¿Obtienen las multinacionales mayores rendimientos de sus actividades de I+D?

  1. Añón Higón, Dolores
  2. Manjón Antolín, Miguel C.
  3. Máñez Castillejo, Juan Antonio
Revista:
Papeles de economía española

ISSN: 0210-9107

Año de publicación: 2011

Número: 127

Páginas: 140-155

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Papeles de economía española

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ACKERBERG, D.A.; CAVES, K., y FRAZER, G. (2006), «Structural identification of production functions», Working Paper, Department of Economics, UCLA.
  • AITKEN, B., y HARR SON, A. (1999), «Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from Venezuela», American Economic Review, 89(3): 605-618.
  • AÑÓN H GÓN, D., y MANJÓN ANTOLÍN, M. (2009), «Does internationalization alter the R&D-productivity relationship?» Documento de Trabajo, Departamento de Economía, Universidad Rovira i Virgili.
  • BARTLETT, C.A., y GHOSHAL, S. (1989), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.
  • BARTLETT, C.A., y GHOSHAL, S. (1990), «Managing innovation in the transnational corporation», en BARTLETT, C., DOZ, Y. y HEDLUND, G. (eds.), Managing the Global Firm, Routledge, Londres: 215-255.
  • BAUM, C.F.; SCHAFFER, M.E., y ST LLMAN, S. (2007), «Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/generalized method of moments estimation and testing», Stata Journal, 7(4): 465-506.
  • CAVES, R. (1974), «Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host-country markets)), Economica, 41(162): 176-193.
  • CRISCUOLO, C., y MARTIN, R. (2009), «Multinationals and U.S. productivity leadership: Evidence from Great Britain», The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91 (2): 263-281.
  • CRISCUOLO, C.; HASKEL, J.E., y SLAUGHTER, M.J. (2010), «Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms», lnternational Journal of lndustrial Organization, 28(2): 191-202.
  • DELGADO, M.A.; FARIOAS, J.C., y RUANO, S. (2002), «Firm productivity and export markets: a non parametric approach», Journal of lnternational Economics, 57: 397-422.
  • DOMS, M.E., y JENSEN, J.B. (1998), «Comparing wages, skills, and productivity between domestically and foreign-owned manufacturing establishments in the United States», en BALDWIN, R., LIPSEY, R. y RICHARDSON, J.D. (eds.), Geography and Ownership as Bases for Economic Accounting, Chicago, Chicago University Press: 235-255.
  • DORASZELSKI, U., y JAUMANDREU, J. (2009), «R&D and productivity: Estimating endogenous productivity», Working Paper, Harvard University.
  • DUNNING, J.H. (1993), Multinational Enterprises and The Global Economy, Addison-Wesley, Nueva York.
  • DUNNING, J.H., y NARULA, R. (1995), «The R&D activities of foreign firms in the United States», lnternational Studies of Management and Organization, 25 (1-2): 39-73.
  • FLORIDA, R. (1997), «The globalisation of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign- affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA», Research Policy, 26: 85-103.
  • GERSBACH, H. y SCHMUTZLER, A. (2006), «Foreign direct investment and R&D offshoring», CEPR, Discussion Paper n.º 5766.
  • GRILICHES, Z. (1980), «R&D and the productivity slowdown», American Economic Review, 70: 343-348.
  • GRILICHES, Z. (1998), R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • GRILICHES, Z., y MAIRESSE, J. (1983), «Comparing productivity growth: An exploration of French and US industrial and firm data», European Economic Review, 21: 89-119.
  • GRILICHES, Z., y MAIRESSE, J. (1998), «Production functions: The search for identification», en STROM, S. (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • HALL, B.H., y MAIRESSE, J. (1995), «Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms», Journal of Econometrics, 65: 263-293.
  • HALL, B.H.; MAIRESSE, J., y MOHNEN, P. (2009), «Measuring the returns to R&D», NBER Working Paper Series, vol. w15622.
  • HANDCOCK, M.S., y MORRISK, M. (1999), Relative Distribution Methods in Social Sciences, Nueva York, Springer-Verlag.
  • HITT, M.A.; HOSKISSON, R.E., y KIM, H. (1997), «International diversification: Effects of innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms». Academy of Management Journal, 40 (4): 767-798.
  • HYMER, S. (1976), The lnternational Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct lnvestment Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  • JUDD, K.L. (1998), Numerical Methods in Economics, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • KAFOUROS, M.I.; BUCKLEY, P.J., y SHARP, J.A. (2008), «The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance», Technovation, 28: 63-74.
  • KLEVORICK, A.; LEVIN, R.; NELSON, R., y WINTER, S. (1995), «On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities», Research Policy, 24: 185-205.
  • KOBRIN, S.J. (1991), «An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration», Strategic Management Journal, 12: 17-31.
  • KOLMOGOROV, A.N. (1933), «Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione», Giornale dell'lnstituto ltaliano degli Attuari, 4: 83-91.
  • KUEMMERLE, W. (1999), «Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronic industries - Results from a survey of multinational firms», Research Policy, 28: 179-193.
  • LE BAS, C., y SIERRA, C. (2002), «Location versus country advantages' in R&D activities: Some further results on multinationals' locational strategies», Research Policy, 31: 589-609.
  • LEVIN, R.; KLEVORICK, A.; NELSON, R., y WINTER, S. (1987), «Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D», Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 783-831.
  • LEVINSOHN, J., y PETRIN, A. (2003), «Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables», Review of Economic Studies, 70(2): 317-341.
  • MÁÑEZ, J.A.; ROCHINA, M.E., y SANCHIS, J.A. (2010), «Process innovations and firm productivity growth», Small Business Economics, 34(2): 147-166.
  • MOLERO, J., y GARCRA, A. (2008), «The innovative activity of foreign subsidiaries in the Spanish innovation system: An evaluation of their impact from a sectoral taxonomy approach», Technovation, 28(11): 739-757.
  • NARULA, R., y ZANFEI, A. (2005), «Globalization of innovation: The role of multinational enterprises», en FAGERBERG, J., MOWERY, D. y NELSON, R.R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of lnnovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • OECD (2008), OECD Science, Technology and lndustry Outlook 2008, OECD, Paris.
  • OLLEY, G.S., y PAKES, A. (1996), «The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry», Econometrica, 64(6): 1263-1297.
  • SMIRNOV, N.V. (1939), «On the estimation of the discrepancy between empirical curves of distribution for two independent samples.» Bulletin of Moscow University, 2: 3-16.
  • TEECE, D.J. (1986), «Profiting from technological innovation», Research Policy, 15 (6): 285-305.
  • TSANG, E.W.K.; YIP, P.S.L., y HENG TOH, M., (2008), «The impact of R&D on value added for domestic and foreign firms in a newly industrialized economy», lnternational Business Review, 17(4): 423- 441.
  • VON ZEDTWITZ, M., y GASSMANN, O. (2002), «Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development», Research Policy, 31: 569-588.
  • WOOLDRIDGE, J.M. (2009), «On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables», Economics Letters, 104: 112-114.
  • ZAHEER, S. (1995), «Overcoming the liability of foreignness», Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341-363.