Bayesianism and interference to the best explanation

Referencias bibliográficas

• Achinstein, P. (2001). The Book of Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Christensen, D. (1991). "Clever Bookies and Coherent Beliefs", Philosophical Review 100, 229-247.
• Day, T. , and H. Kincaid (1994). "Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in Its Place", Synthese 98, 271-295.
• Douven, I. (1999). "Inference to the Best Explanation Made Coherent", Philosophy of Science 66 (Proceedings), S424-S435.
• Earman, J. (1992). Bayes or Bust. A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge (Ma): MIT Press.
• Gillies, D. (2000). Philosophical Theories of Probability. London: Roudedge.
• Hon, G. , and S. Rakover (eds. ) (2001). Explanation. Theoretical Approaches and Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Howson, C. (2003). Hume's Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• -and P. Urbach (2006). Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach. 3rd ed. Chicago: Open Court.
• Huber, F. (2005). "Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56, 101-116.
• Iranzo, V. (2008a). "Reliabilism and the Abductive Defence of Scientific Realism", Journal for General Philosophy of Science.
• -(2008b). "Abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation", Theoria 22/3 (60), 339-346.
• -(in press). "On the Epistemic Authority of Experience", International Journal of Philosophical Studies.
• Joyce, J. (2003). "Bayes's Theorem", in Edward N. Zalta (ed. ), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2003 Edition), URL: http://plato. stanford. edu/archives/win2003/entries/bayes-theorem/.
• Kuipers, Th. (2002). "Beauty, A Road to the Truth?", Synthese 131, 291-328.
• Lipton, P. (2001). "What Good is An Explanation?", and "Is Explanation a Guide to Inference? A Reply to W. Salmon", in Hon and Rakover (eds. ), 43-59, 93-120.
• -(2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Roudedge.
• Maher, P. (1993). Betting on Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Niiniluoto, I. (2004). "Truth-Seeking by Abduction", in F. Stadler (ed. ), 57-82.
• Okasha, S. (2000). "Van Fraassen's Critique of Inference to the Best Explanation". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31, 691-710.
• Psillos, S. (2002). "Simply the Best: A Case for Abduction", in A. C. Kakas and F. Sadri (eds. ), Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond (Essays in Honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part I). Berlin: Springer.
• -(2004). "Inference to the Best Explanation and Bayesianism", in F. Stadler (ed. ), 83-91.
• Salmon, W. (1967). The Foundations of Scientific Inference. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
• -(1970). "Bayes's Theorem and the History of Science", in R. Stuewer (ed. ), Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on Science. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
• -(1996). "Rationality and Objectivity in Science or Tom Kuhn Meets Tom Bayes", in D. Papineau (ed. ), The Philosophy of Science. London: Oxford University Press.
• Salmon, W. (2001). "Explanation and Confirmation: A Bayesian Critique of Inference to the Best Explanation" y "Reflections of a Bashful Bayesian: A Reply to P. Lipton", in Hon and Rakover (eds. ), 61-91 and 121-136.
• Stadler, F. (ed. ) (2004). Induction and Deduction in the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
• van Fraassen, B. (1983). "Calibration: A Frequency Justification for Personal Probability", in R. S. Cohen and L. Laudan (eds. ), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Dordrecht, Reidel, 295-319.
• -(1989). Laws and Symmetry. New York: Oxford University Press.
• -(1998). "The agnostic subtly probabilified", Analysis 58, 212-220.