Estructuras organizativas, estrategias competitivas y ventajas estratégicas de las PYMESmercados globalizados

  1. Camisón Zornoza, César
  2. Boronat Navarro, Montserrat
  3. Villar López, Ana
Aldizkaria:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Argitalpen urtea: 2010

Zenbakien izenburua: La competitividad de las PYMES en la era de la globalización

Zenbakia: 375

Orrialdeak: 89-100

Mota: Artikulua

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Economía industrial

Laburpena

El objetivo de este trabajo es sintetizar las principales estructuras organizativas y estrategias competitivas adoptadas por las pequeñas y medianas empresas (pymes) con la finalidad de identificar las posibles ventajas estratégicas asociadas a las mismas y que pueden ser la clave del éxito competitivo en el actual entorno globalizado. Las estructuras organizativas propias de las pymes (pyme independiente, modelo ensanchado y/o distritos industriales) y las estrategias competitivas, sobre todo, aquéllas orientadas a la diferenciación, son fuente de algunas ventajas estratégicas que se analizan en profundidad en este trabajo, como son la flexibilidad (estructural y productiva), la capacidad innovadora, y para el desarrollo de capacidades basadas en el conocimiento, el desarrollo de un estilo de liderazgo emprendedor y/o el uso de prácticas organizativas de gestión de la calidad total.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • ADLER, P. S., BORYS, B. (1996): «Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive», Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, pp. 61-89.
  • ALDRICH, H., AUSTER, E. (1986): Even dwarfs started small: liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications, En Staw, B. y Cummings, L., Research in organizational behaviour, JAI press, Greenwich, pp. 165-198.
  • ARMBRUSTER, H., BIKFALVI, A., KINKEL, S. AND LAY, G. (2008): «Organizational innovation: the challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys», Technovation, 28, pp. 644-657.
  • BENTO, A., WHITE, L. F. (2001): «Organizational form, performance and information costs in small business», Journal of Applied Business Research, 17(4), pp. 41-61.
  • BIRCHALL, D. W., CHANARON, J. J., SODERGUIST, K. (1996), «Managing innovation in SME’s; a comparison of companies in the UK, France in Portugal», International Journal of Technology Management, 12 (3), pp. 291-306.
  • BLOCK, Z., MACMILLAN, I. (1993), Corporate Venturing, Boston, Harvard University Press.
  • BORCH, O. J., HUSE, M., SENNESETH, K. (1999): «Resource configuration, competitive strategies, and corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical examination of small firms», Entrepreneurship, Theory & Practice, Fall, pp. 49-70.
  • BURNS, T. (1963): «Mechanistic and organismic structures», En Pugh, D. (ed.), Organization Theory. Selected readings, 4ª ed., Penguin Books, London.
  • BURNS, T., STALKER, G. M. (1961). The management innovation. Tavistock, London.
  • CAMISÓN ZORNOZA, C. (1996): «Competitividad y teoría de la estrategia: un análisis aplicada a la cohabitación pyme-gran empresa», Revista Asturiana de Economía, 6, pp. 63-101.
  • CAMISÓN ZORNOZA, C. (2001): «La investigación sobre la pyme y su competitividad. Balance del estado de la cuestión desde las perspectivas narrativa y meta-analítica», Papeles de Economía Española, 89-90, pp. 43-83.
  • CAMISÓN ZORNOZA, C. (2003): «La competitividad de la pyme frente a la gran empresa: un análisis a partir de los modelos alternativos de organización de la producción», pp. 687-723. En Genescà, E.; David, U.; Guayarte, C.; Vergás, J. (coords.), Creación de empresas. Entrepreneurship, Homenaje al profesor Veciana. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. Servei de Publicacions.
  • CAMISÓN ZORNOZA, C. (2004/2005): «On how to measure managerial and organizacional capabilities», Management Research, 3(1), pp. 27-48.
  • CAMISÓN-ZORNOZA, C., LAPIEDRA-ALCAMÍ, R., SEGARRACIPRÉS, M., BORONAT-NAVARRO, M. (2004): «A meta-analysis of innovation and organizacional size», Organization Studies, 25(3), pp. 331-361.
  • CAMISÓN, C., BORONAT, M., VILLAR, A. (2006): «Innovando a través del establecimiento de alianzas estratégicas: la generación de competencias distintivas en conocimiento y su efecto en el desempeño organizativo», Revista Madri+d, 16, pp. 7-16.
  • CAMISÓN, C., BORONAT, M., VILLAR, A. (2007): «Technical strategic alliances and performance: The mediating effect of knowledge-based competencies», Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, ed. Referencia: WP-EC 2007-11.
  • CAMISÓN, C., GUÍA, J. (1999): «Relaciones verticales y resultados: estudio empírico de la eficiencia comparativa de la integración vertical versus descentralización productiva», Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8(2), pp. 101-126.
  • CAMISÓN, C., VILLAR, A. (2009): «Capabilities and propensity for cooperative internationalization», International Marketing Review, 26(2), pp. 124-150.
  • CAMISÓN, C., VILLAR, A. (in press): «Effect of SMEs’ International Experience on Foreign Intensity and Economic Performance: the Mediating Role of Internationally Exploitable Assets and Competitive Strategy», Journal of Small Business Management, pendiente de publicación.
  • CHAN, L. L. M., SHAFFER, M. A., SNAPE, E. (2004): «In search of sustained competitive advantage: the impact of organizational culture, competitive strategy and human resource management practices on firm performance», International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15 (1), pp. 17-35.
  • CHANNON, D.F. (1973): The strategy and structure of British enterprise, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  • CHASTON, I. (1997): «Small firm performance: assessing the interaction between entrepreneurial style and organizational structure», European Journal of Marketing, 31(11/12), pp. 814-831.
  • CHILD, J., MCGRATH, G. (2001): «Organizations unfettered: organizational form in an information-intensive environment», Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp. 1135-1148.
  • COVIN, J.G., SLEVIN, D.P. (1989): «Strategic Management of small firms in hostile and benign environments», Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp. 75-87.
  • COVIN, J.G., SLEVIN, D.P. (1991): «A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior», Entrepreneurship, Theory & Practice, 16(1), pp. 7-25.
  • DAMANPOUR, F. (1996): «Bureaucracy and innovation revisited. Effects of contingency factors, industrial sector, and innovation characteristics», Journal of High Technology Management Research, 7, pp. 150-175.
  • DAS, T.K., TENG, B. (2000): «A resource-based theory of strategic alliances», Journal of Management, 26 (1), pp. 31-61.
  • DE TONI, A., TONCHIA, S. (2005): «Definitions and linkages between operational and strategic flexibilities», Omega, 33, pp. 525-540.
  • DUGUAY, C. R., LANDRY, S., PASIN, F. (1997): «From mass production to flexible/agile production», International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(2), pp. 1183-1195.
  • DYAS, G. P., THANHEISER, H. (1976). The emerging European enterprise. Mamillan, Londres.
  • EBBEN, J. J., JOHNSON, A. C. (2005): «Efficiency, flexibility, or both?: evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms», Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1249-1259.
  • ENTRIALGO, M., FERNÁNDEZ, E., VÁZQUEZ, C. J. (2001): «The effect of the organizational context on SME’s entrepreneurship: some Spanish evidence», Small Business Economics, 16(3), pp. 223.
  • FIEGENBAUM, A., KARNANI, A. (1991): «Output flexibility: a competitive advantage for small firms», Strategic Management Journal, 12(2): 101–115.
  • GALÁN ZAZO, J. I.; SÁNCHEZ BUENO, M. J. (2004): «Coherencia entre el cambio estratégico y organizativo: nuevas formas de organización», Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 19, pp. 141-176.
  • GALÁN ZAZO, J. I., SÁNCHEZ BUENO, M. J., SUÁREZ GONZÁLEZ, I. (2005): «Los procesos de cambio estratégico y organizativo en los mayores grupos españoles», XV Congreso nacional de ACEDE, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
  • GALAN, J. I., SANCHEZ, M. J., ZÚÑIGA-VICENTE, J. A. (2005): «Strategic and organizational evolution of Spanish firms: Towards a holding-network form?», British Journal of Management, 16(4), pp. 279-292.
  • GEISS, G. (1989): «Risk Taking, Innovation and Organizational Environment», En R. Kuhn (ed.), Creativity and Strategy in Mid Sized Firms, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  • GEORGE, G., ZAHRA, S.A., WHEATLEY, K.K., KHAN, R. (2001): «The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absortive capacity on performance. A study of biotechnology firms», Journal of High Technology, 12, 208-226.
  • GHOBADIAN, A., GALLEAR, D. N. (1996): «Total quality management in SMEs», Omega, 24(1), pp. 83.
  • GHOBADIAN, A., GALLEAR, D. N. (1997): «TQM and organization size», International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17, pp. 121–163.
  • GOLDEN, P. A., DOLLINGER, M. (1993): «Cooperative alliances and competitive strategies in small manufacturing firms», Entreprenership, Theory & Practice, verano, pp. 43-56.
  • GOLDMAN, S., NAGEL, R., PREISS, K. (1995): Agile competitors and virtual organisations: strategies for enriching the customer, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  • HAGE, J. (1980), Theories of organizations, Wiley, New York.
  • HAMEL, G.; PRAHALAD, C. K. (1991): «La organización por unidades estratégicas de negocio ya no sirve», Harvard-Deusto Business Review, primer trimestre, pp. 47-64.
  • HITT, M. A., HOSKISSON, R. E., IRELAND, R. D. (1990): «Mergers and acquisitions and managerial commitment to innovation in Mform firms», Strategic Management Journal, 11, pp. 29–47.
  • INKPEN, A. C. (1996): «Creating knowledge trough collaboration», California Management Review, 39 (1), pp. 123-140.
  • HUGHES, J. (1966): The vital few: American economic progress and its protagonist. Houghton, Boston.
  • JARILLO, C. (1989): «Entrepreneurship and growth: the strategic use of external resources», Journal of Business Venturing, 4, pp. 133–147.
  • LEE, G. L., OAKES, I. (1995): «The “prons” and “cons” of TQM for smaller firms in manufacturing: some experiences down the supply chain», Total Quality Management, 6(4), pp. 413-426.
  • MAZZANTI, M., ZOBOLI, R. (2009): «Embedding environmental innovation in local production systems: SME strategies, networking and industrial relations: evidence on innovation drivers in industrial districts», International Review of Applied Economics, 23 (2), pp. 169.
  • MEIJAARD, J., BRAND, M., MOSSELMAN, M. (2005): «Organizational structure and performance in Dutch small firms», Small Business Economics, 25, pp. 83-96.
  • MILES, M. P., COVIN, J., HEELEY, M. B. (2000): «The relationship between environmental dynamism and small firm structure, strategy, and performance», Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8(2), pp. 63-74.
  • MILLER, D. (1983), «The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms», Management Science, 29, pp. 770.791.
  • MINTZBERG, H. (1979), The structuring of organizations. Prentice-Hall.
  • MORRIS, M.H., SEXTON, D.L. (1996), «The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: Implicationes for company performance», Journal of Business Research, 36 pp. 5-13.
  • NAHM, A. Y.; VONDEREMBSE, M. A.; KOUFTEROS, X A. (2003), «The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and performance», Journal of Operations Management, 21, pp. 281-306.
  • OCDE (2005): The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, OCDE EUROSTAT, Paris. 3ª ed.
  • OHMAE, K. (1989): «The global logic of strategic alliances», Harvard Business Review, marzo-abril, pp. 143-154.
  • OLMI, A. M. (1991): Selecting the legal structure for firm, Small Business Administration, Office of Business Development, Washington, D. C. [citado por Bento y White (2001)].
  • PORTER, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy. New York, Free Press.
  • PULLEN, A., WEERD-NEDERHOF, P., GROEN, A., SONG, M., FISSCHER, O. (2009), «Successful patterns of internal SME characteristics leading to high overall innovation performance», Creativity and Innovation Management, 18 (3), pp. 209.
  • REED, K., BLUNSDON, B. (1998), «Organizational flexibility in Australia», The international Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(3), pp. 458-477.
  • ROTHAERMEL, F. T.; HITT, M. A.; JOBE, L. A. (2006), «Balancing vertical integration and strategic outsourcing: effects on product portfolio, product success, and firm performance», Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp. 1033-1056.
  • SCHERER, F. M., ROSS D. (1990), Industrial market structure and economic performance. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • SCOTT, W. R. (1992), Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, tercera edición, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  • SKURAS, D., TSEGENIDI, K., TSEKOURAS, K. (2008): «Product innovation and the decision to invest in fixed capital assets: evidence from an SME Surrey in six European Union Member states», Research Policy, 37, pp. 1778-1789.
  • TEMTIME, Z. T. (2003): «The moderating impacts of business planning and firms size on total quality management practices», The TQM Magazine, 15(1), pp. 52-60.
  • VALKOKARI, K., HELANDER, N. (2008): «Knowledge management in different types of strategic SME networks», Management Research News, 30 (8), pp. 597-608.
  • VOLBERDA, H. W. (1996), «Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments», Organization Studies, 7(4), pp. 359-374.
  • VOLBERDA, H. W. (1997), «Building flexible organizations for fast-moving markets», Long Range Planning, 30(2), pp. 169-183.
  • WADE, J. (1996), «A communication-level analysis of sources and rates of technological variation in the microprocessors market», Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp. 1218–1244.
  • WHITTINGTON, R., MAYER, M. (2000), The European Corporation: Strategy, Structure, and Social Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • WHITTINGTON, R., PETTIGREW, A., PECK, S., FENTON, E., CONYON, M. (1999), «Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: a European panel study, 1992-1996», Organization Science, 10(5), pp. 583-600.
  • WONG, K. Y., ASPINWALL, E. (2005): «An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector», Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (3), pp. 64-82.