Diseño y análisis de la potencia: n y los intervalos de confianza de las medias

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., y Thompson, W.L. (2000). Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 912-923.
• Arvey, R.D., Salas, E., y Maxwell, S.E. (1992). The relative power of training evaluation designs under different cost configurations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 155-160.
• Bakan, D. (1966). Test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
• Borenstein, M., Rothstein, H., y Cohen, J. (1997). Power and precision. Teaneck, NJ: Biostat.
• Brewer, J.K. (1972). Power of statistical tests in american-educational-research-journal. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 391-401.
• Brown, G.W. (1983). Errors, Type I and II. American Journal of Disorders in Childhood, 137, 586-591.
• Cascio, W.F., y Zedeck, S. (1983). Open a new window in rational research planning: Adjust alpha to maximize statistical power. Personnel Psychology, 36, 517-526.
• Cohen, J. (1962). Statistical power of abnormal-social psychological-research: A review. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 65, 145-153.
• Cohen, J. (1965). Some statistical issues in psychological research. En B.B. Wolman (Ed.): Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 95-121). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
• Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
• Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p-less-than .05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997-1003.
• Cook, T.D., y Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
• Cumming, G., y Finch, S. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60, 170-180.
• Cumming, G., Williams, J., y Fidler, F. (2004). Replication and researchers’ understanding of confidence intervals and standard error bars. Understanding Statistics, 3, 299-311.
• Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., y Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 28, 1-11.
• Estes, W.K. (1997). On the communication of information by displays of standard errors and confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 330-341.
• Finch, S., Thomason, N., y Cumming, G. (2002). Past and future American Psychological Association guidelines for statistical practice. Theory & Psychology, 12, 825-853.
• Frick, R.W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1, 379-390.
• García, J.F., Frías, M.D., y Pascual, J. (1999). Los diseños de la investigación experimental: comprobación de las hipótesis [Experimental research designs: Verification of hypotheses]. Valencia, Spain: Cristóbal Serrano Villalba.
• García, J.F., Musitu, G., y Veiga, F. (2006). Autoconcepto en adultos de España y Portugal [Self-concept in adults from Spain and Portugal]. Psicothema, 18, 551-556.
• Harlow, L.L., Mulaik, S.A., y Steiger, J.H. (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
• Kraemer, H.C., y Thiemann, S. (1987). How many subjects? Statistical power analysis in research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Martínez, I., y García, J.F. (2007). Impact of parenting styles on adolescents’ self-esteem and internalization of values in Spain. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 338-348.
• Maxwell, S.E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9, 147-163.
• Maxwell, S.E., y Delaney, H.D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Meehl, P.E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Karl, Ronald, and slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.
• Meehl, P.E. (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. En L.L. Harlow, S.A. Mulaik y L.H. Steiger (Eds.): What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 393-425). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Meehl, P.E. (2002). Cliometric metatheory: II. Criteria scientists use in theory appraisal and why it is rational to do so. Psychological Reports, 91, 339-404.
• Nagel, S.S., y Neef, M. (1977). Determining an optimum level of statistical significance. Evaluation Studies Review Annual, 2, 146-158.
• Nickerson, R.S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5, 241-301.
• Pérez, J.F.G., Navarro, D.F., y Llobell, J.P. (1999). Statistical power of Solomon design. Psicothema, 11, 431-436.
• Schmidt, F.L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
• Schneider, A.L., y Darcy, R.E. (1984). Policy implications of using significance tests in evaluation research. Evaluation Review, 8, 573-582.
• Steiger, J.H., y Fouladi, R.T. (1997). Noncentrality interval estimation and the evaluation of statistical methods. En L.L. Harlow, S.A. Mulaik y L.H. Steiger (Eds.): What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 221- 257). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Unger, T., Korade, Z., Lazarov, O., Terrano, D., Sisodia, S.S., y Mirnics, K. (2005). True and false discovery in DNA microarray experiments: Transcriptome changes in the hippocampus of presenilin 1 mutant mice. Methods, 37, 261-273.
• Wang, Y.G., Leung, D.H., Y., Li, M., y Tan, S.B. (2005). Bayesian designs with frequentist and Bayesian error rate considerations. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 14, 445-456.
• Wilkinson, L., e Inference, T.F.S. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.