Effectiveness of comprehension monitoring strategies in EFL of nonbilingual spanish university students reading science texts

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alderson, J.C. 1984. Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In J.C. Alderson and A.H. Urquhart (eds.), Reading in a Foreign Language. 122–135. New York: Ablex.
• Alexander, P.A. and T.L. Jetton. 2000. Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson and R. Barr (eds.), Handbook of Reading Research: Vol. III. 285-310. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Auerbach, E.R. and D. Paxton. 1997. It's not the English thing: Bringing reading research into the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 31: 237-261.
• Baker, L. 1979. Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions. Journal of Reading Behavior 11: 363-374.
• Baker, L. 1985. How do we know when we don't understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D.L. Forrest-Pressley, G.E. Mackinnon and T.G. Waller (eds.), Metacognition. cognition and human performance. 155-205. New York: Academic Press.
• Baker, L. and R.I. Anderson. 1982. Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: evidence for comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly 17: 281-294.
• Baker, L. and A.L. Brown. 1984. Cognitive monitoring in reading comprehension. In Flood (ed.), Understanding reading comprehension. 21-44. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Benedetto, R.A. 1984: A psycholinguistic investigation of the use of top-level organizational strategies in first and second language reading: five case studies. New York University.
• Benedetto, R.A. 1985. Language ability and the use of top-level organization strategies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. Nº ED 266437.
• Bernhardt, E.B. and M.L. Kamil. 1995. Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypothesis. Applied Linguistics 16/1: 15–33.
• Block, E. 1986. The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly 20/3: 463-494.
• Block, E. 1992. See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly 26/2: 319-343.
• Brown, A., R. Bransford, R. Ferrara. and J. Campione. 1983. Learning, Remembering, and Understanding. In P. Mussen (ed), Handbook of Child Psychology: Cognitive development. 79-166. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Campanario, J.M. and J. Otero. 2000. Más allá de las ideas previas como dificultades de aprendizaje: las pautas de pensamiento. Las concepciones epistemológicas y las estrategias metacognitivas de los alumnos de ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 18: 155-169.
• Carrell, P.L. 1991. Second language reading: Reading ability or reading proficiency? Applied Linguistics 12: 159-179.
• Carrell, P., B. Pharis and J. Liberto. 1989. Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly 23/4: 647-678.
• Casanave, C. 1988. Comprehension monitoring in ESL reading: a neglected essential. TESOL Quarterly 22: 283-302.
• Clarke, M.A. 1979. Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning 29: 121-150.
• Clarke, M.A. 1980. The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal 64/2: 203–209.
• Council of Europe. 2001: Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning. Teaching. Assessment. Cambridge (U.K.): Cambridge University Press.
• Cummins, J. 1979. Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research 49: 222-251.
• Cziko, G.A. 1978. Differences in firstand second-language reading: the use of syntactic, semantic and discourse constraints. The Canadian Modern Review 34: 473-489.
• Esling, J. and J. Downing. 1986. What do ESL students need to learn about reading? TESL Canada Journal. Special Issue 1: 55-68.
• Flavell, J.H. 1981. Cognitive monitoring. In W.P. Dickson (ed.), Children's oral communication skills. 35-60. New York: Academic Press.
• Flesch, R. 1948. A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Linguistics 32: 221-223. Flesch-Kincaid Readability Scale. 2010. [Available at: http://www.readabilityformulas.com] Fukkink, R.G., J. Hulstijn and A. Simis. 2005. Does training in second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study. The Modern Language Journal 89/1: 54-75.
• Gómez, A., A. Devís and V. Sanjosé. 2012a. Effects of summarization tasks on comprehension monitoring of science texts in university students with elementary or intermediate English proficiency. Porta Linguarum 18: 161-176. [available at: http://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/articles-index.htm]
• Gómez, A., A. Devís and V. Sanjosé 2012b. Improving L2 macro-structural processing in students with elementary or intermediate English proficiency levels: an instructional approach focused on global coherence in reading comprehension of science texts. Submitted to Porta Linguarum.
• Gómez, A., J.J. Solaz and V. Sanjosé. 2012. Competencia en lengua inglesa de estudiantes universitarios españoles en el contexto del EEES: nivel de dominio lingüístico, estrategias metacognitivas y hábitos lectores. Aceptado para su publicación en Revista de Educación (DOI: 10-4438/1988-592X-RE-2012-363-175).
• Goodman, K.S. 1971. Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In P. Pimsleur and T. Quinn (eds.), The Psychology of Second Language Learning. 135-142. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University.
• Goodman, K.S. 1973. Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In F. Smith (ed.), Psycholinguistics and Reading. 21-29. New York: Holt. Rinehartland Winston.
• Guo, Y. and A.D. Roehrig. 2011. Roles of general versus second language (L2) knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 23/1: 42-64.
• Han, F. and M. Stevenson. 2008. Comprehension monitoring in first and foreign language reading. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL 3: 73-110.
• Harris, V. and M. Grenfell. 2004. Language-learning strategies: a case for cross-curricular collaboration. Language Awareness 13/2: 116-130.
• Kinnunen, R. and M. Vauras. 1995. Comprehension monitoring and the level of comprehension in highand low-achieving primary school children's reading. Learning and Instruction 5/2: 143-165.
• Kintsch, W. and T.A. van Dijk. 1978. Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85: 363-394.
• Kintsch, W. 1998: Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Koda, K. 1990. The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 293–410.
• Koda, K. 2007. Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning 57/1: 1-44.
• Kolic-Vehovec, S. and I. Bajsanski. 2007. Comprehension monitoring and reading comprehension in bilingual students. Journal of Research in Reading 30/2: 198-211.
• Lee, J.W. and D. Schallert. 1997. The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: a test of the threshold hypothesis in an EFL context. TESOL Quarterly 31: 713-739.
• Linde, A. 2008. To what extent does grammar knowledge account for competence in FL reading comprehension in university students? RESLA 21: 181-200.
• Morrison, L. 2004. Comprehension monitoring in first and second language reading. The Canadian Modern Language Review 61/1 77-106.
• O’Malley, J.M. and A.U. Chamot. 1990: Learning strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Otero, J. and J.M. Campanario. 1990. Comprehension evaluation and regulation in learning from science texts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 447-460.
• Otero, J., J.M. Campanario and K.D. Hopkins. 1992. The relationship between academic achievement and metacognitive comprehension monitoring ability of Spanish secondary school students. Educacional and Psychological Measurement 52: 419- 430.
• Otero, J. and A.C. Graesser. 2001. PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and Instruction 19: 143–175.
• Otero, J. and W. Kintsch. 1992. Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science 3: 229-235.
• Oxford, R. 1990: Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. 284- 297. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
• Oxford, R. 2011: Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies. Upper Saddle River: Longman.
• Pollitt, A. 2009. The OOPT: The meaning of OOPT scores. [Available at: http://www.oxfordenglishtesting.com]
• Pressley, M. and P. Afflerbach. 1995: Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
• Purpura, J.E. 2010. The OOPT: What does it measure and how? Language focus: Use of English and listening ability. [Available at: http://www.oxfordenglishtesting.com]
• Sanjosé, V., J.J. Solaz and A. Gómez. 2011. Control de la comprensión durante la lectura de textos de ciencias en inglés ¿Están preparados los estudiantes universitarios españoles para integrarse en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior? Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Sociales 25: 149-163.
• Schoonen, R., J. Hulstijin and B. Bossers. 1998. Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: an empirical study among Dutch students in grade 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning 48: 71-106.
• Stanley, R.M. 1984. The Recognition of Macrostructure: A Pilot Study. Reading in a Foreign Language 2: 156–168.
• Taguchi, E., G.J. Gorsuch and E. Sasamoto. 2006. Developing second and foreign language reading fluency and its effect on comprehension: a missing link. The Reading Matrix 6/2: 1-19.
• Tsai, Y-R., C. Ernst and P.C. Talley. 2010. L1 and L2 strategy use in reading comprehension of Chinese EFL readers. Reading Psychology 31/1: 1-29.
• Van Dijk, T.A. and W. Kintsch. 1983: Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
• Van Gelderen, A., R. Schoonen, K. De Glopper, J. Hulstij, A. Simis, P. Snelling and M. Stevenson. 2004. Linguistic knowledge, processing speed and metacognitive knowledge in first and second language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 96/1: 19-30.
• Van Gelderen, A., R. Schoonen, R.D. Stoel, K. De Glopper and J. Hulstijn. 2007. Development of adolescent reading comprehension of Language 1 and Language 2: A longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational Psychology 99/3: 477-491.
• Vidal-Abarca , E. and V. Sanjosé. 1998. Levels of comprehension of scientific prose: the role of text variables. Learning and Instruction 8/3: 215-233.
• Vosniadou, S.P., D.P. Pearson and T. Rogers. 1988. What causes children’s failures to detect inconsistencies in text? Representation versus comparison difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 27-39.
• Wagoner, S. A. 1983. Comprehension monitoring: What it is and what we know about it. Reading Research Quarterly 18: 328-346.
• Wang, M.C., G.D. Haertel and H.J. Walberg. 1993. Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research 63/3: 249-294.
• Winograd, P. and P. Johnston. 1982. Comprehension monitoring and the Error Detection Paradigm. Journal of Reading Behavior 14/1: 61-76.
• Yamashita, J. 2002. Mutual compensation between L1 reading ability and L2 language proficiency in L2 reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading 25/1: 81- 95.
• Zabrucky, K. and H.H. Ratner. 1986. Children's comprehension monitoring and recall of inconsistent stories. Child Development 57: 1401-1418.