Are women more empathetic than men?a longitudinal study in adolescence

  1. Mestre Escrivá, María Vicenta 1
  2. Samper García, Paula 1
  3. Frías Navarro, María Dolores 1
  4. Tur Porcar, Ana María 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Any de publicació: 2009

Volum: 12

Número: 1

Pàgines: 76-83

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.1017/S1138741600001499 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

Since the 1970s there has been a growing interest in analysing sex differences in psychological variables. Empirical studies and meta-analyses have contributed evidence on the differences between male and female individuals. More recently, the gender similarities hypothesis has supported the similarity of men and women in most psychological variables. This study contributes information on women's greater empathic disposition in comparison with men by means of a longitudinal design in an adolescent population. 505 male and female adolescents aged between 13 and 16 years were evaluated at two different moments (grade 2 and grade 3, lower secondary education). They completed the Index of Empathy for Children and Adolescents by Bryant and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index by Davis. The results confirm a greater empathic response in females than in males of the same age, differences growing with age. The sizes of the effect estimated in the second evaluation (average age 14 years) are large for emotional empathy and medium for cognitive empathy.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Broidy, L., Cauffman, E., Espelage, D. L., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (2003). Sex differences in empathy and its relation to juvenile offending. Violence and Victims, 18(5), 503–516.
  • Bryant, B. K. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 53, 413–425.
  • Calvo, A. J., González, R., & Martorell, M. C. (2001). Variables relacionadas con la conducta prosocial en la infancia y la adolescencia: personalidad, autoconcepto y género. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 93, 95–111.
  • Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioural correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134
  • Carlo, G., Koller, S. H., Eisenberg, N., Silva, M. S., & Frohlich, C. B. (1996). A cross-national study on the relations among prosocial moral reasoning, gender role orientations, and prosocial behaviours. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 231–240
  • Carlo, G., Raffaelli, M., Laible, D. J., & Meyer, K. A. (1999). Why are girls less physically aggressive than boys? Personality and parenting mediators of physical aggression. Sex Roles, 40(9/10), 711–729
  • Cohen, J.(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85
  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126
  • Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 10(3), 145–158
  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697
  • Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R.(1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100–131
  • Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S.(2001). Brazilian adolescents' prosocial moral judgment and behavior: relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Development, 72(2), 518–534
  • Endresen, I. M., & Olweus, D.(2002). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: sex differences, age trends and relationships to bullying. In Stipek, D. & Bohart, A. (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behaviour: Implications for family, school and society (pp. 147–165). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 712–722
  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.
  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggressive and Violent Behaviour, 9, 441–476
  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behaviour, 32, 540–550.
  • Keung Ma, H. (2005). The relation of gender-role classifications to the prosocial and antisocial behaviour of Chinese adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(2), 189–201.
  • Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45(4), 513–520).
  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • McMahon, S. D., Wernsman, J., & Parnes, A. L. (2006). Understanding prosocial behaviour: The impact of empathy and gender among African American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(1), 135–137
  • Mestre, V., Frías, M. D., & Samper, P.(2004). La medida de la empatía: Análisis del Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Psicothema, 16(2), 255–260.
  • Mestre, V., Pérez-Delgado, E., Frías, M. D., & Samper, P. (1999). Instrumentos de evaluación de la empatía. In Pérez-Delgado, E. & Mestre, V. (Eds.), Psicología moral y crecimiento personal (pp.181–190). Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Mestre, V., Samper, P., & Frías, M. D. (2002). Procesos cognitivos y emocionales predictores de la conducta prosocial y agresiva: La empatía como factor modulador. Psicothema, 14, (2), 227–232
  • Mestre, V., Samper, P., & Frías, M. D. (2004). Personalidad y contexto familiar como factores predoctores de la disposición prosocial y antisocial de los adolescentes. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 36, 445–457
  • Mestre, V., Samper, P., Tur, A., Cortés, M. T., & Nácher, M. J. (2006). Conducta prosocial y procesos psicológicos implicados: Un estudio longitudinal en la adolescencia. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 23(2), 203–215
  • Mestre, V., Samper, P., Tur, A., Díez, I., & Nácher, M. J. (2001–2004). Estilos de crianza y variables escolares relacionadas con la conducta prosocial y la conducta agresiva: Un estudio longitudinal. R&D&I project, ref. BSO2001-304, Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología.
  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Pérez-Albéniz, A., de Paúl, J., Etxebarría, J., Montes, M. P., & Torres, E.(2003). Adaptación del Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al español. Psicothema, 15(2), 267–272.
  • Sobral, J., Romero, E., Luengo, A., & Marzoa, J. (2000). Personalidad y conducta antisocial: Amplificadores individuales de los efectos contextuales. Psicothema, 12(4), 661–670
  • Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J.(1999). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,17, 435–450
  • Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. The Journal of Social Psycholohy, 145(6), 673–685.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet