, Hodge I, 2003. European agri-environmental policy for the 21st century. Aust J Agr Resour Ec 47: 123-139.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00206 
  • Leleu H, Briec W, 2009. A DEA estimation of a lower bound for firms' allocative efficiency without information on price data. Int J Prod Econ 121: 203-211.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.05.002 
  • Lozano S, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G, 2009. The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts: A joint application of life cicle assessment and data en-velopment analysis. Sci Total Environ 407: 1744-1754.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.062PMid:19056104  
  • MAPA, 2004. Libro Blanco de la Agricultura y el Desarrollo Rural. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid. 
  • MARM, 2008. Evaluación final del programa de desarrollo rural para las medidas de acom-pañamiento en España, 2000-2006. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid. 
  • Mauchline A, Mortimer S, Park J, Finn J, Haysom K, Westbury D, Purvis G, Louwagie G, Northey G, Primdahl J et al., 2012. Environmental evaluation of agri-environment schemes using participatory approaches: Experiences of testing the agri-environmental footprint index. Land Use Policy 29(2): 317-328.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.002 
  • MEA, 2005. Ecosystems and well-being. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island 671 Press, Washington DC, USA. 
  • Misra D, Kant S, 2007. Shadow prices and input-oriented production efficiency analysis of the village-level production units of joint forest management (JFM) in India. Forest Policy Econ 9: 799-810.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.04.004 
  • O'Donnell C, Rao D, Battese G, 2008. Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Econ 34: 231-255.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0119-4 
  • Oñate JJ, Atance I, Bardají I, Llusia D, 2007. Modelling the effects of alternative CAP poli-cies for the Spanish high-mature value cereal-steppe farming systems. Agr Syst 94: 247-260.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.09.003 
  • Oude Lansink A, Silva E, 2004. Non-parametric production analysis of pesticides use in the Netherlands. J Prod Anal 21: 49-65.http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000012452.97645.30 
  • Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Reig-Martínez E, Gómez-Limón JA, 2011. Assessing farming eco-efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach. J Environ Manage 92: 1154-1164.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.025PMid:21193265  
  • Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Beltrán-Esteve M, Gómez-Limón JA, 2012. Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions. Eur J Oper Res 220: 798-809.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.025 
  • Reig-Martínez E, Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Hernández-Sancho F, 2001. The calculation of shadow prices for individual wastes using distance functions: An analysis for Spanish ceramic pavements firms. Int J Prod Econ 69: 277-285.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00018-9 
  • Schaltegger S, 1996. Corporate environmental accounting. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chich-ester, UK. 
  • Schilizzi S, Latacz-Lohmann U, 2007. Assessing the performance of conservation auctions: An experimental study. Land Econ 83(4): 497-515. 
  • Silva M, Thanassoulis E, 2001. Decomposing school and school type efficiencies. Eur J Oper Res 38: 357-373.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00157-0 
  • Windle J, Rolfe J, 2008. Exploring the efficiencies of using competitive tenders over fixed price grants to protect biodiversity in Australian rangelands. Land Use Policy 25: 388-398.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.09.005
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet